You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Short Attention Span Theater-
Incest Is Best? The Economist Says Copulating-Cousins Cool ‘In Most Cases’
2024-02-18
[ZERO] With America facing population collapse thanks to a pandemic which compounded already-shrinking birth rates, petrified young men who don't want to get #MeToo'd for trying to get past 1st base, and record numbers of young Americans identifying as anything but heterosexual, The Economist wants you to know that it's "probably fine" to bang your cousin, which they also note is "illegal in 25 American states."
Cousin marriages among Pakistani Moslem immigrants has resulted in a significantly larger portion of birth defects among their babies compared to British babies as a whole than the Brit-Pakistani portion of the general population.
After a dig at Kentucky for a 'quickly withdrawn' proposal to remove "first cousin" from the state list of incestuous family relations, the article goes on to 'ackshually' explain that the risk of genetic mutations among the offspring of first cousins is 'greater' than non-incest relations, however 'the increase is quite small.'
When dealing with a strong cultural preference coupled with a tradition of arranged marriages that has been going on for over a millennium, the results are catastrophic.
Justifying 'kissing cousins' further, The Economist suggests that it's unfair to prevent incest because "Many other couples face far higher risks of genetic complications for their offspring, and those unions are not banned," such as people with recessive genes for certain disorders, such as sickle-cell anemia or cystic fibrosis, their offspring has a 25% chance of being born with that disorder, "Yet those marriages are allowed."

"The law against first-cousin marriage is a major form of discrimination," said University of Washington Department of Medicine Director of Genetic Counseling, Robin Bennett (M.S., CGC, (she/her)).
Director Bennett is a posturing, parochial fool.
Counselling Directory UK adds:
Research done at Quaid-e-Azam University in Islamabad (the capital of Pakistain) states that more than half of the population of Pakistain marries their first cousin. This is a common practice globally in many cultures and countries, but it is far more common in Pakistain than in any other country with a high percentage of 55-60% marrying their first cousins.

For British Paks, moving away from their hometown and leaving behind family is not easy. Many start a fresh life in the UK but eventually become fearful that they will lose their cultural values and, as a way to stay connected, they encourage or even force their children to marry back home within the family. This is an attempt to keep family ties strong and maintain family relationships.

Others will frown upon the British culture i.e. clubbing, dating, pre-marital sexual relationships and as a way to prevent their children from engaging, consanguineous marriages will take place.

Many in the community are unaware of the tragic consequences of cousin marriages.

Genetic conditions can affect anyone, but the problem arises when the couple (related) both carry abnormal genes. If the baby inherits the gene from the father and the mother, in which case chances of the baby being born with genetic disorders will be higher, mental and or physical. If the baby is born healthy, then the father and mother may not carry the gene or the baby did not inherit it.

In Bradford, one of the largest Pak communities in Britannia, 75% of Paks marry their first cousins, anywhere between 4 and 10% of the children in these families will be born with genetic abnormalities, these illnesses are often fatal.

One-third of children with diseases caused by recessive genes will die before they turn five.

More than 70 published British scientific studies have shown that cousin marriages lead to an increased chance of having a child born with a rare genetic disorder. A significant number of these children will have serious kidney or liver problems. Many genetic and mental disorders are progressive with age and time and there is no permanent cure for these children.
Deafness among Pakistani-Brit babies is a serious problem.
With growing awareness of these facts and figures, over the past two decades, the practice of cousin marriages has reduced within some groups, but the custom continues. The older generation does not see an issue with consanguine marriages and believes that this practice keeps the bond and love intact between families.

Views of the younger generation have changed with education and knowledge, whereas about 20 years ago most people did not oppose consanguineous marriages. It is slowly becoming outdated.
Related:
Incest: 2024-02-09 Liberty, Equality and Fraternity. The greatest scam in history
Incest: 2023-11-23 First pics of Walmart shooter Benjamin Jones emerge
Incest: 2023-08-11 White supremacist charged with threatening jurors, witnesses in Tree of Life trial
Related:
First cousin marriage: 2023-04-05 The 19 US states where you can still marry your cousin - despite the risk of children suffering genetic defects like extra fingers and toes
Related:
Cousin marriage: 2007-09-13 Good morning
Posted by:Besoeker

#9  Uh oh; Hunter story about to drop.
Posted by: swksvolFF   2024-02-18 17:55  

#8  Yes, they seem to have doubled up on the grift gene.

Is it a good gene or a bad gene?
Posted by: M. Murcek   2024-02-18 10:49  

#7  I guess I may have castigated the Bidens unnecessarily.
Posted by: Super Hose   2024-02-18 10:47  

#6  In animal husbandry, you can eat the results of your failed experiments.

Legalize cannibalism and that solves that issue.
Posted by: DarthVader   2024-02-18 10:44  

#5  There are some advantages to cousin marriages. In a clan-based society, it keeps the wealth inside the clan and avoids inheriting political entanglements.

From a genetic standpoint, it increases your offspring's chances of getting two copies of a good gene. Animal breeders do this all the time.

It also increases the chances of getting two copies of a bad gene. This is ungood. In animal husbandry, you can eat the results of your failed experiments. With humans, the results continue to make copies of themselves. This is double plus ungood.
Posted by: SteveS   2024-02-18 10:22  

#4  I'd walk on the other side of the state to avoid my sister and her cousins.
Posted by: Skidmark   2024-02-18 08:26  

#3  Seem to also ignore hundreds of years of European royalty and aristocracy inbreeding.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2024-02-18 08:04  

#2  Well, the people who write and read The Economist are inbred already, so...
Posted by: M. Murcek   2024-02-18 07:44  

#1  Inbreeding is cool - Muslims do it all the time.
Posted by: Grom the Reflective   2024-02-18 01:02  

00:00