Submit your comments on this article |
Government Corruption |
U.S. Supreme Court rules Obiden administration cannot be sued for censorship |
2024-06-27 |
![]() The ruling, written by Justice Amy Coney Barrett, came down with the following key decision: "Neither the individual nor the state plaintiffs have established Article III standing to seek an injunction against any defendant." In sum, the court rules that the two different types of parties, states, and individuals harmed by these government policies, do not have ’standing’ to sue. This case procedurally related to the request for a preliminary injunction for the government to stop the censorship regime while the case was going on. This decision will make the trial court action in this case more difficult but, insiders say, not impossible. "It’s a horrible decision, but the underlying case at the lower court marches forward. The Gateway Pundit is dedicated to fighting the government for the free speech rights of everyone, we are committed to ultimate victory," said John Burns, General Counsel for the Gateway Pundit. |
Posted by:Besoeker |
#7 No idea either, but we're gonna find out. |
Posted by: Rex Mundi 2024-06-27 20:27 |
#6 #4: secession didn't work. Revolution did. No idea if either would again. |
Posted by: Glenmore 2024-06-27 17:58 |
#5 #4: it is becoming more relevant each day. If Trump is denied i see secession looming. |
Posted by: irish rage boy 2024-06-27 17:06 |
#4 Procop, the simple (simplistic?) answer is the one that goes something like... "That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness." If the legal protections of the Constitution are inadequate, the fall back is the Declaration of Independence |
Posted by: Mercutio 2024-06-27 09:38 |
#3 Fine. We'll just shoot them then. |
Posted by: DarthVader 2024-06-27 09:07 |
#2 I don't know how there could be a stronger case but we will see. If Congress and President are Republican, a law could be passed. But then if a Dem came later they could just ignore the law. Pretty depressing. |
Posted by: Lord Garth 2024-06-27 08:45 |
#1 So who and how does one get 'standing' when the government conspires to suppress the 1st Amendment? Notice they left that out. |
Posted by: Procopius2k 2024-06-27 08:04 |