You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Signs, Portents, and the Weather-
COVID 'Breakthrough" Redefined
2022-02-15
[Dallas Morning News] Note the newspaper article is from this morning; the on-line version is dated February 7.
People who are fully vaccinated against COVID-19 can still test positive for the virus. Health officials have come to refer to that as a "breakthrough case" of the disease.
Of vaccine failure, under the old definition of the word "vaccine".
But some health experts say the term can be misleading and misconstrued, especially as new variants have emerged and vaccination rates across the country have slowed.

"I think it was setting the vaccine up for an impossible standard that vaccines can’t possibly meet," said Jennifer Nuzzo, a senior scholar at the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security and the lead epidemiologist for the Johns Hopkins COVID-19 Testing Insights Initiative.
What "it" are you taking about, Jennifer? Fauci's promise to stop the virus with the Trumpian vaccine, or Biden's promise to 'shut it down' with by vaccinating every last man, woman, and child?
"There’s not a single vaccine that’s 100%," said Dr. Grant Fowler, family medicine department chair at TCU School of Medicine in Fort Worth. He also is chairman of the family medicine department at JPS Health Network. "Our whole goal is to [minimize COVID-19] in the population and protect the vulnerable."
Sounds like 'The Great Barrington Declaration' to me.
Nuzzo, who spoke last month at a webinar, said the term "breakthrough" may give people a false impression about the function of a vaccine.

"They’re not forcefields," she said. "They don’t repel the virus from your body."

Here’s what health experts said you need to know about the term "breakthrough case" and how COVID-19 vaccines work.

Cells have to be infected for the vaccine to respond
The scientific definition of infection means that a person must encounter a disease for a vaccine to respond, Nuzzo said.

The goal of a vaccine isn’t to eliminate all infections
Ultimately, a successful vaccine shouldn’t be viewed as one that eliminates infection, but one that fits the new definition of 'vaccine' significantly reduces hospitalizations and death, Nuzzo said.

More COVID-19 cases means more breakthrough infections
"We often hold up the measles vaccine as the standard of the best vaccine," Nuzzo said. "But if we had a lot of measles circulating, and if we did a lot of testing, we would see a lot more breakthrough infections that we just don’t notice because the symptoms are so mild."

Other terms for "breakthrough"
’If I’m talking to the lay person, I try to use the word ’have gotten two doses of vaccine and an infection,’ or ’two doses of vaccine and COVID,’ depending on the situation," Sahly said.
Which includes Mrs. Bobby and your snarker.
Posted by:Bobby

#7  None of this is new, none of this is a "redefinition".

Posted by: Rob Crawford   2022-02-15 20:18  

#6  Chris, you can self identify as a beagle....
Posted by: Vespasian Ebboting9735   2022-02-15 13:47  

#5  These shitheads are so twisted, they're now going after their own -- including this reliably left-wing virtue-signaling San Francisco Woke corporate exec mom of biracial children because she dared to question the idiotic school lockdowns.
Posted by: Merrick Ferret   2022-02-15 13:46  

#4  The age <= 5 demographic has always been remarkably resistant to infection with COVID-19, their death #s are less than in the same demographic from influenza in an average influenza season.
Unless & until health officials can explain why/how this is the case, they don't know what they're talking about.
Posted by: Bubba Lover of the Faeries8843   2022-02-15 13:35  

#3  I've just been smoking alot of pot, have not had 1 problem with covid and my wife is an "essential" worker who dealt with the public this whole time. Anyone know how I can get some grant money to research this phenomenom?
Posted by: Chris   2022-02-15 13:22  

#2  These assholes have lied so many times, and moved the goalposts so many times, that there is literally nothing they claim now that can be believed.

They've destroyed the prestige and respect of the western medical establishment. Gone.

Notice that both India and Russia refused the Pfizer and Moderna pseudo-vaccine experimental gene therapies and instead have gone with their own formulated, real ie traditional vaccines, plus sensible early treatments including HCQ, ivermectin and cocktails of azythromycin, zinc, vitamin D etc.

So now we have close to half the world's population laughing at the pretensions of the western bio-medical establishment and getting (in India's case, at least) superior results by ignoring our sssholes and going their own way.

I was never a vaxxer but it's obvious now that our bio-medical elites are incompetent and dangerously ignorant in all matters related to immunology and virology. They cannot be trusted any more than the global warming hysterics and their ridiculous "climate change models" can be trusted. End of an era.
Posted by: Merrick Ferret   2022-02-15 13:01  

#1  They are "vaccines" in the same sense that government spending is "investment."
Posted by: M. Murcek   2022-02-15 11:44  

00:00