You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Cyber
'Russian Propaganda' Is The Latest Excuse To Expand Censorship
2022-03-02
In which Caitlyn Johnstone outs herself as a tool of the Russian government, while making a legitimate point about the impulse to control online speech. The politics is settled is a terrible way to go through life.
[ZeroHedge] “I’m concerned about Russian disinformation spreading online, so today I wrote to the CEOs of major tech companies to ask them to restrict the spread of Russian propaganda,” US Senator Mark Warner tweeted on Friday.

Since then YouTube has announced that it has suppressed videos by Russian state media channels so that they’ll be seen by fewer people in accordance with its openly acknowledged policy of algorithmically censoring unauthorized content, as well as de-monetizing all such videos on the platform. Google and Facebook/Instagram parent company Meta both banned Russian state media from running ads and monetizing on their platforms in response to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Twitter announced a pause on ads in both Russia and Ukraine.

“Glad to see action from tech companies to reign in Russian propaganda and disinformation after my letter to their CEOs yesterday,” Warner tweeted on Saturday. “These are important first steps, but I’ll keep pushing for more.”

For years US lawmakers have been using threats of profit-destroying consequences to pressure Silicon Valley companies into limiting online speech in a way that aligns with the interests of Washington, effectively creating a system of government censorship by proxy. It would appear that we’re seeing a new expansion of this phenomenon today.

And the imperial media are pushing for more. Articles and news segments warning of the sinister threat posed by Russian propaganda to misinform and divide western populations using the internet are being churned out at a rate that’s only likely to increase as this latest narrative management campaign gets into full gear. The Associated Press has a new article out for example titled “War via TikTok: Russia’s new tool for propaganda machine”.

“Armies of trolls and bots stir up anti-Ukrainian sentiment.
We’ve noticed the dear little chew toys here at Rantburg. One can only hope they embrace the learning experience to better understand their enemy.
State-controlled media outlets look to divide Western audiences. Clever TikTok videos serve up Russian nationalism with a side of humor,” AP warns.
Unlike Ay Pee journalists, TikTok is not where I go to form my opinions.
“Analysts at several different research organizations contacted by The Associated Press said they are seeing a sharp increase in online activity by groups affiliated with the Russian state,” AP writes. “That’s in keeping with Russia’s strategy of using social media and state-run outlets to galvanize domestic support while seeking to destabilize the Western alliance.”
So is the Ukraine side. The internet is just another battlefield in these modern times.
The “different research organizations” AP ends up citing include “Cyabra, an Israeli tech company that works to detect disinformation,”
Oh noze! The Jooooooooooos!!!
as well as the state-funded NATO narrative management firm The Atlantic Council.
That means they’re a think tank. Lots of cachet, little impact.
As tends to happen whenever a consensus begins to form that a certain category of speech must be purged from the internet, imperial spinmeisters are already working to expand the definition of “Russian propaganda” which must be purged from the internet to include independent anti-imperialist commentators like myself.
Russia just arrests those who say things the government doesn’t like. Someone should look in on her in six months to see if her website is still live.
Imperial narrative manager Robert Potter has a thread on Twitter currently calling for me and other anti-imperialist content creators to be labeled “State-Affiliated Media” on Twitter and ideally de-platformed across all western social media, in my case solely because RT is one of the many outlets who occasionally choose to republish some of my blog posts for free.

I am not as Potter claims “an OP Ed columnist for Russia Today.” I don’t work for RT, I don’t write for RT, I don’t submit articles to RT, and I’ve never been paid by RT or the Russian government. RT is just one of the outlets who sometimes avail themselves of my longstanding invitation for anyone who wants to to republish my work free of charge. That RT editors would find my daily rants against western imperialism agreeable is not scandalous or conspiratorial but normal and self-evident.
Free content using standard spelling and grammar and a minimum of exclamation points is not to be sneezed at.
Yet for agents of imperial narrative control
Oh dear. Still, it’s important to recognize the cant. There are entire drinking games based on recognizing the catch phrases.
like Potter (who ironically works directly for the US State Department but thinks my posts should be labeled “State-Affiliated Media” by Twitter), even this is enough to justify complete silencing. I will not be in the slightest bit surprised to see a great deal more of these efforts as the new cold war continues to escalate.

The Center for Countering Digital Hate, an empire-loyal NGO ostensibly focused primarily on fighting racism and prejudice, has published a report accusing Facebook of failing to label Russian propaganda as such 91 percent of the times it occurs. The CCDH decried Mark Zuckerberg’s “failure to stop Facebook being weaponized by the Russian state”.

This sudden narrative management thrust has also seen RT taken off the air in nations like Australia, Germany and Poland, with pressures mounting in France and the UK to follow suit.

Related: YouTube and Facebook BAN Russia's RT and Sputnik channels across Europe as big-tech FINALLY clamps down on Moscow propaganda
Posted by:Skidmark

#12  Please expand on the lady’s importance.

She says what he wants to hear.
Posted by: Rob Crawford   2022-03-02 18:50  

#11  I think "she" was previously Bruce Johnstone?
Posted by: Frank G   2022-03-02 18:18  

#10  Imperial narrative manager - is that a great job title or what! I bet one of the perks is a white persian cat.
Posted by: SteveS   2022-03-02 17:05  

#9   Caitlyn Johnstone is an important dissident thinker.

Please expand on the lady’s importance.
Posted by: trailing wife   2022-03-02 16:54  

#8  There are always 'independents'. Vlad has no problem with 'them' operating from his territories. "As always, the Secretary will disavow any knowledge of your actions."
Posted by: Procopius2k   2022-03-02 14:00  

#7  Very difficult to cut off all connectivity. Difficult but not impossible to turn off most high bandwidth access. (Extremely limited explanation: Most long distance Internet traffic flows through very high bandwidth 'peering points' that join up various national and commercial IP carriers. If those that are peered with Russian networks started cutting them off, it would choke the data flow into and out of Russia. So you have to persuade those peering operators to do so.)
Posted by: Nero   2022-03-02 13:47  

#6  There are so many ways around it, your guess is basically correct, ruprecht. What companies do have to do is make sure they are up to speed on watching for the attacks themselves.
Posted by: M. Murcek   2022-03-02 13:45  

#5  Question for the more tech savy at Rantburg.
Would it be impossible to just block out a country to keep hackers and such based in that country from hacking outside of their nation (at least not without travelling geographically)?

My gut says no, but I don't really know so I thought i'd ask.
Posted by: ruprecht   2022-03-02 13:38  

#4  You have your Russian disinformation and you have your American disinformation. US Senator Mark Warner just can't stand the competition.
Posted by: Abu Uluque   2022-03-02 12:27  

#3  Caitlyn Johnstone is an important dissident thinker. The fact that the US war machine is trying to censor her means she must be hitting the target.

RT is good information as long as the topic isn't Russia. They host all sorts of thought criminals who aren't welcome on the pedophile networks like CNN.
Posted by: Omomolet Phutch9064   2022-03-02 10:50  

#2  If it made it into print, it's mostly lies. If it's being broadcast on TeeVee or radio, it's all lies.
Posted by: M. Murcek   2022-03-02 09:26  

#1  What's the harm in reading Russian propaganda, the better to compare with MSM/Uniparty/Brandon propaganda? Free speech, anyone?
Posted by: Bobby   2022-03-02 09:22  

00:00