You have commented 358 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Economy
Federal Court Finds Google is a Monopolist in Relevant Markets
2024-08-06
[Epoch Times] In a landmark legal decision, a federal judge ruled that Google violated antitrust laws by maintaining its monopoly power in the markets for general search services and general search text advertisements.

The ruling, issued on Aug. 5 by Judge Amit Mehta, concludes a lengthy legal battle initiated by the U.S. Department of Justice and a coalition of state attorneys general.
Where have we heard that judge's name before?
The case against Google, filed in October 2020, alleged that the tech giant engaged in anti-competitive practices by establishing exclusive agreements with browser developers, mobile device manufacturers, and wireless carriers.

These agreements prohibited partners from pre-installing rival search engines, leading most U.S. devices to come preloaded exclusively with Google, forcing competitors to find alternative ways to reach users.

The court said Google’s conduct allowed the company to charge "supracompetitive prices for general search text ads," enabling it to earn substantial monopoly profits.

Google said in a statement to The Epoch Times that "this decision recognizes that Google offers the best search engine, but concludes that we shouldn’t be allowed to make it easily available.
Boo hoo.
To be fair, not everyone recognizes Google as the best search engine, just the biggest.
The case is seen as the most significant antitrust trial of the century.

The ruling suggests the possibility of structural relief as a remedy, involving changes to Google’s business operations, such as altering or terminating exclusive agreements that make Google’s search engine the default option.

While the court ruling does not specify breaking up the company, potential remedies will be determined in subsequent proceedings.
Related:
Amit Mehta 05/15/2024 Call them racist? Teachers union worked with feds to neutralize parents with concerns about CRT
Amit Mehta 06/12/2023 Oath Keepers Leader and Political Prisoner Stewart Rhodes Reacts to Trump Indictment – And Predicts What Is Coming Next (AUDIO)
Amit Mehta 03/21/2023 Four Oath Keeper associates convicted of felonies for roles in US Reichstag Capitol attack

Posted by:Bobby

#4  .. a judge on the United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court..

Me: OMG! So is this ruling unrelated or is the judge playing some benefit angle?
Posted by: 3dc   2024-08-06 17:40  

#3  Donald Trump says Google ‘has to be careful’ or it will be ‘shut down’ / Let’s trace the straight line from Peter Thiel to now.
Posted by: Skidmark   2024-08-06 10:21  

#2  for giggles, use Brave Search [AI] and ask "Why is Google Evil?"

Fairly comprehensive response.
Posted by: Mercutio   2024-08-06 09:07  

#1  Google's online search monopoly is illegal, US judge rules
Posted by: Skidmark   2024-08-06 06:50  

00:00