Submit your comments on this article |
Fifth Column |
Jury is shown moment Kyle Rittenhouse shoots dead BLM protestor and AR-15 he used: Claims he killed two in self-defense because one threatened to kill him and one tried to 'decapitate' him with skateboard, on first day of murder trial |
2021-11-03 |
Related: Kyle Rittenhouse: 2021-11-02 Antifa-Ravaged Portland Learns Tourists Are 'Afraid' of Their Utopia Kyle Rittenhouse: 2021-10-31 Portland trans antifa member Andrea Lane Mun promises mass political violence if Kyle Rittenhouse isn't convicted Kyle Rittenhouse: 2021-10-27 Kyle Rittenhouse’s trial begins in November |
Posted by:Skidmark |
#13 Best coverage is by Self-Defense expert, attorney Andrew Branca, at LegalInsurrection.com |
Posted by: Merrick Ferret 2021-11-03 19:39 |
#12
|
Posted by: Hupusolet Smith5796 2021-11-03 17:23 |
#11 Matt, glad to hear that confirmation from the more informed part of the legal system, Thanks. |
Posted by: Glenmore 2021-11-03 16:42 |
#10 It's not uncommon (but hardly a carved in stone rule) that a defense lawyer will tell a likely guilty client to take chances with a jury if they can't get a plea. The same attorney will often tell a likely innocent client to take their chances with a judge alone. |
Posted by: M. Murcek 2021-11-03 16:41 |
#9 ^ Glenmore, a very large majority of judges and lawyers (at least the ones who have seen the inside of a courtroom) would agree with you that juries usually (1) work their tails off to get it right and (2) usually do get it right, as I'm sure your juries did. But the legal system should not require jurors to unmake legal sausage to do their jobs. It is truly impressive to me to see how seriously jurors take their duties. That's the soul of the Republic in action. |
Posted by: Matt 2021-11-03 16:38 |
#8 Matt, I was and remain convinced we did the right thing. I was on another jury later and again we 'fought' the legal system to achieve what we believed to be justice. I am amazed at the wisdom of our jury system, and can only encourage all of us to submit to the inconvenience and BS and do their duty. |
Posted by: Glenmore 2021-11-03 16:23 |
#7 ^ No doubt the charging process as it's done now is a weakness of our jury system. For one thing, it's like watching a game and then being told what the rules are. |
Posted by: Matt 2021-11-03 16:11 |
#6 Buggsy, I was on a jury where something like the first scenario came into play. The defendant had clearly committed a crime but we were not able to figure out from the 'reading' of the legal statutes of the charges which (if either) of the charges applied, and of course could get no legal guidance from the judge (just another reading of gobbledy-gook) so we convicted of the lesser charge. |
Posted by: Glenmore 2021-11-03 15:54 |
#5 Glenmore, I doubt the jury has the cognitive ability to think that far ahead to the appeals process. In fact they select juries based on their lack of critical thinking |
Posted by: Bugs Speaking for Boskone1799 2021-11-03 15:07 |
#4 There will undoubtedly be some jurors who believe the kid had no business being there with a gun in the first place and has to be guilty of something, so they will vote to convict on something. And likely more who will vote to convict to avoid more riots, anticipating an appeal will fix it for them. Whether those groups add up to a conviction will remain to be seen. |
Posted by: Glenmore 2021-11-03 14:49 |
#3 A skateboard is that item when placed on the ground and rode on. When handled in a swinging motion, it is more akin to a Sali. |
Posted by: swksvolFF 2021-11-03 14:31 |
#2 ^ and jail ADA Binger |
Posted by: Bill Sforza2984 2021-11-03 10:15 |
#1 free Kyle! |
Posted by: Chris 2021-11-03 09:02 |