You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
AG Garland Dodges on Failure to Crack Down on Protests outside Justices' Homes
2023-03-02
[NATIONALREVIEW] During a Tuesday Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, Attorney General Merrick Garland refused to take responsibility for the Department of Justice’s failure to prosecute protesters who regularly demonstrate outside the homes of conservative Supreme Court justices, arguing that the federal marshals on the ground have the discretion to arrest the protesters and have chosen not to.

In his first appearance before the 118th Congress, Garland was grilled by Republican senators about the Department of Justice’s failure to enforce a federal law that prohibits protests outside the homes of judges and jurors, who might be intimidated into changing their thinking on pending cases in response to such displays. Since the draft opinion in the Dobbs case, which ultimately overturned Roe v. Wade, was released, protests outside the justices’ suburban homes in Virginia and Maryland have intensified.

"You just said yes, it’s a crime to protest at the home of a judge. Same goes for jurors, by the way, with the intent of influencing a case. But in the wake of the leak of the Dobbs decision, when rioters descended on the homes of six Supreme Court justices, night after night after night, you did nothing," Cruz said to Garland. "The Department [of Justice] did nothing."
Posted by:Fred

#8  Some dodging is as ineffective as doing the Watusi in a bullfighting ring. The important part of this process and an impeachment process is not the conviction- that won’t happen. Indictments, prosecutions and convictions are a possibility after the DOJ is cleaned out like the Augean Stables.

Any current hearings are more like a hostage taking for anyone not on their side. They are forcing the Dems to defend Garland’s cellophane rationalizations. There are 23 Dem Senate seats at issue in 2024. Will the Dems risk Senate seats to defend Buttigieg, Mayorkas, Wray or Garland? Will Biden’s puppet master pull the plug on some of these guys? It is hard to tell, but giving them a pass is a bad plan. The time for us to turtle is long past. If you see cordiality from a Republican to the traitors that is a RINO alarm.
Posted by: Super Hose   2023-03-02 12:43  

#7  I'll settle for a Cromwell style disinterment later. Especially if "Dr. Jill" is still alive to be handed a shovel on pay per view.
Posted by: M. Murcek    2023-03-02 11:51  

#6  Y'all really need to give up hope on impeachment. Not gonna happen and nothing will be done to any of these mutherfuckers ever.
Posted by: Chris   2023-03-02 11:49  

#5  Merrick Garland: ‘Diplomatic Concerns’ with Treating Mexican Drug Cartels as ‘Foreign Terrorist Organizations’
Posted by: Skidmark   2023-03-02 07:27  

#4  ...the federal marshals on the ground have the discretion to arrest the protesters and have chosen not to.

However, if one just stands silently across from an abortion clinic guess what the instructions are going to be to the fed sent to arrest.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2023-03-02 07:06  

#3  Thanks Skid. Looks like we've got some impeachment work to do with Wray and Garland.
Posted by: Besoeker   2023-03-02 07:00  

#2  Wray, DOJ slammed by ex-FBI agents over perceived bias in Mark Houck case, Crossfire Hurricane
Posted by: Skidmark   2023-03-02 06:05  

#1  The most important case the rank and file agents have in the history of the FBI and the DOJ is the prosecution and conviction of Garland and Wray who are trying to destroy their agencies via weaponizing the agencies against Dem political opposition.
Posted by: Mad Eye Omeretch7959   2023-03-02 02:04  

00:00