You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
China-Japan-Koreas
Gordon Chang - China Is Preparing To Go To War
2022-08-21
[1945] Last month, a Chinese entrepreneur making medical equipment for consumers told me that local officials had demanded he convert his production lines in China so that they could turn out items for the military. Communist Party cadres, he said, were issuing similar orders to other manufacturers.

Moreover, Chinese academics privately say the ongoing expulsion of foreign colleagues from China’s universities appears to be a preparation for hostilities.

The People’s Republic of China is preparing to go to war, and it is not trying to hide its efforts. Amendments to the National Defense Law, effective the first day of last year, transfer powers from civilian to military officials.

In general, the amendments reduce the role of the central government’s State Council by shifting power to the CMC, the Communist Party’s Central Military Commission. Specifically, the State Council will no longer supervise the mobilization of the People’s Liberation Army.

As Zeng Zhiping of Soochow University told Hong Kong’s South China Morning Post,

"The CMC is now formally in charge of making national defense policy and principles, while the State Council becomes a mere implementing agency to provide support for the military."

In one sense, these amendments were window dressing. "Recent changes to China’s National Defense Law that diminish the power of the State Council are largely political posturing," Richard Fisher of the Virginia-based International Assessment and Strategy Center told me soon after the amendments went into effect. "The Chinese Communist Party and particularly its subordinate CMC have always held supreme power over decisions regarding war and peace."

Why then do we care about the National Defense Law amendments?

The amendments, Fisher tells us, "point to China’s ambition to achieve ’whole nation’ levels of military mobilization to fight wars and give the CMC formal power to control the future Chinese capabilities for global military intervention."
Posted by:Besoeker

#13  I'm sure Tiawan has just been sitting there doing nothing.
Posted by: ruprecht   2022-08-21 20:37  

#12  America has never in recent memory been more politically disaffected, in debt, ignorant, fatigued by foreign failures, and poorly led by the Puppet Show leadership committee. If not now, at the height of their military, manufacturing, trade and political influence strategies of the past 20 years, then when, as their entire trajectory is flatlining across all the specturms of power as a nation? Xi needs an external focus to rouse the awakening masses.

Their problem is that pesky body of water, Taiwanese air power, 50 years of defensive anti-amphib assault prep, and few airborne drop zones that won't be killing grounds as they push the stick out the door! If they do standoff and bounce the rubble with long-range precision munitions to obviate all that, why bother to then arrive and deal with the massive graves registration, public health and Berlin-level wasteland?
Posted by: NoMoreBS   2022-08-21 12:42  

#11   I was thinking they might attack Taiwan and see what we do about it.

We’ve been discussing that here, too, Secret Master. My takeaway was that would be much harder for China to accomplish than it appears — but again, I’m not qualified to judge.
Posted by: trailing wife   2022-08-21 12:27  

#10  ^ TW: I was thinking they might attack Taiwan and see what we do about it.
Posted by: Secret Master    2022-08-21 12:09  

#9  Do they have a plan for when the first bomb hits 3 gorges dam?
Posted by: Silentbrick   2022-08-21 12:01  

#8  China has been preparing for war against America for a generation, according to things people have been saying here.

China feels it's reaching a "it's now or never" moment; and "now" looks a lot better than "never."

With their population having reached the inflection point a decade earlier than admitted, and the country dependent on imports for both food and fuel, now or never sounds right. But the impression I have is that China’s is a land army, which has certainly annoyed the neighbours, but won’t get them to America, though I’m not at all qualified to judge. And athough —again an impression — they don’t seem to have the corruption problems seen in Russia, all their tires are made in China, too.
Posted by: trailing wife   2022-08-21 11:57  

#7  If China sees its overseas imports get shut down where is it going to go for resources?
Posted by: Procopius2k   2022-08-21 11:48  

#6  I'm not exactly an "old China hand," but this matches what I'm picking up by keeping my ear tuned to various sources. China feels it's reaching a "it's now or never" moment; and "now" looks a lot better than "never." And they need to get their population's mind off how their system's contradictions are being highlighted (if you will forgive my paraphrasing some Lenin.)

Plus, as much as most of us don't like the CCP, there isn't a clamor among the American public to go to war with China. Quite the opposite, as the contradictions are being highlighted here as well.

....which probably means war, doesn't it?
Posted by: Secret Master   2022-08-21 11:26  

#5  /\...Not that I am saying that Preparations for War and 'Reestablishing the Imperial Majesty internal rule' can't happen at the same time.
Posted by: magpie   2022-08-21 11:25  

#4  How much of this is 'War Preparations' and how much of this is the Central Communist Party clawing back power and wealth (same thing really) that various Oligarchs had accumulated? China has a long history of 'Warlords' breaking away from the 'Central Authority' and doing mischief ...maybe even plotting rebellion.
Posted by: magpie   2022-08-21 11:22  

#3  How will they feed their troops?
Posted by: Rob Crawford   2022-08-21 10:32  

#2  They hit us like Pearl Harbor, but we ignored the attack so that we could win the election of Joe Biden. This will confuse American History students in the future unless we end up as serfs to Klause Schwab’s replacement Justine Trudeau.
Posted by: Super Hose   2022-08-21 09:21  

#1  Rubbish! If you believe conspiracy theorist Gordon Chang, you probably also believe the term 'Gain of Function' is somehow connected to biological warfare research.

[sarc off]
Posted by: Besoeker   2022-08-21 02:21  

00:00