You have commented 358 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Government Corruption
Federal Judge Denies Jack Smith Request To Keep Officials' Names, Departments Sealed
2024-02-08
[ET via ZERO] On Feb. 6, U.S. District Court Judge Aileen Cannon
... the Colombian-born American lawyer serves in the Southern District of Florida. She started out doing corporate law, then was a federal prosecutor, so she knows all the tricks...
ordered the unsealing of some names and information about government officials, granting in part a motion by former President Donald Trump to unseal a partially redacted version of his motion to compel prosecutors to hand over evidence.

"The parties are reminded of the strong presumption of public access in criminal proceedings," the judge wrote, ordering that no unclassified material in the case be filed under seal going forward.

All filings under full or partial seal will require approval from the judge in the future, unless there are "clear and supported cases of risk to personal safety or national security."

The case, prosecuted by
sneaky little shit
special counsel Jack Smith, has been dominated by a battle for documents, extending the pre-trial motions stage and delaying what would have been a May 20 trial. Last year, President Trump pleaded not guilty to 40 counts related to allegedly mishandling classified documents.

On Jan. 16, President Trump filed multiple motions to compel discovery and attached several exhibits under seal. Some of these were emails obtained through the Freedom of Information Act and containing names and identifying information about government officials, which defense attorneys argue show that the prosecution and the Biden administration have colluded to target President Trump.

The defense attorneys have asked to unseal this information, and a coalition of news media companies have sought to intervene to request the same, both arguing that court filings are "matters of public record."

The special counsel’s office has opposed both requests, arguing that there are witness safety and intimidation concerns.

Referencing the First Amendment, Judge Cannon found that "the Special Counsel has not set forth a sufficient factual or legal basis warranting deviation from the strong presumption in favor of public access to the records at issue."

She found the prosecutors’ arguments "sparse and undifferentiated" and lacking the facts she needed to weigh their arguments.
Related:
Jack Smith: 2024-02-03 Trump trial delayed indefinitely in case stemming from Special Counsel Jack Smith's Jan. 6 investigation
Jack Smith: 2024-01-14 FBI Defies Court Order – Refuses to Turn Over Seth Rich Evidence to Attorney
Jack Smith: 2024-01-09 Prosecutor on Special Counsel Jack Smith's Team Shut Down FBI Investigation into the Clinton Foundation in 2016
Related:
Aileen Cannon: 2023-06-12 So you think they've got Trump right where they want him, eh?
Aileen Cannon: 2022-10-06 Trump Files Emergency Appeal With SCOTUS
Aileen Cannon: 2022-09-22 US court lifts hold on classified records in Donald Trump investigation
Posted by:Besoeker

00:01