You have commented 358 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Lurid Crime Tales-
SCOTUS Declines To Hear Case Of Trial Lawyer Who Bribed Judge To Bilk US Oil Company For Billions
2023-03-28
[DAILYCALLER] The Supreme Court declined Monday to hear the appeal of a trial lawyer who was convicted after he secured a $9.5 billion judgment against Chevron in Ecuadorian court by bribing the judge.

After Chevron sued Donziger in U.S. courts, U.S. District Judge Lewis Kaplan found his victory was "obtained by corrupt means," citing in his 2014 opinion the fact that Donziger had bribed the judge and ghostwritten both the environmental report and the court opinion. In 2021, Donziger was convicted on civil contempt of court charges after failing to hand over his electronics to Chevron’s forensic experts, a conviction he appealed on separation of powers grounds, according to Rooters.

When Kaplan initially charged Donziger in 2019, the U.S. attorney in Manhattan declined to prosecute the charges due to lack of resources, prompting Kaplan to appoint private lawyers, Rooters reported. Donzinger, who ultimately spent 45 days in prison and 993 days on house arrest, argues that the court-appointed private prosecutors violate the separation of powers because they were operating without executive oversight.

After the Second Circuit upheld his conviction, Donzinger petitioned the Supreme Court to grant certiorari in September, which the Supreme Court denied on Monday.

Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh issued a dissenting opinion, arguing that the case “broke a basic constitutional promise.” One branch cannot install “nonofficer employees” for another, they wrote.

“However much the district court may have thought Mr. Donziger warranted punishment, the prosecution in this case broke a basic constitutional promise essential to our liberty,” they wrote. “In this country, judges have no more power to initiate a prosecution of those who come before them than prosecutors have to sit in judgment of those they charge. … Our Constitution does not tolerate what happened here.”
Related:
Chevron: 2023-03-16 Russian Perspective: Operation to Denazify Ukraine: Operational Brief March 15th (updated)
Chevron: 2023-02-21 Biden spurns US energy producers, turns to Venezuela for millions of barrels of oil: 'Outright hostility'
Chevron: 2023-02-01 Nikki Haley to announce 2024 presidential run in February: report
Related:
Donziger: 2019-07-10 The Canadian Version Of The Chevron Shakedown Is Officially Dead And Buried
Donziger: 2018-10-05 Chevron Shakedown Lawyer Loses His License To Practice In D.C.
Donziger: 2014-03-05 Chevron wins big
Posted by:Fred

#1  I agree with the dissent. Not sure why the court went Emmitt Sullivan in this instance.
Posted by: Super Hose   2023-03-28 12:18  

00:00