Submit your comments on this article |
Home Front: Politix |
A Seemingly Inebriated Kamala Harris Chimes in on the Wisconsin Election, and She Really Shouldn''t Have — RedState |
2025-04-03 |
[REDSTATE] Things didn't go according to plan for Republicans on Tuesday in Wisconsin. In an all-important Supreme Court race, liberal Susan Crawford prevailed, beating Brad Schimel by a sizable margin despite everyone from President Donald Trump ...Never got invited to a P.Diddy party... to Elon Musk getting involved. The stakes were high, given the far-reaching political implications. Crawford's win gives the Democrats ![]() white people, white supremacy, whiteanything but paint, you're listening to a Democrat. Ask him/her/it to reimagine something for you; they do that a lot, though not well. They can hear a dog whistle a mile or two away. They invented the spoils system and Tammany Hall, and inspired the addition of the word (Thomas) Nastyto the English language. They want to stop continental drift and repeal the law of unintended side effects... a 4-3 majority, and it is expected that they'll force congressional redistricting that will cost Republicans two House seats before the 2026 election even takes place. With the margin already so thin, that could prove decisive in who gets the majority. Naturally, Democrats rushed to gloat, seeing the win as a change in the political winds, and one of them was Kamala Harris What can be, unburdened by what has been . For reasons that weren't immediately clear, she released a TikTok video about the election, and let's just say she really shouldn't have. HARRIS: Hi, Wisconsin, to all of you. I just wanted to pop by to say thank you. You all are just extraordinary. You love our country. You care. You are making such extraordinary sacrifices on behalf of so many people, on behalf of communities, on behalf of people you may never meet. There is an unelected billionaire who should not and will not have a greater voice than the working people of Wisconsin. If it seems like she's toasted there, it's probably because she very well might be. She truly has a way with words, doesn't she? Why voters rejected her at the ballot box in the 2024 election remains one of the greatest political mysteries in history. Alas, we may never know how being "Brat" wasn't enough to pull her over the finish line. There's a bit of irony in Harris chiming in about this specific race, given that she lost Wisconsin. Did the voters there love their country and care when they rejected her? The entire thing is just weird, but I guess Harris feels like she's got to keep her face out there to set up a 2028 run. We all know she's going to, and she continues to lead Democrat primary polls, though it's very early. On that note, it should be pointed out that almost all of her liabilities as a politician are present in that video. Her grating tone, her repetition of words, her reliance on focus-grouped talking points, so on and so forth. The whole "unelected billionaire" gambit Democrats are using is just lame. Every single government bureaucrat is "unelected," and while Musk was involved in the Wisconsin Supreme Court race, so were at least four Democrat billionaires, including George Soros ...either Ernst Stavro Blofeld or Auric Goldfinger come true. Maybe both.... . Related: Kamala Harris 03/31/2025 Canada: Mark Carney Faces Plagiarism Accusations for 1995 Oxford Doctoral Thesis Kamala Harris 03/30/2025 Private groups use facial recognition to unmask anti-Israel campus protesters for deportation Kamala Harris 03/29/2025 Tulsi Gabbard revokes security clearances, access to classified information for Biden, Harris, Clinton, others |
Posted by:Fred |
#1 The Dem ads pounded on Musk giving $3M to the Schimel campaign (Trying to buy the election!, etc.), while Schimel's own ads said nothing about the $25M Crawford's campaign received from George Soros and JB Pritzker. Some smaller conservative PACs did note this in their ads, but those didn't get much airtime. |
Posted by: Mullah Richard 2025-04-03 06:52 |