You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Science & Technology
Is the V-280 Valor the right choice for the Army?
2022-12-10


[YouTube] On Monday, the Army announced that Bell’s V-280 Valor has won the Future Long-Range Assault Aircraft (FLRAA) competition aimed at fielding a modern replacement for the legendary UH-60 Black Hawk helicopter. The contract award, potentially worth as much as $1.2 billion, will fund ongoing development of the platform heading toward a production contract worth tens of billions of dollars.

But many have voiced concerns about the Valor's ability to do the job... So we set out to find answers to your most pressing questions.
My take on this as a light infantry guy from the 101st that flew in UH-60s:

I love the fact it is so much faster. I love the fact it can carry 25% more weight for the same squad size (sling load heaven). We never touched our UH-60s down on the ground to unload. A stationary helicopter is a very juicy target. It came in at 10-15mph about 4-5 feet off the ground and we chucked our rucksacks out and jumped. (Really sucked at Camp Lejeune where we had a carpet of plants on a tidal flat and it looked like solid ground at 4 feet, but there was 5 feet of water under that.) With the side doors, that looks possible.

With the UH-60, we could land in very tight LZs in the woods that were technically tighter than the diameter of the rotor. It can take off branches 4in diameter just fine and we did on a regular basis. With the larger V-280, some smaller but closer LZs are not available and you may be landing light infantry 5km further back. That is a long fucking walk with a full combat load and a 80lb pack. 30 minutes to 1 hour away. Also medivacs may have to land farther away. Goodbye golden hour in some situations.

There are trade offs, just like every other military system.

If we are really fighting in the South China Sea, this system will be a godsend and really be useful. If we are fighting in tight jungles, it could be a huge pain in the ass and more trouble than it is worth. I would argue to keep some UH-60 like capability for the jungle type scenario while making the V-280s.

Best of both worlds.
Related:
V-280 Valor: 2022-12-06 Army chooses Bell's tilt-rotor aircraft over Sikorsky's helicopter for $1.3 billion Black Hawk replacement contract
V-280 Valor: 2016-08-30 EXCLUSIVE: Meet Bell's V-247, Armed Tiltrotor Drone For Marines
Related:
UH-60 Black Hawk: 2021-08-19 Dozens Of U.S.-Bought Afghan Air Force Aircraft Are Now Orphaned At An Uzbek Airfield
UH-60 Black Hawk: 2021-02-03 National Guard helicopter crash kills 3 in Idaho
UH-60 Black Hawk: 2020-08-30 PICTURED: Two members of elite Night Stalkers helicopter unit killed when their Black Hawk crashed on island used to train Navy SEALs
Posted by:DarthVader

#7  I do think I would like to see a modular version that would allow fork lift removal of either rotor assembly for maintenance without removing the entire airframe from service.
Posted by: Skidmark   2022-12-10 13:19  

#6  A Reality Check On The Army Picking V-280 Valor Over SB>1 Defiant
Posted by: Skidmark   2022-12-10 13:10  

#5   My take on this from the TOC...this is a QRF support system that can launch from much farther away, carry a team and sling a battle-ready 'last mile' transport and still arrive in a timely fashion.
Posted by: Skidmark   2022-12-10 13:02  

#4  /\ In my view....American taxpayers are "veterans" as well !

* Thank you for sending me to college at your expense not once, but three times.

* Thank you for paying my wages, benefits, and retirement.

* Thank you for providing housing for may family.

* Thank you for providing elementary school for my children.

* Thank you for covering the cost of my cancer treatment at Bethesda Naval Hospital.

* Thank you for TRICARE medical coverage.

Thank you !



Posted by: Besoeker   2022-12-10 11:11  

#3  Darth, though not a military vet, those were my thoughts exactly.
Posted by: Deacon Blues   2022-12-10 10:49  

#2  Doesn't matter if it's right. It just has to be new.
When the Army came out with the specs for bid for the replacement for the Kiowa (basically a Bell JetRanger), it was "Just like the Kiowa, only different and new."
Posted by: ed in texas   2022-12-10 09:48  

#1  good info, Darth
Posted by: Mercutio   2022-12-10 09:13  

00:00