Submit your comments on this article |
Home Front: Politix |
Nasa fires chief scientist, more Trump cuts to come |
2025-03-13 |
[GEO.TV] Nasa announced on Tuesday the dismissal of its chief scientist and others to comply with orders from President Donald Trump![]() , marking the latest in a series of administration actions undermining climate change research. While the move affects only 23 people, a spokeswoman indicated more cuts are coming. The first round notably eliminates the Office of the Chief Scientist, led by Katherine Calvin, a renowned climatologist who contributed to key UN climate reports. She and other US delegates were also barred from attending a major climate science meeting in China last month. "To optimise our workforce, and in compliance with an Executive Order, Nasa is beginning its phased approach to a reduction in force, known as a RIF," agency spokeswoman Cheryl Warner said. "A small number of individuals received notification March 10 they are a part of Nasa's RIF. If they're eligible, those employees may opt to participate in the Voluntary Early Retirement Authority, or VERA, or complete the RIF process." Also eliminated are the Office of Technology, Policy, and Strategy and the Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility Branch of the Office of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion. Nasa has so far avoided the deep cuts affecting other agencies, reportedly due to last minute intervention by Jared Isaacman, Trump's nominee for Nasa chief. Isaacman, an e-payments billionaire and SpaceX customer, is seen as close to Elon Musk — Trump's key advisor and architect of federal cost-cutting efforts. In February, Nasa had been preparing to lay off around a thousand probationary employees. However, a poor excuse is better than no excuse at all... Isaacman reportedly asked for the cuts to be put on hold, according to Ars Technica. Nasa has not explained the reversal. The new layoffs, first reported by Nasa Watch citing an internal memo, could signal a shift away from research and toward exploration. Trump and Musk both support a human mission to Mars. In his State of the Union address last week, Trump declared the US would "plant the American flag on the planet Mars and even far beyond." |
Posted by:Fred |
#4 "Scientists at NASA?"Cue Coneheads laughing. |
Posted by: Rex Mundi 2025-03-13 20:28 |
#3 I'm still trying to figure why it's important or relevant that NASA be Simon pure diverse, equitable, and inclusive. They relied on people who weren't, like Werner von Braun back in the days when they were going to the moon with Fortran, if they were modern and up to date, and punch cards. Is adhering to a party line that important? Or is being able to calculate a trajectory or fuel requirements? Can't a misogynistic racist inspect O rings? |
Posted by: Fred 2025-03-13 19:24 |
#2 Why have the office of the 'Chief Scientist' anyway? This isn't the 1970's where you would want a generalist in house researcher, like a 'Chief Scientist' (being paid a 6 figure salary), with a staff of research assistants (each drawing a 5 figure salary) to physically go out and access scientific articles in various libraries and agencies. |
Posted by: magpie 2025-03-13 12:24 |
#1 Good. She was part of the grift anyway. |
Posted by: DarthVader 2025-03-13 11:42 |