You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Cyber
Like California, Facebook is losing people. Wonder why
2022-02-04
By Monica Showalter

[AmericanThinker] Facebook earnings came in below expectations for the fourth quarter, and the company said numerous challenges are ahead in the first quarter.

Inflation, supply chain disruptions at advertisers and users shifting to products that "monetize at lower rates" are among the key issues the company faces.

Revenue in the first quarter will be between $27 billion and $29 billion, while analysts were looking for that number to top $30 billion.

Facebook shares tumbled more than 20% in extended trading on Wednesday after the company reported disappointing earnings, gave weak guidance and said user growth has stagnated.

For the schadenfreude-minded, it's expected to take the largest one-day loss in all U.S. corporate history, with some $200 billion likely to be wiped off the company's valuation in the course of trading today.

Heckuva job, Markie.

And yes, the key data point is that they are losing people:

Daily Active Users (DAUs): 1.93 billion vs 1.95 billion expected by analysts, according to StreetAccount

Monthly Active Users (MAUs): 2.91 billion vs 2.95 billion expected by analysts, according to StreetAccount

That's more than a million users, which marks the first time the company's user base has ever contracted. Like California, more people are leaving than coming. No new people, no new earnings growth.

Facebook's pals in Big Tech are going down, too. Seems no one is all-powerful anymore.

The company, and its founder, Mark Zuckerberg, blamed everyone but themselves for the company's bad news. Zuckerberg said it was the allure of TikTok, the Chinese spyware company that serves as a forum for lunatic left-wingery, and its apparently addictive quality to teenagers.

Other Facebook execs blamed those bastards at Apple, who instituted a revised iOS privacy policy that prevents Facebook from harvesting users' data without their express consent. Some analysts blamed the astroturf "whistleblower" featured on 60 Minutes and in testimony to Congress that Facebook knew that its Instagram app was bad for teenagers' self-esteem, which was old news when it came out. All of this could be at least partially true.

Other reasons might carry some water, too — that the company has grown as big as it can grow globally; that the users want something new, meaning Facebook is becoming the new MySpace; and that Facebook has built two huge new headquarters of "perfection," which, according to Parkinson's Law of Buildings, is a sign of an entity in decline.

The elephant in the room of these analyses, though, is the same one that's driving people out of California: that customers are disgusted with Facebook's politicized behavior.

Get woke, go broke. It applies even to the big boys.

In Facebook's case, that behavior has taken on approximately three pernicious forms.

One, the data-harvesting, and data-mining on users, in order to "nudge" and influence them. Plenty of people don't like that even for commercial purposes, but the fact that Facebook moved in a political direction is especially obnoxious.

Facebook has hired lots of Democrat party operatives, presumably to lobby Washington, but just as likely to manipulate Facebook's users into voting "Democrat" through the miracle of algorithms. Facebook, see, knows you better than you know yourself, based on all its data-harvesting. That doesn't sit well with many users, and as word gets out about it, some users are packing up.
Read more at the link:
Posted by:badanov

#9  Counting is so ooollld school. We use "preferences" now.

Determined how? MAGA alert!
Posted by: Frank G   2022-02-04 21:07  

#8  Counts? Who needs counting when you can just get your compliant media to announce the totals. Saves a lot of fussing about with papers, actually.
Posted by: SteveS   2022-02-04 20:45  

#7  It's not who votes that counts, it's who counts the votes.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2022-02-04 14:52  

#6   Chesa Boudin facing recall and is now starting to sweat

Sure, but Governor Newsom faced a recall, too, and emerged triumphant.
Posted by: trailing wife   2022-02-04 14:44  

#5  If I owned a company and got a resume that said they worked at Facebook (among others) i'd toss the resume in the bin.
Posted by: ruprecht   2022-02-04 13:55  

#4  San Francisco's Soros Commie DA and (red diaper baby / terrorist spawn) Chesa Boudin facing recall and is now starting to sweat
Posted by: Merrick Ferret   2022-02-04 11:52  

#3  Could be that people are starting, just starting, to realise that they are being manipulated. FB often injects items you don't like in your feed to trigger an emotional response and spend longer time viewing ads - as well as feed more information to the FB algorithms. This is on top of censoring what appears in your 'feed' to only favour what they would like.
Posted by: CrazyFool   2022-02-04 11:33  

#2  * users
Posted by: Merrick Ferret   2022-02-04 04:00  

#1  Um, a mite bit of an overreaction.... they still have 1.93 billion users*. Despite the hoopla about Snap or TikTok, those moronic timewasters aren't going to come close to displacing FB for another decade.

* Quiz: which two rackets businesses refer to their customers as "sets"? A: illicit drug dealing and Silicon Valley social media
Posted by: Merrick Ferret   2022-02-04 04:00  

00:00