You have commented 358 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Government Corruption
Ten Years and $7.5 Billion Later, No New Water Storage in California
2025-02-21
[Breitbart] No new water storage infrastructure has been built in California, more than a decade after voters approved a $7.5 billion water bond in Proposition 1 of 2014.

The San Jose Mercury-News reported Wednesday that officials are deciding what to do with nearly half a billion dollars of available cash after the “collapse” of a project to expand the Los Vaqueros Reservoir, which is east of San Francisco.

Other projects have received funding for planning and permitting, but nothing has been built.

The newspaper noted:

A majority of the seven board members of the California Water Commission, a state agency that distributes funding to build reservoirs and other water projects, indicated they are leaning toward dividing up the $453 million left over from the Los Vaqueros project and giving it this year to six other major new reservoir and groundwater storage projects currently on the drawing board around the state.



The bond can provide up to half the costs of projects, which are designed to store more water in wet years to offset shortages in cities and farms during droughts. But they have been slowed by the COVID pandemic, cost increases due to inflation, permitting delays and other problems, including the inability of local water agencies sponsoring them to come up with all of the matching funds.


Only one of the six projects the commission has approved is currently under construction.

The only project under construction, the Harvest Water Program in Sacramento, will recycle wastewater to provide 50,000 acre-feet (16 billion gallons) of water for agricultural purposes.

California’s failure to store and transport water to places where it is needed was highlighted by President Donald Trump in the aftermath of the Palisades and Eaton fires in Los Angeles last month. A 117-gallon reservoir atop the Pacific Palisades, operated by the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, was largely empty at the start of the fire season because it was down for maintenance.

Trump ordered more water to be released from dams for downstream use, but that is only part of the problem. The state has moved at a glacial pace to build new water storage facilities, thanks to environmental concerns and bureaucratic obstacles, and no major dams have been built by the state in over 40 years.
Related:
California: 2025-02-20 LA Mayor: I'm Investigating Why I Was 'Allowed' to Go AWOL
California: 2025-02-20 Noem debuts major anti-illegal immigration ad campaign: ‘We will hunt you down'
California: 2025-02-20 US Test Launches Minuteman III ICBM
Posted by:NoMoreBS

#5  Re: #2

NO FEDERAL MONEY for California Fify
Posted by: alanc   2025-02-21 18:10  

#4  $7.5B doesn’t go as far as you think these days. Maybe another $10B will get things really rolling.
Posted by: Super Hose   2025-02-21 17:36  

#3  Of course nothing got done!

That's what happen when you put democrats in charge.

They'll pay a guy or two to go out and look at the property in question amd come back and file a report that basically says "yep we can dig a hole there and ;ine it with something and it's done!

In the meanwhile the money gets frittered away in various studies, etc (the etc part is mostly people pocketing the money without actually doing anything) resulting in no money left or accounted for.
Posted by: Seeking Cure For Ignorance   2025-02-21 07:33  

#2  "Gooder and harder".

NO FEDERAL MONEY for California "disaster".
Posted by: Crusader   2025-02-21 01:07  

#1  Dont you know the environmental impact studies take decades? This is California you know.
Posted by: 49 Pan   2025-02-21 00:14  

00:00