| Submit your comments on this article |
| Government Corruption |
| Tina Peters Challenges Colorado's Unbelievable GOP SoS Primary Election Results ‐ Where No-Name Zuckerberg CTCL Candidate Came Out of Nowhere, Made Up 35% Vote Deficit, and Won Primary |
| 2022-07-13 |
| [Gateway Pundit] On Tuesday, July 1, a no-name political operative who sits on the Board of Directors for Mark Zuckerberg’s private election mafia the Center for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL) won the Republican primary Secretary of State race in Colorado. Popular conservative and MAGA candidate Tina Peters was leading in the polls and had a 15 point lead on her closest competitor Pam Anderson before the votes were counted. But Pam Anderson from Zuckerberg’s CTCL had the night of her life and defeated Peters by 20 points. It looks like another one of those Georgia, Pennsyvania, Michigan, Wisconsin and Arizona election night miracles. It’s not who gets the votes, it’s who counts the votes. Related: Center for Tech and Civic Life: 2022-04-08 Explosive New Documentary: Obama's Campaign Manager Predicted How Many Votes Biden Needed in Wisconsin – Zuckerberg's Money Helped Get There Center for Tech and Civic Life: 2022-03-29 Milwaukee officials face Zuckerberg-related election bribery lawsuit Center for Tech and Civic Life: 2022-02-22 Lawsuit claims Michigan election chief illegally accepted Zuckerberg money to swing 2020 election |
| Posted by:JohnQC |
| #12 for comparison in the primary for Gov of CO the cumulative R vote was about 630k The Democrat Incumbant running un opposed got 530k |
| Posted by: Lord Garth 2022-07-13 19:11 |
| #11 for S of State in CO The D incumbent Jena Griswold got about 500k votes running unopposed. The three R candidates together got about 620k votes. |
| Posted by: Lord Garth 2022-07-13 19:07 |
| #10 ^^ It would be curious to run the numbers for the D primary in relation to other years. |
| Posted by: Mullah Richard 2022-07-13 17:38 |
| #9 So all that has to happen is a bunch of dems officially say they're "unaffiliated" and they can flood Republican primaries. So, open primaries effectively. |
| Posted by: Rob Crawford 2022-07-13 16:24 |
| #8 I'm with 49 Pan. The Dems have continued to act as if they have nothing to fear from the electorate. The only reason they don't want Pudding Brains to run is that there is no possible win by cheating that would pass the public sniff test. |
| Posted by: Rex Mundi 2022-07-13 15:26 |
| #7 RC, good question Colorado has a blend of open/closed primaries. In the primaries, Dems have to vote in the Dem primary. Repub have to vote in the Repub primary. Unaffiliated can vote in either primary. |
| Posted by: Lord Garth 2022-07-13 11:52 |
| #6 Open primary? |
| Posted by: Rob Crawford 2022-07-13 11:26 |
| #5 I think the first step to winning elections anywhere is getting Dominion there. |
| Posted by: Dron66046 2022-07-13 11:03 |
| #4 An indicator of things to come. |
| Posted by: 49 Pan 2022-07-13 10:55 |
| #3 A pub won't win in November anyway. |
| Posted by: M. Murcek 2022-07-13 10:49 |
| #2 Colorado has had iffy election results since they introduced the dominion machines. Coincidently, the demoncrats have been winning since then in this state. |
| Posted by: DarthVader 2022-07-13 10:38 |
| #1 Pam Anderson; not the Baywatch Pamela Anderson. |
| Posted by: JohnQC 2022-07-13 10:24 |