You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Afghanistan
Military Dogs Weren't Left Behind in Afghanistan, Pentagon Says
2021-09-01
[People] "The U.S. military did not leave any dogs in cages at Hamid Maybe I'll join the Taliban Karzai
...A product, and probably the sole product, of the Southern Alliance...
International Airport" a front man tells PEOPLE, noting that "our military working dogs were safely evacuated"


The Department of Defense is knocking down reports that a number of dogs working with the military were allegedly left behind as the U.S. finalized its exit from Afghanistan this week.

A Pentagon front man tells PEOPLE these stories are "erroneous" and that "our military working dogs were safely evacuated."

Photos showing dogs in cages did not depict "dogs under the care of the U.S. military," the front man said.

The denial comes after American Humane — a nonprofit that promotes animal welfare and safety — issued a statement Monday claiming the U.S. was "leaving behind brave U.S. military contract working dogs to be tortured and killed at the hand of our enemies."

A front man for the group did not respond to a call and email seeking further comment.

The claim led to fury among some social media users and a spate of headlines — which the government says are wrong as they regard military dogs specifically.

Defense front man Eric Pahon tells PEOPLE that troops also did not leave any dogs in cages at the Kabul airport amid the evacuation operation.

"The U.S. priority mission was the evacuation of U.S. citizens, SIV [participants in a special visa program] and vulnerable Afghans," Pahon says. "However,
if you can't say something nice about a person some juicy gossip will go well...
to correct erroneous reports, the U.S. military did not leave any dogs in cages at Hamid Karzai International Airport, to include the reported 'military working dogs.' "

He continued: "Photos circulating online were animals under the care of the Kabul Small Animal Rescue, not dogs under the care of the U.S. military. Despite an ongoing complicated and dangerous retrograde [withdrawal] mission, U.S. forces went to great lengths to assist the Kabul Small Animal Rescue as much as possible."

In addition to the military dogs whom the Pentagon says were evacuated, there are other groups of pets in need in Afghanistan, which may be fueling the conflicting reports.

Animal rescues and advocates have said they need to get their cats and dogs out of the country after the Taliban
...Arabic for students...
takeover.

Military contractors and others working with the U.S. military also may have their own animals helping them, but they would not have been under the purview of American forces.

A separate source echoed the Pentagon's official explanation, telling PEOPLE that "this one is unfolding minute by minute, but the one connecting thread is that the dogs are not U.S. military dogs."

"Many of the dogs [with Kabul Small Animal Rescue] had worked with contractors," this source says. "The dogs were not given to local families because the Taliban bans pet ownership."

The source notes that, culturally, dogs are seen by many in Afghanistan as "unclean."

According to a Monday update on the website of the SPCAI, the animals under the care of Kabul Small Animal Rescue include 130 dogs, some of whom were pets of Americans living in Afghanistan, whose whereabouts are not entirely clear.

According to the update, staff with the Kabul Small Animal Rescue were informed on Monday that most of their dogs "had to be released into the airport" in Kabul as it was evacuated — "turning once rescued shelter dogs into homeless strays," the statement read.
Posted by:trailing wife

#13  By this logic: "He's not refusing the vaccine. He just hasn't gotten around to getting it yet..."
Posted by: M. Murcek   2021-09-01 13:23  

#12  Germany shipped out 22,000 liters of beer from Afghanistan. Once again, critics might say the beer doesn’t displace people. But beer does displace priceless heirlooms of Afghan families who might prefer that they can bring out some items for their families, rather than the easily replaceable German beer.

That story is from early June. You know, back when The Pentagon and Administration were saying its all A.O.K.

Bagram was an early July move.

Problem here is, Pentagon doesn't seem to know, and nobody seems to believe anything The Woke Forces say.

Dogs or no dogs, their credibility...
is boned.
Posted by: swksvolFF   2021-09-01 12:26  

#11  /\ BINGO !
Posted by: Besoeker   2021-09-01 10:19  

#10  Questions raised over Afghan animals put ahead of people in Kabul
Posted by: Skidmark   2021-09-01 09:37  

#9  That translates to Gaegogi in (Korean) Hangul.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2021-09-01 07:05  

#8  Chinese Embassy volunteered to coordinate successful canine repatriation, or something.

😁
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2021-09-01 05:22  

#7  "The U.S. priority mission was the evacuation of U.S. citizens, SIV [participants in a special visa program] and vulnerable Afghans," Pahon says.

"...And we couldn't even get THAT right..."

Mike
Posted by: Mike Kozlowski   2021-09-01 04:28  

#6  Possible reasoning:

1. Putting dogs on planes, and not people, bad optics.
2. Flying plane loads of hajjis to another mooslim land and not being able to land, offload, or transfer dogs, bad optics.
3. Having haggis refuse evacuation flight because of barking dogs, bad optics.
4. Fotos of dogs were left behind in cages, bad optics, denial required.
5. 90% of the dogs that wanted to get out, got out.
6. Rabies vaccination records were lost or unavailable.
7. Chinese Embassy volunteered to coordinate successful canine repatriation, or something.


Posted by: Besoeker   2021-09-01 02:24  

#5  Classic lawyerly denial by the ⭔. Just disassociate from your dereliction and say 'Rubbish! No such thing.' Screwing the soldier repeatedly is bound to bring a reckoning one day.

They say there will be a great roundup and cowboys like doggies will stand.

To be marched by the riders of judgement who are posted and know every brand - Cowboy Dream
Posted by: Dron66046   2021-09-01 02:02  

#4  Photos showing dogs in cages did not depict "dogs under the care of the U.S. military,"

Note the lawyerly defense. They retroactively defined them as not under the care of the US military - presto, the problem is fixed! This is why you hire expensive lawyers.
Posted by: Blinky Pholuling8616   2021-09-01 01:41  

#3  Lying cocksuckers gonna lie. Are Americans supposed to thank them for opening the cages before abandoning the working dogs to islamic phobias? See 30 seconds into video.


Posted by: Hupeth Henbane6225   2021-09-01 01:38  

#2  'Not a great day for America's service dogs': US military abandoned dozens of dogs alongside planes, Chinooks and Humvees worth BILLIONS in scramble to leave Kabul
Posted by: Skidmark   2021-09-01 01:23  

#1  The denial sounds a bit too lawyerly for my taste.
Posted by: SteveS   2021-09-01 00:35  

00:00