You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
The Latest Fifth Circuit ‘Remain in Mexico' Decision Is a Doozy
2021-12-18
[CIS] MPP continues, and the Biden administration should be chastened

The Biden administration has already reinstated MPP — with conditions and limitations, as I explained on December 3. The government could always seek to have the full Fifth Circuit review this decision en banc, with all 17 judges considering the matter, but it has not had much luck there lately.

The court was not pleased with the way the administration presented this case. The government had requested that the Fifth Circuit vacate the district court’s judgment and remand it back, an equitable — as opposed to legal — remedy. The circuit court held that "DHS’s litigation tactics" — issuing the October 29 MPP termination redo while the case was on appeal — "tilt the equities decidedly against vacatur".

What the administration has received instead is more bad precedent in a court where it already had plenty. The president should learn from this matter, however, and start applying the INA as written, and follow Congress’s mandates therein. If the administration’s not chastened by this matter, it should be.
Related:
Fifth Circuit: 2021-11-18 OSHA suspends enforcement of Vax Mandate
Fifth Circuit: 2021-11-07 Federal Court Blocks Biden Administration's Private Business COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate
Fifth Circuit: 2021-08-20 Texas Judge Blocks Biden's ‘Sanctuary Country' Orders for Illegal Aliens
Related:
MPP: 2021-12-09 Migrants rush Yuma border crossing as ‘Remain in Mexico' policy reinstated
MPP: 2021-12-03 Biden officially RESTARTS Trump's 'Remain in Mexico' policy
MPP: 2021-12-03 Man made anti-Asian remarks after hitting woman in Manhattan subway station: NYPD
Posted by:Vespasian Ebboting9735

#3  The court was not pleased with the way the administration presented this case.

Jen Psaki, lead counsel?
Posted by: Raj   2021-12-18 09:02  

#2  The word "chaste" and its derivatives does not belong in the same sentence with "Biden" or "Biden administration"
Posted by: Merrick Ferret   2021-12-18 08:57  

#1  If the administration’s not chastened by this matter, it should be.

Always nice to start the morning with a good belly laugh.
Posted by: Tom   2021-12-18 08:45  

00:00