You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia
Analysis of the current situation in Russia by an active FSB analyst
2022-03-06
Presented on Thread Reader App by Igor Sushko, American racecar driver
I will add clarification comments inside parenthesis where necessary. So, let's roll:

"I have hardly slept at all these days, at work at almost all times, I have brain-fog. Maybe from overworking, but I feel like I am in a surreal world.

The Pandora’s Box is open – a real global horror will begin by the summer – global famine is inevitable as Russia and Ukraine are main producers of wheat. (MY COMMENTARY: I disagree that this will result in global famine.)
Posted by:badanov

#10  You're welcome, tw. I meant to say something else but I forgot it.
Posted by: Thing From Snowy Mountain   2022-03-06 22:35  

#9  SteeS: Maybe now is when Xi ordered him to do it.

(Or maybe Xi's thinking "Now that idiot's going to get the Ents all riled up!" I dunno.)
Posted by: Thing From Snowy Mountain   2022-03-06 22:34  

#8  Covid fail? Midterms?

/sarc, kinda
Posted by: Frank G   2022-03-06 17:04  

#7  * Starting the conflict _now_ rather than waiting another couple months was a mistake.

That is something that bugs me. The Russian planners must be familiar with their seasonal weather. Was there some behind the scenes NATO/Ukraine event that made Putin push the Go button?
Posted by: SteveS   2022-03-06 17:02  

#6  A useful analysis, Snowy Thing. Thank you.
Posted by: trailing wife   2022-03-06 13:24  

#5  If I had times I'd make two columns. On the left hand side, "###ups by Ukraine" and on the right side "###ups by Russia."

For the Ukraine side:

* Sticking the bulk of their army out in the border of the Donbass where it could get encircled, and more or less stuck there during the Mud Season, where it's totally irrelevant to the fulcrum points of the conflict, on the south coast, and up by Kiev. It's about as useless as the Maginot line where they are now. And all for a fantasy scenario where they'd get to Take Back The Donbass.

* A couple dozen obsolete tanks that could still move around in the environment around Kiev would be really useful right about now. A mediocre force in the right place at the right time might be better than the latest modernized tanks stuck out where it can't do anything.

* They needed a national guard type force,

For Russia:

* Starting the conflict _now_ rather than waiting another couple months was a mistake. Putin was winning without fighting to the tune of 30 billion a month. Now there's a chance that people might start waking up.

* The attacker needs to be able to concentrate his forces more than the defender does. The attack on Kiev from the North needed to be larger or it needed to not happen to begin with.

* Russia would need better trucks and tanks that kept their mobility more than invincible tanks. Rather than hoping for something that will absorb hits, they needed stuff that would actually go where the fight is.

* IMHO if they were planning on doing wars like this they should have actually spent the money on logistics and mobility rather than whatever they actually spent it on.
Posted by: Thing From Snowy Mountain   2022-03-06 13:19  

#4  To me this reads like the kind of thing a DC swamp creature would write in anticipation of a new administration taking office. "Weren't my fault. I get to keep my job, right?"
Posted by: Matt   2022-03-06 12:16  

#3  Retired Russian reserve FSB Colonel Igor Girkin (call sign Shooters") shot his mouth off several times about the policy mistakes of Putin back in 2014. He didn't suffer any consequences.

There's a chance that this is authentic.

Recall that Girkin claimed responsibility for the takeover of Crimea, and briefly was commander of separatist forces in Donetsk/Lugansk before the retreat from Slavyanks in August, 2014.
Posted by: badanov   2022-03-06 11:20  

#2  Occam's Razor says the simple answer is the most likely in simplified terms (the principle (attributed to William of Occam) that in explaining a thing no more assumptions should be made than are necessary), and if it seems too good to be true, it probably isn't true?

I cannot imagine an FSB analyst would be willing to post something so blatantly "defeatist" in the midst of a full-out war. Putin declared a 15 year imprisonment for fake news publications, so this simply seems F-4 at best.
Posted by: NoMoreBS   2022-03-06 11:07  

#1  badanov -- Any guess as to authenticity?
Posted by: Matt   2022-03-06 10:32  

00:00