You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Justice Thomas Dissents on Redistricting Case
2023-06-12
[Epoch Times] Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas issued a lengthy, critical dissent in the high court’s ruling that struck down Alabama’s electoral map for congressional elections.

In a 5—4 ruling (pdf) last week, the court found that a map drafted by state Republican lawmakers violated the provisions of the federal Voting Rights Act.

Writing in his dissent, Thomas argued that the Supreme Court’s ruling that a section of the 1965 Voting Rights Act that bans gerrymandering based on race is "nothing more than a racial entitlement to roughly proportional control of elective offices—limited only by feasibility—wherever different racial groups consistently prefer different candidates."

He added, the Voting Rights Act doesn’t mandate that Alabama "intentionally redraw its longstanding congressional districts so that black voters can control a number of seats roughly proportional to the black share of the State’s population."
Ironic the court chose Thomas to express this dissenting point of view.
"At the outset, I would resolve these cases in a way that would not require the Federal Judiciary to decide the correct racial apportionment of Alabama’s congressional seats," Thomas further stated.

"The majority goes to great lengths ... to fossilize all of the worst aspects of our long-deplorable vote-dilution jurisprudence," Thomas also wrote, adding that "it virtually ignores Alabama’s primary argument—that, whatever the benchmark is, it must be race neutral—choosing, instead, to quixotically joust with an imaginary adversary."
The majority opinion is presented at the link.
Related:
Clarence Thomas: 2023-05-04 Liberal Supreme Court Justice Sotomayor Caught in Scandal
Clarence Thomas: 2023-04-18 Dem Rep. Porter: 'Congress Absolutely Can and Should Police the Supreme Court'
Clarence Thomas: 2023-03-02 Democrat Congressman Mocks God During Congressional Hearing — Makes Social Media Gaffe Afterward
Related:
Voting Rights Act: 2022-10-02 Stacey Abrams loses Georgia voting rights lawsuit on all counts
Voting Rights Act: 2022-09-07 '25,000 dead registrants': Why legal nonprofit is suing Soros-backed Michigan elections chief
Voting Rights Act: 2022-08-31 Black Americans File Federal Lawsuit Against NYC for Law Allowing Foreign Nationals to Vote
Posted by:Bobby

#1  Next thing you know the Feds will be disqualifying candidates so that they can limit our choices to folks they approve of.
Posted by: Super Hose   2023-06-12 12:32  

00:00