You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Great Cultural Revolution
The Feminization of the Army
2024-03-17
[American Thinker] I read The Feminization of America a few weeks ago, and that theme has been bouncing around my cranial cavity ever since.

We may be headed for a significant war shortly, one that will require rapid expansion of our forces. The Army can only do that through the draft. Now that women can serve in ground maneuver units, will we draft women?

There needs to be a national discussion on this issue. When then Secretary of Defense Ashton Carter, faced with an impending lawsuit concerning women in combat, signed off on opening combat arms to women, it was a bureaucratic action done without congressional approval or national discourse. The Defense Advisory Committee on Women in the Services (DACOWITS) has ramrodded this agenda.

The considerations surrounding this are immensely complex. While equality and equity are undoubtedly important, so are biological necessities. The United Kingdom’s "Lost Generation" deeply affected its culture and future. This author is the result of the loss of German men during World War II, as my German mother met my American father when he was stationed there in the early 1950s. Combat and strategic bombings killed most of her male contemporaries.

Can a nation survive if it takes catastrophic losses of women during their vital child-bearing ages? This is a question of biological necessity: who will populate the next war’s boomer generation?

If we now allow women to serve in the maneuver combat arms, equality and equity demand that young women sign up for the draft as do their male counterparts. As the father of a daughter, I am a firm "no" on this issue, yet my daughter is a serving Navy surface warfare officer of whom I am immensely proud. Talk about being conflicted on this issue.

Further compounding this topic is the physiological difference highlighted by current discussions of whether transwomen should participate in women’s sports? Biological male differences give greater strength and speed to transwomen (XY) than their competition, whose genetic makeup is XX.

If biologically, men are stronger and faster than women, wouldn’t placing women on the physically arduous ground gaining combat arms (infantry and armor) units be counterproductive? Further impacting this issue is the quota system that the Army euphemistically clouds as "goals" of requiring at least two female officers or noncommissioned officers into each combat arms company.
Posted by:Besoeker

#9  We'll agree to disagree. Prior to WW2, the central government was loath to have any large size army and kept it to a bare minimum to man the frontier and coastal installations. It was only expanded during conflicts and quickly demobilized thereafter. As a small volunteer force it was more self selected than a cross section of society.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2024-03-17 17:51  

#8  Quite frankly you are wrong. Blacks, women, gays, trannies, and now women in combat arms all led or followed within a decade of society changes. Women fought for equal rights, and they are getting it. Along with it comes the cost of being equal to men. The stress, bad health, responsibility outside the home, and yes combat. The women that will serve and possibly drafted into combat can thank their dope smoking free love grand parents for their new position in life. This all falls under the be careful what you ask for rule.

And to no more Euro's comment, you are exactly right. The women's movement, LGBTQXYZ, BLM, and the woke agenda has the same end state of emasculating the American male. We see it in society every day, in our grade schools where they are cutting and drugging our boys into freaks of nature, becoming neither a man or a woman, just an confused and emasculated person that have no future and is suicidal.
Posted by: 49 Pan   2024-03-17 16:02  

#7  What they really want is a bunch of robocops.
Posted by: Grom the Reflective   2024-03-17 12:49  

#6  Not feminization. EMASCULATION.

Big difference.
Posted by: no mo uro   2024-03-17 12:36  

#5  The Army is a reflection of our society, always has been.

Hmm...not quite. It's a nice homily but the jigsaw piece doesn't fit the puzzle.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2024-03-17 12:28  

#4  The Army is a reflection of our society, always has been. If you dont like the make up of the Army then our society needs to stop bitching and fix itself. You cant just glorify feminism and the tans culture, then say the military is for men only. America gets what it asks for. Good luck...
Posted by: 49 Pan   2024-03-17 12:14  

#3  
Posted by: badanov   2024-03-17 11:02  

#2  The Defense Advisory Committee on Women in the Services (DACOWITS) has ramrodded this agenda.

'The cow wits'
The jokes write themselves!
Posted by: Skidmark   2024-03-17 08:46  

#1  The Feminization Karening of the Army

Have they finally gotten around to establishing a single physical fitness test for everyone? Didn't 20 years of deployments actually tell you what condition you needed to be in a hostile environment? 4000+ years of war and its still butchery.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2024-03-17 07:50  

00:00