You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia
'Barbarian Territory.' Why Europe is at war with the memory of the Russians about the Victory
2023-05-09
Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited.
[REGNUM] If Russia is perceived as a savior, then how to build pan-European unity due to the presence of a "threat from the East"? How to maintain the integrity of NATO - the most important instrument of the American military-political presence in Europe? No way. Therefore, Russia in the eyes of the Europeans must remain an enemy. A barbarian land to which the Old World owes nothing.
It doesn’t count as saving if, after driving out the enemy, you stay on as equally rapacious conquerors as your first step toward the goal of conquering the rest of the world.
On May 9, Russia celebrates the next, 78th anniversary of the Victory Day over Nazism. The anniversary of the Great Victory in the war, where not only the existence of the Russian (then called Soviet) state, but also of our entire people was at stake.

Not surprisingly, Victory Day is one of the two - along with the New Year - the most important holidays for all Russians. Yes, this is a holiday with tears in the eyes (since more than 26 million Russians died in that war), but still a holiday.

For us, but not for the descendants of our former allies in the anti-Hitler coalition.

The fact is that for the West this day has a slightly different meaning. This is not Victory Day, but Unity Day. Or Europe Day, as they call it. The day when European peoples overcame differences, forgave each other and united.

"For the West, the Second World War is a secondary war, much less important than the First World War. Now Europe lives in a single European Union, uniting the former losers and winners," says Russian political scientist Oleg Bondarenko.

Yes, you can understand them to some extent. It was for the Soviet Union that Hitler and the Nazis were mortal enemies who waged a war to destroy the Soviet people, who were considered “inferior” by the Nazis. And for Europe, it was just another occupation cabal inside.

The French, Czechs, Slovaks were not burned in furnaces and were not shot simply because they are French, Czechs and Slovaks, that is, peoples who do not have the right to live. And the Nazis considered Soviet citizens as such and were going to eliminate them as part of the Ost plan.
Slavs were considered Untermenschen, as unter as Jews. As were non-Aryan and so-called “mixed race” peoples of all sorts, a common attitude among Westerners since the 18th century or so.
Moreover, some Europeans felt quite comfortable within the framework of this cabal. The same French in the Nazi troops served many times more than participated in the Resistance. That is why they overcame differences relatively easily, that is why they do not see anything strange in the fact that marches of SS veterans are organized in the same Baltic states.
Ditto white nationalist groups in the Slavic countries, who consider the paleness resulting from long winters spent indoors proof of their natural superiority to their more tanned neighbours. But I have a Bangladeshi friend who went to military school and university in Moscow back in the Soviet days, and he said the natives were dreadfully racist then as well.
Russia does not interfere in the internal affairs of other countries,
*snicker* ...Oh wait — are you serious??
so Moscow does not teach its neighbors the correct perception of Victory Day. However, the problem is that Europe is trying to teach us the wrong thing. He does not advise, he does not say - no, within the framework of Western "soft power" and with the help of pro-Western forces in Russia, a course was set for the systemic reforging of Russian consciousness regarding the events of the Great Patriotic War.

A real information war was launched against the historical memory of Russians, already weakened due to the ideological weakness of the state and the so-called "reforms" of the domestic education system.

WASHING OUT THE MEMORY
The methods were quite technological. For example, Western propagandists carried the idea that the Soviet Union could not be proud of the victory over Nazi Germany - after all, he, in fact, gave birth to it.

Not France or England, which fed Hitler Czechoslovakia in the hope of directing his expansion to the east. Namely, the USSR, which helped to restore the industry of Germany in the 20s and 30s.
It did?
The USSR, which concluded a non-aggression pact with Hitler after the Poles and the British disrupted all projects to create a collective security system in Eastern Europe.
A confusing sentence. Perhaps if I read it a few more times I’ll understand...
Therefore, they say, there is nothing to be proud of - you have to repent, and then forget.

In addition, Western propaganda and its Russian promoters downplayed the role of the USSR in the victory over Nazism. To do this, they exalted the participation of the West (through lend-lease - a really important, but not critical contribution to the victory),
....it’s kind of hard to wage war without trucks, tanks, and uniforms, but go on...
and also said that the main merit in Hitler's victory over Moscow belongs to General Frost, and not to Soviet commanders or Stalin.
Every military unit had its officers and its political commissars, and the commissars outranked the officers. This has an impact on war fighting effectiveness, or so it seems to me.
They said that all our subsequent victories were Pyrrhic, that we “threw the Germans with meat” (which is not true - the ratio of military losses was approximately 1.3 to 1 in favor of Germany, which is quite parity, given the disastrous first year of the war for the USSR and the massive extermination of Soviet prisoners in German camps).
A fair point, though the extermination of Soviet prisoners in Soviet camps was also an issue.
In addition, the West struggled with the perception of Hitler as an absolute evil. Of course, it is extremely difficult to wash away the image of a person on whose hands the blood of tens of millions of people is. But you can lower to his level another leader who was the conqueror of evil. That is why, within the framework of Western ideology, they began to equate Stalin and Hitler, even to some extent identify them.
Stalin killed more, though less efficiently, and Soviet Communism more still over roughly two full generations. But Stalin also had years more than Hitler to work on the project. On the other hand, Mao tse Tung killed even more, so there’s that.
Well, at the same time, to identify the Nazi repressions, which took place according to the biological principle, that is, by blood, regardless of the actions of a person, and the Soviet ones, where they nevertheless punished based on political views or actions. Identify the Nazi regime (misanthropic, denying the right of "others" to exist) and the Soviet regime (focused on the collective development of all peoples, the principles of indivisible security and cooperation of nations).
One identified and judged people deserving of mass death based on ethnicity, the other by economic class. Both were murderously totalitarian, so there is no virtue in choosing the latter over the former.
And, of course, they tried to cover up Nazi war crimes on the territory of the USSR (the physical destruction of entire regions, for example, during Operation Winter Magic) with tales of "millions of German women raped by Soviet soldiers."

As a result, Soviet soldiers were to be perceived not as the liberators of Europe, but as new occupiers.
Because they were still there, occupying and enforcing the Communist system on unwilling nations.
Despite the fact that, as the deputy head of the Security Council Dmitry Medvedev correctly noted, more than a million Soviet soldiers gave their lives for peace and freedom from fascism in Europe -
...liberation from national socialism, only to enslave them to international socialism. Yay...
of which 600 thousand in the process of liberating Poland, 380 thousand in the Czech Republic and Hungary, 100 thousand in Germany.

EUROPEAN AND ANTI-RUSSIAN GOALS
In this war with memory, the West has invested a lot of resources - human, intellectual, financial. And he did not try because he was jealous of our perception of Nazism (European forgiveness has already led to far-right parties winning elections, threatening the local liberal order). And not even because he is aware of the ambiguity of his participation in the common Victory. And not even because now the descendants of collaborators rule in the West.

No, the goals are much more rational. And they concern both intra-European moments and the conflict with Moscow.

So, Europe is trying to forget about the war. “ Within the framework of the new concept of European unity, it is extremely important to minimize attention to the events of the Second World War. Which from a European point of view seems quite reasonable and rational ,” says Oleg Bondarenko.

The EU authorities are proud of their pan-European project, which seems to have united almost the entire European space peacefully for the first time in centuries-old European history, and they are afraid of the appearance of any split lines like fire. Including those based on historical disputes or territorial claims.

That is why they are trying to extinguish any Russian initiatives reminiscent of the Second World War. And the best instrument of redemption is, of course, washing the Russian narrative about the Great Patriotic War out of the minds of citizens.

Another important goal was the demonization of Russia. The West does not want and is not ready to recognize the fact that the Russian Federation is part of a large European civilization and at least three times saved this civilization at the cost of its own - from the Mongols, Napoleon and Hitler.

If Russia is perceived as a savior, then how to build pan-European unity due to the presence of a "threat from the East"? How to maintain the integrity of NATO, the most important instrument of the American military-political presence in Europe? No way. Therefore, Russia in the eyes of the Europeans must remain an enemy. A barbarian land to which the Old World owes nothing.

As for maintaining the conflict with Moscow, here the West needs to force the Russians themselves to consider their state barbaric. The one that can break out of its barbaric state only through "Euro-Atlantic integration." That is, in other words, turning into a vassal.

And for this it is necessary to wash out from the memory of Russians all the objects of pride in their national history. Make you forget about all cultural achievements, about literature, music, exploits - and, of course, about the people's victory over the most powerful military machine in all of human history. over the Wehrmacht.

Finally, washing away the memory of the Victory serves the purpose of Russia's disintegration. The point is that Russia is a multinational, multicultural and multiconfessional country. This diversity brings a huge number of benefits (humanity has always developed through the interaction of cultures), but also great risks.

If the authorities of such a state fail to create and consolidate the supranational identity of citizens (when they consider themselves a single whole, one civil nation), then the state begins to crumble. We need common meanings, common values, common achievements.

And the Victory over Nazism is one of the most important common achievements. As the well-known song says, "one for all", achieved by all the great supranational Soviet people. It has become the most important bond supporting first the Soviet, and now the Russian statehood.

Exactly the same bond that is now becoming common to all the peoples of Russia in the fight against Nazism in the spaces of the former Ukraine.

That is why Russia is fighting to preserve the historical memory and truth about that war. And then, after 78 years, it will fight to preserve the memory and the truth about the present.

May 9, 2023
Gevorg Mirzayan
According to MEMRI, Mr. Mirzayan is “Associate Professor at the Department of Political Science and Mass Communication of Financial University and a prolific columnist.” Also, in the photo they share here, he has beautiful hair and speaking eyes.
Posted by:badanov

#6  Punctiliously observed, European Conservative. And extendable to the two totalitarianism socialisms as a whole as well..
Posted by: trailing wife   2023-05-09 15:56  

#5  I remember the words of an historian who said: The main difference between Nazi camps (the regular ones like Dachau, not the extermination camps) and Stalin's GuLag was that the Nazis wanted you to die by working to death. The Soviets wanted you to work and just didn't care whether you died or not.
Posted by: European Conservative   2023-05-09 15:13  

#4  It’s a pity that True German Ally is no longer with us. He had the dubious pleasure of having survived both Nazi concentration camps and Soviet stalags, and so would have had interesting things to say on this.
Posted by: trailing wife   2023-05-09 14:36  

#3  "Not France or England, which fed Hitler Czechoslovakia in the hope of directing his expansion to the east. Namely, the USSR, which helped to restore the industry of Germany in the 20s and 30s."

That includes 1933-1941. You were saying?
Posted by: European Conservative   2023-05-09 13:57  

#2  He looks like a bobble-head doll.
Posted by: AlmostAnonymous5839   2023-05-09 10:55  

#1  Russia does not interfere in the internal affairs of other countries

He looking to take KGP's job at the White House?
Posted by: Procopius2k   2023-05-09 07:38  

00:00