You have commented 358 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Land of the Free
Supreme Court rejects Jack Smith's request to fast-track decision on Trump presidential ‘immunity'
2023-12-23
[Independent] The US Supreme Court has declined to weigh in on Donald Trump’s "presidential immunity" defence until an appeals court reviews the case.

The refusal on Friday from the nation’s highest court follows a request from special counsel Jack Smith to make a swift and "definitive" ruling on whether the former president can claim "immunity" from prosecution for crimes allegedly committed while in office.

The DC Circuit Court of Appeals will hear oral arguments on the "immunity" defence on 9 January.

A federal grand jury indictment charges Mr Trump for his alleged attempts to subvert the outcome of the 2020 presidential election, including his failure to stop a mob of his supporters from breaking into the US Capitol to stop the certification of the results on January 6.

The federal judge overseeing the case has rejected Mr Trump’s arguments, and Mr Trump has vowed to appeal.

The Supreme Court’s response tells the parties that the justices won’t get involved in the case, for now.

The justices did not cite a reason for the decision.
Related:
Jack Smith: 2023-12-14 Kash Patel on Holding Bad Actors Accountable and the Assault on Presidential Privilege
Jack Smith: 2023-12-14 BREAKING: Judge Halts January 6 Case Against Trump
Jack Smith: 2023-11-30 Federal Judge Orders FBI To Finally Release Seth Rich's Laptop
Posted by:Besoeker

#4  Jack Smith was trying to take his a small part of his case to the supreme court to give his judge an opportunity to find Trump guilty. I'm glad the supreme court will not play lackey politics.
Posted by: 49 Pan   2023-12-23 15:11  

#3  Our country hasn’t seen this level of a hack since Jack Reynolds’s sawed a car apart in anger after a football loss.
Posted by: Super Hose   2023-12-23 10:08  

#2  Punt
Posted by: Procopius2k   2023-12-23 07:26  

#1  One thing the SCOTUS will not do is step on the lower courts by bypassing the process. Gotta let it play out.

Then they will smack the shit out of the lower court's opinion.
Posted by: DarthVader   2023-12-23 01:20  

00:00