You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Democrat poll numbers are consistently worse than reported in the media
2022-06-15
[AmericanThinker] Before the 2020 presidential election, I became curious about political polls claiming that Joe Biden had a ten-percentage-point lead over Donald Trump. At that time, Trump was addressing crowds in the thousands. When he was not barricaded in his basement, Biden was lucky to draw a crowd of a hundred. That did not seem right.

So I did some research and concluded that the polls were undercounting Republicans. In one of the articles, which you can read here, I predicted the silent Trump vote to be north of two percent of the electorate. I was not the first to consider this, but I was one of the first to make a prediction.

Polling organizations would not admit their polls were biased against Republicans. However, it turned out my estimate was too low by half. In fact, the polling error for the 2020 election was roughly 4% nationwide, the largest in the last 40 years.

Fast-forward to today. Inflation is 8+ percent, the price of food and gasoline is way up, crime is up, there is a nationwide shortage of baby formula, and don't get me started on the border crisis. Yet Joe Biden's job approval is close to 40% positive. That means almost four out of every ten Americans think Joe is doing a good job if you believe the RealClearPolitics average. And I don't.

It is possible that Biden's job approval is being helped by positive coverage from the news and social media. But I am not buying that, either. Spin can go only so far, and even rank-and-file Democrats have to fill their gas tanks and buy groceries.

The big difference between today and two years ago is that pollsters will now admit that their results are systemically biased against conservatives. For example, in an article published in Vox, pollster David Shor said:

For three cycles in a row, there's been this consistent pattern of pollsters overestimating Democratic support in some states and underestimating support in other states. It happened in 2018. It happened in 2020. And the reason that's happening is because the way that [pollsters] are doing polling right now just doesn't work.

Pollsters face two fundamental problems. One is developing an accurate voter turnout model that predicts who is likely to vote. The other is getting an unbiased measurement of what voters think, known as a random sample.

The turnout model is usually based on demographic distributions and historical voting records. If pollsters get the model wrong, it can bias their results. For example, in the 2020 election, most turnout models did not account for Republicans who rarely vote, participating in larger numbers than predicted.

The second problem is getting a random sample of the electorate. Unfortunately, in recent elections, this has become increasingly difficult to do. Although there are several theories as to why this is happening, it boils down to two issues. One is technology, and the other is a lack of trust in political polls.

As recently as the 1990s, pollsters could count on getting a random sample of responses to telephone surveys, but not anymore. Although most Americans have a cell phone, prohibitions on auto-dialing cell phones mean that pollsters continue to call landlines. This is problematic because landlines have a different demographic from the general population. And many of them have Caller ID, allowing voters to see who is calling.
Explanatory details at the link.
On top of nonresponse bias, another fly in Democrat approval numbers is that most polls currently sample registered voters rather than likely voters. Nate Silver believes that midterm polls of registered voters tend to lean toward Democrats.

We estimate that on average in midterm years since 1990, registered voter polls have had a 2.6 percentage-point Democratic bias — compared against likely voter polls, which have been unbiased.

If the polls are overestimating approval numbers for Biden and other Democrats, how bad is it? The political climate today is different since the 2020 election, but the Democrat poll bias seems intact, which was 4% nationwide. Since nonresponse bias, 4%, and registered voter bias, 2.6%, should be mutually exclusive, we can add them together. This gives us a total Democrat bias of roughly 6.5%

What does this mean? Until pollsters switch to sampling likely voters right before the election, you can subtract a solid 6 percent from Joe Biden's approval numbers. And if nothing changes before the election, any Democrat who leads by 3 percent or less is likely to lose.

Democrats had better pray I am not underestimating the number of hidden Republican voters, as I did in 2020.

Posted by:Unarong Flereting2564

#5  People who vote for what they want to hear should be disqualified from voting. Politicians who tell people what they want to hear and then behave differently should be ejected from office.
Posted by: M. Murcek   2022-06-15 14:25  

#4  The whole idea of polling is now backwards.

The idea used to be, candidates assert their policy for governance, their genuine philosophy and consistent principles, and polling will see how people react to it. If they like it, you will be chosen to serve in office.

What has now become the rule, is they poll to determine what people find most beneficial individually, and craft a messaging theme to sell them on the idea of giving you power to get it. Not a genuine consistent policy, just promises and vague phrases like "fighting for you". Blacks in America have been biting at that hook for well over 80 years.

We have devolved from common purpose as fellow citizens, to tribal and cultural grouping, always divided by haves and have nots, with the "other" as de-facto enemy to be controlled and dis-empowered, in a zero-sum mindset. From land of opportunity and individual responsibility to mandated "equity" (from equality of opportunity to equal outcome).

Remember, in polling, information about you is the product they sell to people seeking power over your life, career, finances and safety. Imagine if you answer polling question that you are helping build an economic, cultural and political target folder on yourself...
Posted by: NoMoreBS   2022-06-15 12:06  

#3  Just remember that for polling companies to sell their services, they have to keep the rubes on the fishing line. You come to them with - hey, look, the numbers say you're about to be blown out of the water, and the rubes and their money will probably go elsewhere to be lied to.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2022-06-15 11:02  

#2  Typically after people catch on to their games the liberals change their terminology. This happens every decade or so. liberals become progressives become lefties become third wave socialists, etc.

I'm wondering if they are checking out possible replacements for the term Democrat after the 2022 midterm beating or if they'll wait until 2024. Maybe replace the donkey symbol with a dead horse.
Posted by: ruprecht   2022-06-15 10:56  

#1  

I can see the 2020 2023 headlines now....

DEMOCRATS WIN AFTER POLLS CLOSE
Posted by: NN2N1   2022-06-15 08:03  

00:00