You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
Inside the forgotten third World Trade building occupied by CIA that burned down on 9/11
2023-09-12
[NYT] In the annals of history, the vivid and horrifying images of the Twin Towers collapsing on that fateful Sept. 11, 2001, are etched into the collective memory of Americans.

But amid the chaos and devastation of that day, there’s one building that often remains shrouded in obscurity, its significance relegated to the shadows — World Trade Center 7.

On that same day, as the sun dipped below the horizon at 5:20 p.m., Building 7 crumbled to the ground.

Astonishingly, this skyscraper had not been struck by an airplane, and fires raged on only a few of its floors.

The reason behind its collapse has long been a subject of contention, with many questioning the official narrative.
Posted by:Besoeker

#7  â€¦occupied by the CIA that burned it down….

Funny, how all those columns failed simultaneously.
Posted by: KBK   2023-09-12 21:13  

#6  I seem to recall photographs of numerous people described as Agency employees going through the rubble and paper litter around the build looking for classified material. They were all wearing EFFBEYE standard windbreakers and the notation was that the New York Station was clandestine so they had to pose as Bureau agents.
Posted by: NoMoreBS   2023-09-12 18:34  

#5  I've also read it was because of the seismic result of the trade centers collapsing.
Posted by: Deacon Blues   2023-09-12 15:53  

#4  A bunch of engineers from the Institute of Northern Engineering based out of the University of Alaska Fairbanks drafted/authored a White Paper that does not blame fire and concludes:

The collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building.

White Paper Here
Posted by: mossomo   2023-09-12 12:45  

#3  The contention is based on two different engineering theories. The NIST says the steel in the main supports weakened because of the fire. Other say that auxiliary columns failed and that was the main problem.
Posted by: lord garth    2023-09-12 08:32  

#2  Certain day in Dallas?
Posted by: Grom the Reflective   2023-09-12 07:19  

#1  Many important records and documents could have been lost. We may learn a great deal more in 50-60 years or so.
Posted by: Besoeker   2023-09-12 05:58  

00:00