| Submit your comments on this article |
| Science & Technology |
| SLS to moon just jumped massively higher in price. |
| 2021-11-16 |
[Twitter]
|
| Posted by:3dc |
| #6 Well. Boeing's at the feed trough now. ("This is waaay better than airplanes. I mean, no plants or anything.") |
| Posted by: ed in texas 2021-11-16 15:16 |
| #5 ...NASA has been pretty much hopeless for about four decades now. When my Dad went to work there just after the Challenger accident, he figured out PDQ that NASA's primary mission is transferring tax dollars to aerospace contractors - any science or tech they trip over along the way is a bonus, and hey, we still got Tang. Mike |
| Posted by: Mike Kozlowski 2021-11-16 13:06 |
| #4 If we could put a man on the moon, why can't we ... uh...uh.. nevermind |
| Posted by: Lord Garth 2021-11-16 11:43 |
| #3 Well, NASA was told it couldn't afford the Constellation project, so it cancelled it and built SLS instead. |
| Posted by: M. Murcek 2021-11-16 10:03 |
| #2 NASA inspector general report |
| Posted by: 3dc 2021-11-16 06:22 |
| #1 93 billion? |
| Posted by: 3dc 2021-11-16 06:19 |