You have commented 0 times on Rantburg.

We're sorry, but only human beings are allowed to comment on Rantburg. If you're a human being, please take this simple test to prove it. If you're not, get lost.

Fluffy bunnies
Recruiting poster for the WACs
Munchkins
Bandwagon
Hippy bus
Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Photo
Economy
Extend benefits a year and create 300,000 Jobs
2012-12-14
Posted by:Dale

#10  Is everyone in Washington insane?

No. Where do you think the majority of those "jobs" will be created?
Posted by: tu3031   2012-12-14 20:04  

#9  I was curious what might be said here on the berg. I was at a loss for words myself. This current administration will have no qualms supporting this.
Posted by: Dale   2012-12-14 19:57  

#8  Perhaps not everyone, but Mostly.
Especially those with a "D" Gesignation, to rule, not with for justice for all, but for some.
Posted by: Redneck Jim   2012-12-14 17:48  

#7  Is everyone in Washington insane?" Ummm, yes.
Posted by: Redneck Jim   2012-12-14 17:45  

#6  "Could anyone explain to me how this works? Is everyone in Washington insane?" -- JohnQC

No. Yes.
Posted by: Barbara   2012-12-14 17:13  

#5  The "hole digging fallacy" extends or is a useful corollary to the "broken glass fallacy" in economics.
Posted by: JohnQC   2012-12-14 17:04  

#4  Could anyone explain to me how this works? Is everyone in Washington insane?
Posted by: JohnQC   2012-12-14 17:00  

#3  The underlying principle involved here relates to the well known economic fact that if you have a person dig a hole, and have another person fill in the freshly-dug hole, you've created two jobs.

I'm pretty sure Marx talked about exactly this in Das Kapital.
Posted by: Steve White   2012-12-14 16:06  

#2  Wouldn't extending the benefits make the unemployment figures much much worse? Since the vast majority of it's so-called 'improvement' is due to people running out of benefits and no longer being counted.
Posted by: CrazyFool   2012-12-14 15:04  

#1  Do they JMTSU as they go along?

And I have a hard time believing this would 'create' 300,000 jobs. Maybe it would prevent 300,000 people from losing a job.

Assuming it would 'create' 300,000 jobs, that's $100k per job. Not exactly cheap.

Posted by: eltoroverde   2012-12-14 14:37