You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Lurid Crime Tales-
How a WWII Japanese sub commander helped exonerate a U.S. Navy captain
2023-06-28
[WaPo] Just 34 days before the end of World War II, a U.S. Navy cruiser was torpedoed by a Japanese submarine and sunk in the Philippine Sea.

The USS Indianapolis had been the ship of state of President Franklin D. Roosevelt and had just delivered core components of the Hiroshima-bound atomic bomb "Little Boy" four days earlier.

After unloading her top-secret cargo at Tinian and then making a quick stop in Guam to await further orders, the crew of the Indy were soon bound for the Philippine island of Leyte, unaware that their location had just been discovered by an enemy submarine.

A Japanese sonar man had picked up on the sound of rattling dishes in her kitchen from some six miles away. The submarine began stalking her through the water until it was close enough to engage.

The sub’s commanding officer, Mochitsura Hashimoto, gave the order to fire six torpedoes into her side at 12:04 a.m. on July 30, 1945. Two of the torpedoes hit their mark, and it took the Indy just 12 minutes to capsize and sink, forever entombing some 300 of her 1,195-man crew 18,044 feet beneath the surface of the moonlit water.

For the next five days, the nearly 900 sailors who had survived the sinking found their numbers whittled down as crew member after crew member fell victim to saltwater poisoning, drowning, delirium and shark attacks. Only 316 survived the horrific ordeal...

Their collective rescue took about 24 hours to complete — leaving some survivors in the water for five harrowing days. One of the discovered clusters of men included the Indy’s captain, Charles McVay...

Despite the nightmare he’d just experienced and survived at sea, McVay soon found himself in a different kind of fight — this one with the United States Navy.

The Navy had bungled many things regarding the Indianapolis and knew it: It denied McVay the escort he’d requested for protection while traveling through enemy waters; it did not respond to any of the distress signals sent from the Indy that listed her coordinates in the final moments of her sinking (the Navy has since disputed receiving any distress signals, though multiple servicemen claimed to have received them); it did not recognize or report that the Indy had not arrived at Leyte when she was scheduled to; and it had provided McVay with an incomplete intelligence report...

"The conviction meant that of the almost 400 U.S. captains whose ships had been sunk during the war, McVay was the only one to have been court-martialed," Stanton said. Indeed, he was the only captain in the history of the Navy to be court-martialed for the loss of a ship sunk by an act of war.

That distinction stayed with McVay for the rest of his life as he endured anguished letter after anguished letter ("Hate mail," Indy survivor Granville Crane Jr. later called it), from the families of the fallen sailors whose deaths had been blamed on him. "He read every letter he received and took them all personally," Stanton said.

In the end, McVay took his own life on Nov. 6, 1968, with a gift from his father of a toy sailor clutched in his hand....

Congress voted to exonerate McVay on Oct. 12, 2000. Hashimoto died 13 days later....
Posted by:DooDahMan

#6  Virtue signaling?
Posted by: Skidmark   2023-06-28 19:36  

#5  Interesting comments, Mike, thanks!
Posted by: DooDahMan   2023-06-28 13:27  

#4  "The longest wait of my life, waitin' for my turn, ya know. I'll never go into the water in a life jacket again."

- Quint, Jaws
Posted by: M. Murcek   2023-06-28 10:32  

#3  ...The impression I've gotten from several books on the subject (and this is IMHO, YMMV of course) is that CAPT McVey probably would have (for lack of a better term) walked away from the loss of Indianapolis - there was enough ambiguity in his orders to cause doubt as to his culpability, and more than enough command and control failures to hold higher authority far more responsible.

On the other hand, there were a great many Indianapolis families who found out about their losses on VJ Day - I cannot imagine the sheer horror of getting up that morning believing that they were safe and they'd made it...only to find out that they weren't. Many of these families, once some of the details leaked out - and they did - went straight to their Congressmen and Senators demanding to know why McVey wasn't being held responsible.

There was also the matter of FADM Ernest King, Chief Of Naval Operations, who famously never met a grudge he couldn't hold. He had been disciplined many years before by CAPT McVey's father, and although there's no paperwork proving it conclusively, FADM King almost violently - even for him - shot down every suggestion that McVey be shown leniency. One can make an argument that embarassment and anger over the circumstances figured in as well, but there never seemed to be any doubt among King's staff that his treatment by McVey's father figured into this.

Mike
Posted by: MikeKozlowski   2023-06-28 10:27  

#2  "The job of the committee is to protect the committee..."
Posted by: M. Murcek   2023-06-28 09:14  

#1  I see finding scapegoats to protect the higher-ups is a time-honored tradition.

Shame on the USN.
Posted by: DooDahMan   2023-06-28 08:55  

00:00