You have commented 358 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Submit your comments on this article
Home Front: WoT
Trump asks Supreme Court to allow deportations without warning
2025-05-29
[GEO.TV] President Donald Trump
...The cad! Twice caught beating wimmin!...
's administration has asked the US Supreme Court to let it deport migrants colonists to other countries without giving them any warning or chance to explain why they might be in danger.

The request is part of the president's push to speed up deportations and crack down on immigration.

The Justice Department requested that the justices lift Boston-based US District Judge Brian Murphy's nationwide injunction, which requires that migrants colonists be given the opportunity to seek legal relief from deportation before they are sent to so-called ''third countries,'' while litigation in the case continues.

The administration said in its filing that the third-country process is critical to removing migrants colonists who commit crimes, as their countries of origin are often unwilling to take them back.

''As a result, criminal aliens are often allowed to stay in the United States for years on end, victimising law-abiding Americans in the meantime,'' it told the justices.

The filing marked the administration's latest appeal to the country's highest court as it seeks greater freedom to enforce Trump's hardline immigration policies and challenge lower court decisions that have blocked them.

The administration argued that Murphy's injunction is holding up potentially thousands of deportations. It said the ruling ''disrupts sensitive diplomatic, foreign policy and national security efforts.''

In February, the Department of Homeland Security moved to determine whether people granted protection against removal to their home countries could instead be detained and sent to a third country.

Immigrant rights groups filed a class action lawsuit on behalf of migrants colonists who want to stop rapid deportation to third countries without prior notice or a chance to explain the dangers they might face.
Posted by:Fred

#5  Re #4.

Per the 5th amendment: No person shall be ... deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.

SCOTUS has said that it applies to anyone residing in the US.

Of course, due recourse IS denied to the unborn, who, although residing in the USA, are not considered persons under the law. They can be murdered at will. Such is the thinking of progressives.

 
Posted by: Melancholic   2025-05-29 17:02  

#4  You get the rule of law when you accept the rule of law! The courts deny judicial review all the time for plantiff;s who lack "standing". How is it that an illegal entrant into our nation somehow automatically gets due process by the act of criminal entry?
Posted by: NoMoreBS   2025-05-29 14:48  

#3  That is a tall ask. I would say if they are already violent with warrants, yes you can. Arrests can be done without warning for the rest, but they do have to have some due process. Even if it is just a judge looking at their case and going... nope, no reason for you to be here. Bye.
Posted by: DarthVader   2025-05-29 09:53  

#2  Border Patrol Chief: We Can Achieve Arrest Goals if We Focus on Those with Deportation Orders Already in Place

the goal of 3,000 immigration arrests a day reportedly pushed by the Trump administration can be done “pretty rapidly.”
Posted by: Skidmark   2025-05-29 06:13  

#1  

I still feel some procedural delay is needed, to do a background check, say 7 days.

Is the person wanted from felonies?
Does the person have family that should join them?
Was the person illegally employed by a US Business that failed to E-verify?
Does the person owe $$$$ to US Citizens that did not know the person was illegal?
(rent, car, tools, payment etc.)

Like it or not, zero day deportation could cost the private sector harm or monetary grief.

While we are at it.
How about offering repeat felony convicted US Citizens (non-murders) no jail time if they renounce US citizenship, surrender all properties, give up future claims to SSA funds, accept deportation to South America and agree never to return to any USA owned areas?

Posted by: NN2N1   2025-05-29 06:06  

00:00