You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
China-Japan-Koreas
China Thoughts: ‘The point of all this is that the blithe assertions about the Chinese ability to take Taiwan are completely wrong.’
2022-08-06
[ZMan] The most recent flareup between the Global American Empire and China has brought forth all of the usual commentary about the rise of China, its plans for Taiwan and the relative decline of America. The underlying assumption is that China could take Taiwan if it wanted and there is not much the United States can do about it, short of a nuclear strike on mainland China. Further, it is assumed that China will one day make its move on Taiwan when it feels the time is right.

This is an odd set of assumptions. If China can take Taiwan and wants to take Taiwan, then why are they not taking Taiwan? The standard answer is that they think they can wait out the American empire. That could be true but there is good evidence to suggest the clock is ticking in her ability to make war. China is hitting the wall demographically and she knows it. They have a lot of young military age males right now, but a decade from now they will be nearing middle-age.
Demography is destiny, as they say.
The more likely reason for China’s hesitance is that taking Taiwan would be an enormous gamble. It is a big island with no beaches. It has great ports, but those are heavily defended. The Taiwanese military is exceptionally good. They have the best weapons America can produce and they may have the best air defense system on the planet, thanks to America using Taiwan as a listening post. At the top of the island is advanced radar used to listen to the Chinese.
Posted by:Tiny Jeater6933

#8  If we start seeing a slew of TV ads for Democrat congress critters it could be courtesy of Xi Jinping.
Posted by: Abu Uluque   2022-08-06 17:53  

#7  Will she still be able to trade significant favours if she is no longer Speaker of the House?

My guess is she needs those bribes for a last ditch attempt to keep her position as Speaker of the House.
Posted by: Abu Uluque   2022-08-06 17:51  

#6  #5 Will she still be able to trade significant favours if she is no longer Speaker of the House?

San Fran's Finest:
"For $1 Mil, I'll give you a Lewinsky. For $20 Mil, I won't"
Posted by: Frank G   2022-08-06 14:04  

#5  Will she still be able to trade significant favours if she is no longer Speaker of the House?
Posted by: trailing wife   2022-08-06 13:47  

#4  Dron, whassup on the LAC? Still tens of thousands of troops on both sides all dressed up for the party?
Posted by: Matt   2022-08-06 13:40  

#3  Great collectives of very very determined men and women have always made plans. Long winding, intricate, all-bets-hedged plans.

But God is the judge; he putteth down one and he setteth up another.

China can keep telling itself the future belongs to it. It doesn't. God resists the proud.
Posted by: Dron66046   2022-08-06 13:20  

#2  "The real threat of China is her ability to purchase favors in Washington."

The best bottom line comment I have read in a long time!
Posted by: NoMoreBS   2022-08-06 12:54  

#1  I could believe Nancy trying to shake down both the Chinese and the Taiwanese for more bribes. I cannot believe she was there to promote democracy.
Posted by: Abu Uluque   2022-08-06 12:11  

00:00