You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia
Volodya: The US is parking missiles on the porch of our house
2021-12-23


This is the press conference, all four hours of it, translated from Russian
Posted by:badanov

#8  Musta been Napoleon. My bad.
Posted by: badanov   2021-12-23 14:37  

#7  "I know he's a good general, but is he lucky?" ― Napoleon Bonaparte

Let's see, invade and annex (back) the Crimea, bite a chunk of Georgia, use Sudeten ethnic Germans Russians to adjust borders. Nah, its everybody else's fault that they conspire against us!
Posted by: Procopius2k   2021-12-23 13:17  

#6  "If you are strong, appear weak. But if you are weak, appear strong.”

Putin is a master of this Sun Tzu precept.

Whereas our moronic leaders have mastered the art of lying to ourselves: telling themselves and their countrymen that we are strong when we're weak, and destroying the greatest strengths this country had: its loyal patriots and its splendid isolation from the world's tarbabies.
Posted by: Merrick Ferret   2021-12-23 13:01  

#5  Putin's a worthless Soviet thug who lucked into power and stayed there by murdering anyone who challenged him.
Posted by: Rob Crawford   2021-12-23 12:39  

#4  ^^^ I think this is a very good analysis. The only thing I would add is that Putin has been fortunate in having some very weak and incompetent adversaries (Obama, Merkel, Biden, et al.)

I think it was either Frederick the Great or Sun Tsu who said a skilled commander cannot rely on skill alone. He must have luck as well.
Posted by: badanov   2021-12-23 11:23  

#3  ^^^ I think this is a very good analysis. The only thing I would add is that Putin has been fortunate in having some very weak and incompetent adversaries (Obama, Merkel, Biden, et al.)
Posted by: Tom   2021-12-23 10:52  

#2  Nicholas II was an incompetent dunce hated by his own people -- including his own aristocrats. He took a powerful great country with a growing economy and a government led by talented, brilliant ministers such as Witte -- and trashed it.

Putin for all his flaws, and there are many, took a country that was in a complete shambles and restored it to a semblance of order, dignity and respect -- self-respect and the respect of the great powers. He crushed the Chechen rebellion and has at least halted NATO's surreal attempts to expand into the Caucasus and within a few hundred miles of Moscow, on Russia's southern flank. Pensions are paid and the fertility rate for White Russians, which collapsed during the initial post-Soviet era, turned around and is growing to the point where the Russian fertility rate now exceeds that of white Americans.

Hate Putin all you like -- I'm not a fan -- but he is undeniably the anti-Nicholas II. That monster was hated by his people. The Soviet leaders were feared or scorned. The Russians know Putin's a bandit but they accept and overwhelmingly support him because they know that the alternative -- decay, decline, weakness and of course corruption regardless who's in charge -- the alternative to Putin is even worse.
Posted by: Merrick Ferret   2021-12-23 09:16  

#1  Worth noting that if Putin remains president of Russia to 2024, he will have been leader of Russia longer than Czar Nicholas II.
Posted by: badanov   2021-12-23 09:02  

00:00