| Submit your comments on this article |
| Home Front: Politix |
| National Guard would be able to use FORCE against armed migrants entering the U.S. under new bill from Navy SEAL veteran Republican congressman |
| 2024-02-03 |
|
| Posted by:Skidmark |
| #7 Yse of Force and Law Enforcement role has always been available to the National Guard. Title 32 vs Title 10. In a Title 32 federal active duty status, troops are under the command of the Governor and exempt from Posse Commitatus restrictions. All of the deployed troops were armed, I actually wrote the initial ROE (Rules of Engagement) and arming orders at the start of the deployment. In a state active duty status, National Guard troops are funded and directed as state employees, and have no federal linkages. During the 91 L.A. riots, California National Guard troops, were initially in a Title 32 status and those troops that were were integrated with LAPD and LASD patrol units for riot control and law enforcement ops were fully armed. Their conversion to Title 10 with the arrival of federal troops severely reduced their use and LE integration. |
| Posted by: NoMoreBS 2024-02-03 11:38 |
| #6 why armed? they are all invaders. although i would accept sponsored families but no one with neck or face tattoos. |
| Posted by: irish rage boy 2024-02-03 10:41 |
| #5 Maybe with a fresh conflict he'll be too busy trading stocks to notice. |
| Posted by: swksvolFF 2024-02-03 10:08 |
| #4 Eyepatch McCain will vote with the dems to kill it. |
| Posted by: M. Murcek 2024-02-03 08:36 |
| #3 Hochul urged to send National Guard troops to southern border |
| Posted by: Skidmark 2024-02-03 08:20 |
| #2 Rep. Morgan Luttrell, a former Navy SEAL Morgan is the twin brother of Marcus. He's seen it up close. |
| Posted by: Skidmark 2024-02-03 08:01 |
| #1 They're not serious about protecting the homeland. We're way beyond being simps for the world. |
| Posted by: Procopius2k 2024-02-03 07:50 |