You have commented 358 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Lurid Crime Tales-
Would-be robber, Chicago jewelry store worker who shot him both released without charges
2024-02-28
[FoxNews] After a worker opened fire on a would-be robber at a jewelry store downtown this past weekend, police took both the worker and the robbery suspect into custody.

CBS 2 reached out to the person who fired the shot, and others inside a jewelry store at 1 N. Wabash Ave. along Jewelers Row. No one wanted to talk on camera, but CBS 2 Legal Analyst Irv Miller said this was a clear case of self-defense on the employee's part.

The robbery happened just before 11 a.m. Saturday.

Surveillance video shows the would-be robber, who wore a red sweatshirt, walking around for about a minute before he took off running toward the entrance.

He began to bash in a glass case, and that's when the employee reached behind the counter and began shooting at the man before he tried to get away.

"The moment that person took an object and broke that glass, that person was committing a forcible felony," said CBS 2 Legal Analyst Irv Miller. "He was no longer walking around checking the place out."

For that reason, Miller said under the law, the employee legally defended himself and his business – even though the suspected robber was leaving when he was shot.

"The person in the store who was working there had the right to use deadly force under Illinois law, and Illinois law is very specific as to what constitutes self-defense," Miller said.

The statute reads clearly, "A person is justified in the use of force… to prevent imminent death… or commission of forcible felony" – and the category of "forcible felony" includes "robbery, burglary,"

After getting shot, the suspected robber is seen stumbling out the door. He circles back to pick up something he dropped before running up to the platform the Chicago Transit Authority Loop 'L' tracks – bleeding.

The employee who fired had a concealed carry license – and that protected him, according to Miller.

"If this person who did the firing didn't have a concealed carry; didn't have an FOID card, that store owner; store employee, would have been charged with a weapons violation - a felony," Miller said.

CBS 2 checked late Monday with Chicago Police, who said both the store clerk and the suspected robber were released without any charges. But police said the case is still under investigation.
Posted by:Skidmark

#13  The law is now like trying to nail down a blob of mercury. Existing precedent is no guarantee of a similar outcome in the future.
Posted by: M. Murcek   2024-02-28 16:44  

#12  I was skeptical of Miller's comments, but looking on line he's been admitted to the bar since 1975 and his specialty is criminal defense.
Posted by: Too Old To Work   2024-02-28 14:43  

#11  Let the felon flee seems ill advised with respect to rape and other violent crimes. Releasing illegal immigrants that we can’t even identify seems like a bad plan as well.
Posted by: Super Hose   2024-02-28 12:57  

#10  ^That's why the progressives been beating you like a drum for a 100 years!
Posted by: Grom the Reflective   2024-02-28 12:13  

#9  It'd be a real quandary for me if I was a potential juror sitting through the jury selection process. No way in hell could I vote to convict somebody trying to protect his business by shooting a robber. But they make you promise under penalty of perjury to tell the lawyers the truth when they ask if you can be impartial. My heart would tell me to lie so I could free that worker but my head would want me to tell the truth so I could be excused from jury service.
Posted by: Abu Uluque   2024-02-28 11:58  

#8  That jewelry store worker would still be in jail if his store was in California.
Posted by: Abu Uluque   2024-02-28 11:51  

#7   most classroom training cautions individuals NOT to shoot a fleeing felon

Now where is the sport in that? I swear, some people just want to suck the joy out of life.
Posted by: SteveS   2024-02-28 11:33  

#6  Mutual combat
Posted by: Rex Mundi   2024-02-28 10:43  

#5  ...you mean like getting a jury to convict?
Posted by: Procopius2k   2024-02-28 10:29  

#4  Yikes ... I wouldn't take legal advice from Miller. The video seemingly shows only crimes against property, no life-threatening threat to any individual working in the store. I don't see anyone being threatened or put in jeopardy by "lethal force." YMMV. Regardless of Illinois law as read by Miller, most classroom training cautions individuals NOT to shoot a fleeing felon, in part because that individual is no longer a threat. Honestly, I suspect that politics more than legalities controlled the charging decision.
Posted by: Jolusing Hatfield1692   2024-02-28 09:18  

#3  Most likely sales district or contract disputes. Nothing personal, just binness.
Posted by: Besoeker   2024-02-28 09:05  

#2  ^^ Final Weekend Tally: 6 killed, 25 wounded
Posted by: Mullah Richard   2024-02-28 09:02  

#1  At Least 21 Shot During Weekend in Mayor Brandon Johnson’s Chicago
Posted by: Skidmark   2024-02-28 05:49  

00:00