You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia
What Ukraine Can Learn From Finland's Stand 80 Years Ago
2022-03-20
[Bloomberg] In November 1939, soon after Hitler’s Germany invaded Poland, another massive European country likewise attacked a smaller neighbor: Russia invaded Finland. After vicious fighting through a long and bitter winter, the war ended with the Moscow Peace Treaty, in which Finnish concessions fell far short of what Stalin had hoped for in launching his invasion.

Despite being heavily outgunned and outmanned by the Soviet Army, the Finns were able to largely fight the Russians to a standstill in what they call the Winter War. The scenario was eerily similar to the situation unfolding today in Ukraine, where President Vladimir Putin’s Russia is facing ferocious resistance from the scrappy Ukrainians.

Over a decade ago, when I visited Helsinki as the supreme allied commander of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, the first place the Finns took me was to their Winter War Museum. We spent two hours there, and I was fascinated by the courage portrayed in the dioramas, exhibits, maps and photographs from the war. I treasure a gift the Finns gave me of a map showing the troop locations, and the names and faces of the Finnish generals around the border.

The Finns were outnumbered roughly two to one in terms of trained soldiers, but the more staggering differences were in tank and combat aircraft inventories. The Finns had just a few dozen of each, while the Soviets had around 5,000 tanks and 4,000 aircraft. Yet by the end of the conflict, the Finns had inflicted five times as many killed in action on the Soviet army as among their own.

While the Soviet advantages in the air and with mechanized operations eventually overcame much of the Finnish resistance, the determined nature of the defenders and the threat of an ongoing insurgency did much to shape the peace. Despite the pre-war goals of conquering the entire country and installing a puppet regime, the Soviets finally settled for a small slice of Finland’s territory (around 10%) and a pledge of Finnish neutrality.

What can we learn from the Russo-Finnish War that informs our approach to events in Ukraine today?

First and most importantly, we should appreciate that a determined military force, fighting on home terrain, can face down daunting odds to achieve success on the battlefield. The Finns have a long and fierce sense of independence, as do the Ukrainians, despite Russian protestations in both wars. I know firsthand the high quality of both nation’s militaries, which deployed under my command in Afghanistan and on other NATO missions.

When soldiers are fighting to protect their children, parents and spouses — and the independence of their nation — they have a significant morale advantage over conscripts and reservists. This was true for the Finns and remains a significant factor in the Ukraine war.

A second issue that applies in both instances is the importance of outside assistance. Volunteers from around the free world made their way to Finland to fight in the Winter War, notably from neighboring Sweden. The Finns received combat equipment and diplomatic assistance as well from many nations. The League of Nations condemned the Soviet invasion of Finland, much as the United Nations has censured Russia’s actions.
Posted by:Besoeker

#4  Do you think the sons of the Soviet staff officers that confidently predicted that the "Afghans would welcome their fraternal Russian comrades" promised that Putin would only have to chant "Nazi! Corruption! Nazis!" three times and Ukraine would collapse?
Posted by: magpie   2022-03-20 18:00  

#3   What! Sacrilege! Blasphemy! No self respecting American would call Putin anything but a slimeball! Disciplined? No no no no no he must be a psychopath, a sociopath, a Hitlerstalingoebbelsmao. If we don't call him that how do we face the fact that the sickest and most inhuman minds have run America for the past 3-4 decades? Excluding Donald Trump which was a one off incident and cannot be allowed again.
Posted by: Cthulhu of Ryleh   2022-03-20 09:01  

#2  Putin is not Stalin

Agreed: Stalin was a psychopath. Putin is an organized sociopath and therefore much more dangerous.
Posted by: Mercutio   2022-03-20 08:48  

#1  Many differences too numerous to mention. Terrain,massive exit of population uninhibited by the waving Russians, outrageous corruption within Ukrainian government and so on. A polished turd still looks like a turd. Putin is not Stalin. He is well disciplined, tenacious and goal oriented. Deep water port a highly desired need for Russia. Forcing Russia and China together has created a NATO of Asia. India, Japan, Vietnam, South Korea and of course Taiwan all now see the tide of change approaching them. With the Biden leadership they can expect no consideration. They are on their own.Latin America is lost, Africa/Arab world, and even Canada. NATO is a sad joke. If I lived in Alaska now I too would be nervous. This will be a long slog for America. With bureaucrats running things only failure will be achieved.
Posted by: Dale   2022-03-20 08:07  

00:00