You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Land of the Free
Biden-⁠Harris Administration Announces National Cybersecurity Strategy, USAF removes markings & tail numbers
2023-03-06
[whitehouse.gov] AMC has recently removed tail flashes for its active-duty tankers, starting with the new Boeing KC-46. The decision was made to make it easier for aircraft to move between units without having to be repainted. But that change was specifically for what AMC calls fleet management and not related to limiting public knowledge of aircraft movements.

It also comes as AMC has worked to overhaul itself into a warfighting command instead of one focusing on support for combat aircraft. The command is working to make its aircraft directly contribute to a fight, through steps such as launching cruise missiles from a pallet on a C-130 and UAVs from KC-135s.

"Woven through our culture is a foundational knowledge of the business we are in, the war business," AMC Commander Gen. Mike Minihan wrote in a "manifesto" to the command in October. "The tactics, techniques, and procedures we refine daily and those that have been refined from the long line of Mobility Airmen before us. Lethality is what we will deliver."

USAF Mobility Aircraft Operating Without Most Markings, Tail Numbers

[aviationweek] For decades, airlift and tanker aircraft of the U.S. military have flown with a proud "U.S. AIR FORCE" painted on the side of the fuselage, along with markings indicating home units, tail numbers and oftentimes a tail flash showing the unit’s heritage.

But that is no more for much of Air Mobility Command (AMC).

AMC recently directed a change to its fleet, removing the large "U.S. AIR FORCE," unit markings, tail numbers and other identifying markings. Recent photographs of KC-135s and C-130s operating show just a small U.S. flag on the tail and a light gray Air Force roundel.

AMC says the change was directed for operational security.

"We operate across the globe every day, often supporting sensitive movements of people and cargo. Understandably, we have concerns about the operational security impacts to these missions in the modern era of on-demand, real-time information," AMC says in a statement. "Subdued paint schemes that limit identifiable information is one way we are taking a hard look at how we operate to ensure our ability to continue to deliver for America and our allies and partners around the world.

"Because of operational security concerns, we cannot provide specifics, though our aircraft will maintain markings as required by law."

The command would not elaborate on the change beyond this statement.

The changes mean some of the most common aircraft in the U.S. Air Force fleet, such as the KC-135 tanker, will have less markings than some combat and special operations aircraft.

AMC has recently removed tail flashes for its active-duty tankers, starting with the new Boeing KC-46. The decision was made to make it easier for aircraft to move between units without having to be repainted. But that change was specifically for what AMC calls fleet management and not related to limiting public knowledge of aircraft movements.

It also comes as AMC has worked to overhaul itself into a warfighting command instead of one focusing on support for combat aircraft. The command is working to make its aircraft directly contribute to a fight, through steps such as launching cruise missiles from a pallet on a C-130 and UAVs from KC-135s.

Posted by:746

#7  Mentioning pizza triggers people inside the beltway these days.
Posted by: M. Murcek   2023-03-06 13:27  

#6  Troubling, an I&W data point, since it suggests OPSEC against active and detailed Order of Battle collection against USAF capabilities, patterns and basing.

And I can imagine only one looming adversarial event that prompts this kind of action, and its in the South China Sea.

There was a time when the Pentagon pizza index was a genuine data point on that list, but I can't imagine that is still considered?
Posted by: NoMoreBS   2023-03-06 12:21  

#5  But of course, a person could just use Flight Tracker (flightaware*com) and use aircraft type, or Scott AFB - Joint Andrews AFB used as an example.
scan using To/From data.

Posted by: NN2N1   2023-03-06 08:22  

#4  Wasn’t just the USAF changing tail numbers…..
Posted by: USN, Ret.   2023-03-06 07:42  

#3  I'm sure it goes on everywhere, but a few years back people would stand at the end of the runway at Ramstein, GE and jot down tail numbers. I thought about the OPSEC implications and looked into it a bit. I discovered there are on-line clubs (nothing better to do) that track USAF arrivals and departures. Here's an idea.



Posted by: Besoeker   2023-03-06 06:48  

#2  ...Back in the day, Mother MAC didn't put markings on its birds at all except for US AIR FORCE and the aircraft serial number.

And I'll let you in on a little secret: read the first of BGen Chuck Yeager's autobiographies as to why you can't always trust the serial number.

Mike
Posted by: MikeKozlowski   2023-03-06 06:39  

#1  not related to limiting public knowledge

Will that work for trains?
Posted by: Skidmark   2023-03-06 03:39  

00:00