Submit your comments on this article |
Economy |
Extend benefits a year and create 300,000 Jobs |
2012-12-14 |
Posted by:Dale |
#10 Is everyone in Washington insane? No. Where do you think the majority of those "jobs" will be created? |
Posted by: tu3031 2012-12-14 20:04 |
#9 I was curious what might be said here on the berg. I was at a loss for words myself. This current administration will have no qualms supporting this. |
Posted by: Dale 2012-12-14 19:57 |
#8 Perhaps not everyone, but Mostly. Especially those with a "D" Gesignation, to rule, not with for justice for all, but for some. |
Posted by: Redneck Jim 2012-12-14 17:48 |
#7 Is everyone in Washington insane?" Ummm, yes. |
Posted by: Redneck Jim 2012-12-14 17:45 |
#6 "Could anyone explain to me how this works? Is everyone in Washington insane?" -- JohnQC No. Yes. |
Posted by: Barbara 2012-12-14 17:13 |
#5 The "hole digging fallacy" extends or is a useful corollary to the "broken glass fallacy" in economics. |
Posted by: JohnQC 2012-12-14 17:04 |
#4 Could anyone explain to me how this works? Is everyone in Washington insane? |
Posted by: JohnQC 2012-12-14 17:00 |
#3 The underlying principle involved here relates to the well known economic fact that if you have a person dig a hole, and have another person fill in the freshly-dug hole, you've created two jobs. I'm pretty sure Marx talked about exactly this in Das Kapital. |
Posted by: Steve White 2012-12-14 16:06 |
#2 Wouldn't extending the benefits make the unemployment figures much much worse? Since the vast majority of it's so-called 'improvement' is due to people running out of benefits and no longer being counted. |
Posted by: CrazyFool 2012-12-14 15:04 |
#1 Do they JMTSU as they go along? And I have a hard time believing this would 'create' 300,000 jobs. Maybe it would prevent 300,000 people from losing a job. Assuming it would 'create' 300,000 jobs, that's $100k per job. Not exactly cheap. |
Posted by: eltoroverde 2012-12-14 14:37 |