You have commented 358 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Government Corruption
Judge rules military can't disqualify enlistees with HIV
2024-08-23
[Washington Examiner] The U.S. military can no longer disqualify recruits who have undetectable viral loads of HIV from serving in the military.

U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema ruled on Tuesday that the Pentagon’s arguments barring HIV-positive individuals from military service were not "supported by the evidence."
Clinton Appointee
"Defendants’ policies prohibiting the accession of asymptomatic HIV-positive individuals with undetectable viral loads are irrational, arbitrary and capricious," the judge wrote. "Even worse, they contribute to the ongoing stigma surrounding HIV-positive individuals while actively hampering the military’s own recruitment goals."

Brinkema previously ruled in 2022 that the Defense Department could not prevent service members diagnosed after enlisting from deploying in active duty outside the continental U.S. nor from being commissioned as officers.

Three plaintiffs who were either barred from entry or who were already enlisted and denied promotion due to their HIV status in this recent case argued that the Defense Department’s policy was unlawful based upon the due process of the Fifth Amendment and the Administrative Procedure Act.

In defending its policy, the Defense Department listed that an asymptomatic HIV- positive individual still could pose risk to the military’s mission for they may not be taking their medicine on a regimented basis which could lead to their viral loads rising; HIV which is incurable could be transmitted to other service members either through "blood spatters or transfusions" and those living with HIV could suffer greater comorbidities impacting their health and ability to serve.

The Pentagon also raised concerns that the military would endure "significant costs" in order to pay for the HIV treatment of HIV-positive individuals. Antiretroviral costs are estimated to be between $10,000 and $25,000 per person annually.
Posted by:Besoeker

#8  Ref #5: And who underpins UAE policy, which serves the interest of whom? A glance at the CIA super secret checkbook would tell the tale.

Beta testing for what we know today as DEI began in DoD 35-40 years ago.
Posted by: Besoeker   2024-08-23 13:48  

#7  Congress can pass a law restricting the purview of the judiciary, but won't.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2024-08-23 13:15  

#6  Congress could pass a law in support of the DOD policy, if Congress was into passing legislation - which they are not.
Posted by: Gromble+Dribble4342   2024-08-23 13:01  

#5  US Military has become a Jobs and Healthcare Program.
Posted by: mossomo   2024-08-23 12:48  

#4  Shouldn't there be a mRNA solution to HIV?
Posted by: Skidmark   2024-08-23 08:53  

#3  They're likely getting antiretrovirals from the DOD healthcare ($10,000 and $25,000 per person annually)
Posted by: Frank G   2024-08-23 06:31  

#2  
While I agree, clean Blood on any battlefield is a must. Because donations can be Arm to Arm in some cases.

Please explain if it's undetectable how can it be used to ban a recruit?
Posted by: NN2N1   2024-08-23 04:48  

#1  Is there anything American ruling class won't do to sabotage American military?
Posted by: Grom the Reflective   2024-08-23 03:54  

00:00