Comments

You have commented 358 times on Rantburg.

Your Name

Your e-mail (optional)

Website (optional)

	My Original Nic Pic-a-Nic Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Foto

Submit your comments on this article

Home Front: WoT

Tulsi Gabbard Identifies Biggest National Security Threat, and It's Not What We've Been Told

2025-03-03

[PJMedia] In a sane political environment, this would have passed as a decidedly unremarkable, albeit not quite one-hundred-percent accurate, observation. The U.S. Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, recently warned that “radical Islamist terrorism” is the biggest national security threat the nation faces today.

Then the drugs and violence brought in by narco gangs aided and abetted by Communist China must be the second biggest.

Well, of course. The top terror groups worldwide are all Islamic. On Sept. 11, 2001, Islamic jihadis carried out the largest-ever terror attack on American soil. Numerous other Islamic jihad attacks have taken place in the U.S., at Fort Hood, the Boston Marathon, San Bernardino, New Orleans, and numerous other places. The Biden regime caught numerous people on the terror watch list crossing into the U.S. from Mexico and released at least 99 of them into the country. Gabbard was therefore making an entirely reasonable assessment.

Gabbard said: “We look at the past four years of open borders, where we had tens of millions of people coming across our borders, many of whom we don’t know who they are or what their intentions are, very specifically the threat of radical Islamist terrorism here within our country is higher than it’s ever been before, not only because of Biden’s open borders, but because of his and his administration’s fear of being called Islamophobes.”

For Gabbard to speak of “radical Islamist terrorism” was not quite accurate, as there is nothing “radical” about Islamic jihad violence. It is mainstream and deeply rooted in the Qur’an and Sunnah. And “Islamist” is a phony word that corresponds to nothing in Islamic theology. It is just an attempt to distance Islam from the crimes done in its name and in accord with its teachings.

Nevertheless, her statement was a tremendous improvement over the Biden regime. FBI director Christopher Wray testified before members of the Senate Judiciary Committee in March 2021, saying: “The top threat we face from [domestic violent extremists] continues to be those we identify as Racially or Ethnically Motivated Violent Extremists (RMVEs), specifically those who advocate for the superiority of the white race.”

Old Joe Biden then said it during his speech to a Joint Session of Congress in April 2021: “We won’t ignore what our own intelligence agencies have determined – the most lethal terrorist threat to the homeland today is from white supremacist terrorism.”

The following month, a revealing piece in Yahoo News by “journalist” Alexander Nazaryan stated that Biden’s desperately corrupt and partisan Attorney General Merrick Garland “told Congress on Wednesday that violence incited by white supremacists poses ‘the most dangerous threat to our democracy.’ That assertion reflects near-universal consensus among national security experts, including those who worked for the Trump administration.”

In June 2021, Biden doubled down: “As I said in my address to the joint session of Congress: According to the intelligence community, terrorism from white supremacy is the most lethal threat to the homeland today. Not ISIS, not al Qaeda — white supremacists. That’s not me; that’s the intelligence community under both Trump and under my administration.”

Posted by:NoMoreBS

#8 The parallels between the Mannheim and Haifa attacks are striking.

Both terror attacks follow a MO that is typical for Islamic terrorism.

Both perpetrators are not ethno-religious Muslims, thought they might have converted.

Both are reported to be mentally ill.

Both hold German citizenship.

Posted by: Elmerert Hupens2660 2025-03-03 21:32

#7 @6 I have seen a picture purportedly showing the perp, he has a beard but it isn't cut in one of the typical Islamic styles. Also there are reports he attempted to shoot himself, which would be atypical for jihadists.

My point is that the authorities can't be trusted.

If he wasn't motivated by Islam, which is possible, they will report the truth, if he was motivated by Islam they will at least attempt a cover up.

Posted by: Elmerert Hupens2660 2025-03-03 19:13

#6 the Cologne mass rape and abuse of 15/16 for days

We watched that from here, Elmerert Hupens2660 — very upsetting, and such an obvious lie.

Do you think that the 40 year old German citizen really is a mentally ill Moslem colonist who filed (or whose parents filed) the paperwork? I just moved the article to Page 3, but I can move it back if you think it right.

Posted by: trailing wife 2025-03-03 17:16

#5 @4 Was meant for a different post.

Posted by: Elmerert Hupens2660 2025-03-03 17:00

#4 The state interior Minister of Baden-Württemberg says that at this hour there's no indication of an "extremist or religious motive."

The same was said about Southport though and the government did officially deny the Cologne mass rape and abuse of 15/16 for days.

The government may tell the truth here but they're not trustworthy.

Posted by: Elmerert Hupens2660 2025-03-03 16:57

#3

A fair written read on the Steps from:
initial migration,
to setting up communities,
Growth in Numbers,
Political Power,
demands for their OWN LAWS,
Ruling/controls,
Rebellious acts,
to cleaning out non-Islamics.

Posted by: NN2N1 2025-03-03 07:24

#2 “radical Islamist terrorism”
Imported by Obama/et. al.

Posted by: Skidmark 2025-03-03 07:12

#1

Democrats, Liberals, Politically/Socially Mentally Ill and other pervert types.

Would do well to learn how Islamic Regimes historically have address their types and lifestyles.

Posted by: NN2N1 2025-03-03 06:09

00:00