You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
China-Japan-Koreas
US Marines to Integrate Tech, Amphibious Power
2023-06-15
[Epoch Times] The U.S. Marine Corps is doubling down on integrating advanced technologies into its warfighting concepts to better counter power rivals such as China, according to the highest-ranking Marine officer. As a result, the Marine Corps will need to take on more risk to ensure greater battlefield rewards, according to Gen. David Berger, the commandant of the Marine Corps.

"It’s not necessarily the embracing of new ideas that’s hard. It’s letting go of the old," Berger said during a June 13 talk with The Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank. "We have to accept risk in certain areas and move very quickly if we’re going to stay in front."

Berger’s comments focused on the ongoing implementation of Force Design 2030, a program begun in 2020 with the goal of preparing the Marine Corps for a naval war against major adversaries such as China.

Chinese naval forces greatly outnumber the U.S. Navy in terms of surface combatants.

The United States has nearly 300 warships, though only about a third of that force might be available on any given day, and that third is spread across the entire globe. Only about 60 U.S. warships are deployed in the Indo-Pacific region.

A majority of China’s 350-strong fleet, meanwhile, is stationed within 300 miles of the country. That number rises to more than 600 vessels if the Chinese coast guard and maritime militia forces are counted.

Should a war break out in the Indo—Pacific, that means the United States would be starting at a sizable disadvantage.

According to Berger, naval power will only become more vital to ensuring the national interest in the coming decade, and the U.S. Marines will be central to that effort.

"Submarines, aircraft carriers, amphibious forces. Those three categories are what great naval powers have to have in order to protect their national interests," Berger said. "We need to go back to our naval roots and be naval. Not because it’s our roots, but because that’s how we’re most effective."
Posted by:Bobby

#8  I don’t think the quantity of Chinese ships is any more decisive than a Vietnam era body count was. Iran may also have more ships than we do. Iranian naval ships would mostly be Boghammard and dhows. It fits their strategy, but their navy is demonstrably not a match for ours.
We would love a Chinese naval strategy if it called for them to duke it out with us ship to ship. In reality, their shore to ship missiles and drones would be a more significant threat. I don’t think their sub contingent will be decisive. If there was a war, I expect that we would lose some ships, but for them to lose most of their ships. It would not be Praying Mantis, nor would it be Midway. If the Chinese were to try an amphibious take over of Taiwan, I would expect that few troops would land alive unless Taiwan and the US succumbed to the most significant threat, Chinese infiltration of our governments and military.
As for the Marine Corp tanks, they were somewhat useful in both Iraq wars. I am not sure where the planners see the Marines being used in the future. Hopefully, Milley’s plan to invade Iran was retired with him. If he has not retired yet, let’s expedite that paperwork.
Posted by: Super Hose   2023-06-15 12:27  

#7  Berger needs to re-read the Wake Island experience on what happens to small, cut-off defensive units once isolated and assaulted. In trying to be meore "naval" he is asking for smaller, amphib transport vessels for the China-centric EABO concept described below.

"The Navy’s Medium Landing Ship (LSM) program, previously called the Light Amphibious Warship (LAW) program, envisions procuring a class of 18 to 35 new amphibious ships to support the Marine Corps, particularly in implementing a new Marine Corps operational concept called Expeditionary Advanced Base Operations (EABO)"...

"The EABO concept was developed with an eye toward potential conflict scenarios with China in the Western Pacific. Under the concept, the Marine Corps envisions, among other things, having reinforced-platoon-sized Marine Corps units maneuver around the theater, moving from island to island, to fire anti-ship cruise missiles (ASCMs) and perform other missions so as to contribute, alongside Navy and other U.S. military forces, to U.S. operations to counter and deny sea control to Chinese forces. The LSMs would be instrumental to these operations, with LSMs embarking, transporting, landing, and subsequently reembarking these small Marine Corps units."

Report to Congress on Navy Medium Landing Ship
Posted by: NoMoreBS   2023-06-15 11:42  

#6  The US Marine Corps doesn't want to be carved up like a thanksgiving turkey by the Pentagon bureaucrats. The Iron Law of (Pentagon) Budgets is that the Army, the Navy and the Air Force each gets a third of the pie -- this makes life quieter for the REMFs because they don't have to fight for each program as hard. The USMC as a "combined arm force" had toys the other services claimed control of: the USAF's airplanes and the Army's tanks. The Navy has historically been willing to fight for USMC airplanes, but the others...
Posted by: magpie   2023-06-15 11:32  

#5  But what about pronouns?
Posted by: AlanC   2023-06-15 10:55  

#4  The Marine Corps is going to great lengths to make sure that they're never forced to deploy as an alternate Army unit again.
Posted by: ed in texas   2023-06-15 10:40  

#3  naval-gazing

from The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, 5th Edition.

noun Excessive introspection, self-absorption, or concentration on a single issue.

from Wiktionary, Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License.

noun derogatory Excessive focus on oneself; introspection.

from WordNet 3.0 Copyright 2006 by Princeton University. All rights reserved.

noun literally, the contemplation of one's navel, which is an idiom usually meaning complacent self-absorption


Posted by: Skidmark   2023-06-15 09:39  

#2  "We need to go back to our naval roots and be naval..." Oh, sure. In the emerging age of robotics and missile technology let's return to our naval roots.
Posted by: Slavising Unineting5672   2023-06-15 09:27  

#1  That's why they gave up their tanks?
Posted by: Skidmark   2023-06-15 09:06  

00:00