[INTERNEWSCAST] President Barack Obama’s promise to build and revitalize blighted neighborhoods was a centerpiece of his first term in the White House.
But now, nearly nine years after departing from the Oval Office, he may be undermining a significant part of the city he once called home, the Daily Mail can disclose.
His $850 million presidential center in Chicago, set to open in April, has faced criticism from residents, community leaders, and even former supporters who now express concerns that the vast 19.3-acre development in Jackson Park is leading to neighborhood gentrification, raising rent, and displacing families.
Photo at the link of the barren landscape with a bit of hardscaping and the unfinished library building to one side where previously a city park flourished.
Alderwoman Jeanette Taylor, who represents a large portion of the territory where the center is being constructed, informed the Daily Mail that she admires Obama and supports the project but has challenged certain elements to safeguard her constituents. Her endeavors have achieved mixed outcomes.
‘We’re going to see rents go higher and we’re going to see families displaced,’ she told the Daily Mail.
‘Every time large development comes to communities, they displace the very people they say they want to improve it for,’ the Democrat added.
‘This was no different, and we’re witnessing the reality of the situation. The city of Chicago should have established a Community Benefits Agreement before construction began, but they did not.’
A CBA is a legally binding agreement that specifies what a developer will offer for a project, including affordable housing, local employment, and environmental safeguards.
‘We’re going to see small landlords having to raise the rent,’ warned Taylor. ‘Their property taxes are going up and we’re going to see development that is not inclusive to our community.’
Allison Davis of Aquinnah Investment Trust, who has close ties with Obama, plans to build a 26-story, 250-room luxury hotel just down the street from the center.
And Taylor said ‘$300,000 and $400,000 homes that nobody can afford’ are already popping up around the area on Chicago’s poverty-stricken South Side.
Taylor is not the only critic.
‘It looks like this big piece of rock that just landed here out of nowhere in what used to be a really nice landscape of trees and flowers,’ Ken Woodard, 39, an attorney and father of six who grew up in the area told Daily Mail. ‘It’s a monstrosity.
‘It’s over budget, it’s taking way too long to finish and it’s going to drive up prices and bring headaches and problems for everyone who lives here.
‘It feels like a washing away of the neighborhood and culture that used to be here.’
Kyana Butler, 30, who lives in the area, is a member of the Southside Together group, one of at least three major activist groups that has lobbied for better protections for the area from the Obama Foundation.
‘Rents are going up fast. A two-bedroom apartment that used to rent for $800 a month has already jumped to $1,800.
‘Property taxes are going up so much that the owner of my building is saying she might just walk away.
‘I don’t blame President Obama for all of this, but the people on his team may not have the best intentions for people in this area.’
[JustTheNews] U.S. Tax Court judge had tentatively set a Dec. 1 trial, and the petitioners are facing opposition from Trump's IRS, largely on the basis of procedural and administrative law. Future filings and a possible trial may disclose more facts about the Clinton Foundation that have not yet been tested as true or false.
So not protecting the Clintons, but putting together a better case against them. And possibly a better prosecution team?
A U.S. Tax Court judge has tentatively scheduled a Dec. 1 trial allowing two whistleblowers to show they were wrongly denied an award for identifying alleged tax irregularities inside Bill and Hillary Clinton’s foundation, but the case is meeting resistance from an unexpected source: the Trump administration.
The Internal Revenue Service under Trump filed a motion last week in the case brought by retired federal agent John Moynihan and private fraud expert Larry Doyle seeking to dismiss the case. Judge Alina I. Marshall set a deadline of September 15 for the petitioners to respond to that motion. The IRS also filed leave for an extension of time to file the Administrative Record with the court.
IRS SAYS PLAINTIFFS LACK STANDING TO SUE
The agency argued that, as a matter of administrative and procedural law, the judge should not let the case proceed to trial because after an initial review, the IRS declined to look into the whistleblower complaint and, therefore, the plaintiffs don’t have standing to sue.
“In this case, the Whistleblower Office denied petitioners’ claims because the petitioners’ claims were never considered in an IRS action. Here, the Whistleblower Office forwarded petitioners’ claims to a classifier,” the IRS motion to dismiss argued last week “Following the classifiers’ preliminary review, the Classifier declined to forward petitioners’ claims to exam and recommended that it be forwarded to the CI [criminal investigation] division.
“The IRS did not proceed with any potential action when it investigated petitioners’ claims,” the IRS added.
OBAMA'S DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL: "SHUT IT DOWN"
The effort by the IRS to thwart the whistleblower case from going to trial was filed the same week Just the News reported that a bombshell memo recently uncovered by FBI Director Kash Patel shows the Obama Justice Department and former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe roadblocked three separate probes into possible pay-to-play corruption allegations against the Clinton Foundation.
“Shut it down,” Obama Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates was quoted as saying in March 2016 in the memos.
You can read that memo here:
Spokespersons for the IRS, the Treasury Department and the White House did not immediately return requests for comment on Sunday.
The Clinton Foundation has long denied it did anything wrong and said any suggestion of wrongdoing was politically motivated.
Doyle told Just the News the latest twist is just another example of the resistance the government has displayed to investigating the Clinton Foundation over many years.
“Not surprising that the IRS would seek to dismiss our case in this fashion simply because that is the same tactic the IRS deployed in our initial case ongoing now almost 6 years in US Tax Court and growing more serious everyday," he said.
“The simple fact is the more the American public learns about the Clinton Foundation as it has in recent days, the more it is entitled to know all the truth and facts involved," he added.
The IRS court filing gives the public some of the most detailed information yet about what Moynihan and Doyle alleged, showing the whistleblowers raised concerns similar to what the FBI was investigating.
ACTING AS AN UNREGISTERED FOREIGN AGENT, FUNDING OVERSEAS ABORTION
One of those concerns was that the Clinton Foundation and its sister organizations were operating as an agent for foreigners who paid it money and that it failed to register under the Foreign Agent Registration Act (FARA).
“The company has not registered under FARA and receives funds from and works on behalf of foreign governments,” one of the summary documents from the IRS's initial review stated. The name of the company was redacted but sources said it referred to an affiliate of the Clinton Foundation
Another allegation the IRS memos mentioned for investigation was that the Clinton Foundation through one of its allies contributed to activities not allowed by a tax-exempt status, including abortions overseas. The ability of U.S. charities to fund abortions overseas is limited by a patchwork of U.S. laws and policies, particularly the Helms Amendment and the Mexico City Policy.
“Documents received from India indicate the company was approved for information purposes related to family planning,” an IRS memo summarizing the allegations said. “The company operates outside of those purposes stated to the I.R.S. in the form of commercial for-profit condom and associated products retailers, abortion procedures for profit and sundry other commercial enterprises.”
NON-PROFIT IN THE U.S., BUT FOR-PROFIT OVERSEAS?
A third allegation was that one of the Foundation's allies declared it was a for-profit entity overseas in certain countries while seeking 501c3 non-profit status in America.
One section of the whistleblowers' complaint was marked "Tax Fraud." The complaint went on to say "The company has been recognized Internationally by foreign governments as a for-profit enterprise and as such is reporting revenues to those countries either in the form of profits or losses [...] Upon review, the foreign operations have balance sheet loans payables to the 501c3 headquartered in the U.S.A. yet 990 reviews here show no loan receivables."
“This is likely due to the nature of the 501c3 status of the U.S.A. entity being a corporation acting as a public charity and not a private foundation making grants. In either situation, 501c3 operations cannot have quid pro quo components and the idea of for-profit loans would violate such tenets,” it added.
The IRS motion to dismiss adds new intrigue to a case that first surfaced nearly eight years ago when Doyle and Moynihan, two respected forensic financial investigators, revealed the existence of their 2017 IRS whistleblower complaint against the foundation during a 2018 congressional hearing.
Moynihan and Doyle testified to a House committee in December of that year that they believed the foundation wrongly operated as a foreign lobbyist by accepting overseas donations, with the purpose of influencing U.S. policy.
The foundation "began acting as an agent of foreign governments early in its life and throughout its existence," Moynihan testified at the time. "As such, the foundation should've registered under FARA (Foreign Agents Registration Act). Ultimately, the foundation and its auditors conceded in formal submissions that it did operate as a (foreign) agent, therefore the foundation is not entitled to its 501c3 tax-exempt privileges as outlined in IRS 170 (c)2."
The foundation has acknowledged that past internal audits revealed compliance problems with some of its practices but insisted those have been fixed and that it always complied with the law, strongly disputing the whistleblowers' allegations.
In all, Moynihan and Doyle filed two complaints against the Clinton Foundation, the latter which included some of its allies. It is that second case that is slated for trial in December.
In the first case back in October 2020, Tax Court Judge David Gustafson first allowed the whistleblowers' case to proceed, rejecting an IRS motion for summary judgment. He cited nonpublic evidence that the FBI and IRS may have worked jointly on a criminal investigation focused on the Clinton Foundation. Months later, the judge suggested the IRS Whistleblower Office may have evidence it had not disclosed to the court in the case.
DURHAM REPORT SHOWS AT LEAST FOUR ONGOING INVESTIGATIONS, ALL SHUT DOWN
Some of that evidence burst into public in 2023 when former Special Counsel John Durham divulged in his 306-page final report that the FBI had at least four ongoing investigations during the 2016 election into Bill and Hillary Clinton’s business and purported philanthropic activities. The known probes involved the bureau's Washington, New York and Little Rock, Ark., field offices.
Three of those probes were started during the 2016 election campaign, and were focused on allegations that the Clinton Foundation was at the center of "criminal activity" that included "fraud and corruption allegations."
One of the most serious allegations was that "large monetary contributions were made to a non-profit, under both direct and indirect control of the federal public official, in exchange for favorable government action and/or influence," Durham wrote.
"Beginning in late 2014, before Clinton formally declared her presidential candidacy, the FBI learned from a well-placed [source] that a foreign government was planning to send an individual to contribute to Clinton’s anticipated presidential campaign, as a way to gain influence with her should she win the presidency," he also said.
All four of the probes were shut down as the 2016 presidential election was drawing to a close, and senior FBI and Justice Department officials were involved in the effort to slow or stop the probes, Durham wrote, based on evidence he collected from cooperating FBI agents.
"Both senior FBI and department officials placed restrictions on how those matters were to be handled such that essentially no investigative activities occurred for months," he noted.
You can read the Durham report here.
Gustafson’s order gave Moynihan and Doyle a fresh opening to incorporate Durham’s bombshell allegations in their court filings.
Posted by: Skidmark ||
08/20/2025 00:00 ||
Comments ||
Link ||
E-Mail||
[19 views]
Top|| File under: Tin Hat Dictators, Presidents for Life,
[10News] The Associated Press reported that some of the individuals who had their security clearance revoked worked on the assessment that Russia interfered in the 2016 presidential election.
The Trump administration said it is revoking the security clearances of 37 national security officials who have been accused of things like "politicization or weaponization of intelligence to advance personal or partisan gain."
"Being entrusted with a security clearance is a privilege, not a right. Those in the Intelligence Community who betray their oath to the Constitution and put their own interests ahead of the interests of the American people have broken the sacred trust they promised to uphold," Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard said on X. "In doing so, they undermine our national security, the safety and security of the American people and the foundational principles of our democratic republic."
Gabbard's announcement said her office determined that the individuals in question had failed "to safeguard classified information in accordance with applicable laws, regulations and agency policies, "failed to adhere to professional analytics tradecraft standards," and/or "other conduct detrimental to the trust and confidence required for continued access to national security information."
The Associated Press reported that some of the individuals listed as having their security clearance revoked had worked on the intelligence community's assessment that Russia interfered in the 2016 presidential election. The outlet cited unnamed sources.
Signing on to that kind of lie is proof they ought never have been given security clearance at any level.
The 37 individuals who had any type of employment with the government were terminated immediately and had to turn over their credentials, according to a statement from. Gabbard's office.
It’s the latest action of retribution by the Trump administration against national security officials he perceives as having been against him.
The reason doesn’t matter if they ought not to have had it, so long as the error is fixed. Burt retribution is hot, while this is ice cold.
It comes as his government has launched a sweeping effort to cast doubt on the legitimacy of intelligence community findings that Russia interfered on his behalf in the 2016 election.
No casting necessary. They know they lied, we know they lied. Lying of that sort is not permitted.
Courtesy of Skidmark, Fox News names some names:
A DNI memo sent out on Monday included the names of officials who worked at the CIA, NSA, State Department and National Security Council, including former Obama DNI James Clapper, who Gabbard claimed told officials to "compromise" normal procedures to rush a 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment related to Russia's influence in the 2016 election.
Notable officials on the list include Brett M. Holmgren, former assistant secretary of state for intelligence and research; Richard H. Ledgett, former NSA deputy director; Stephanie O’Sullivan, former principal deputy director of National Intelligence; and Luke R. Hartig, former senior director for counterterrorism at the National Security Council.
Also included was Yael Eisenstat, a former CIA officer and White House advisor known for her involvement in the Facebook election integrity operation.
The memo noted the revocation was effective immediately, and the officials' access to classified systems, facilities, materials and information would be terminated.
Posted by: Frank G ||
08/20/2025 00:00 ||
Comments ||
Link ||
E-Mail||
[26 views]
Top|| File under: Tin Hat Dictators, Presidents for Life, & Kleptocrats
#1
The 37 individuals who had any type of employment with the government were terminated immediately and had to turn over their credentials, according to a statement from. Gabbard's office.
Access to classified documents and information is a granted privilege, not a right. If you no longer need 'Access' to classified material, you no longer need the tickets.
[ConservativeTreehouse] Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey has announced his resignation from the state AG position to take a role at the top of the FBI silo. Pam Bondi has appointed Andrew Bailey as Co-Deputy FBI Director to serve alongside Dan Bongino.
This outcome and appointment make a lot of sense. Missouri AG Andrew Bailey helped expose the DHS manipulation of social media and has pushed the envelope against the Deep State/Lawfare attacks against Donald Trump.
Bailey has used the power of his office for good purposes and provided cautious optimism he could do the same at a federal level in the position.
Two weaknesses with the appointment of Kash Patel and Dan Bongino were that neither of them had large institutional leadership experience, and neither had organized long investigative processes within the legal system. The concerns therein were never about intent, but rather, their ability.
Andrew Bailey provides a boost in experience that both the Director and Deputy are lacking. This is not a slight against Kash Patel and Dan Bongino, the appointment of a subject matter expert is strategically necessary.
Deputy U.S Attorney General Todd Blanche, United States Solicitor General D. John Sauer, and Dept of Justice Investigative Lead, Attorney Ed Martin, are very serious people within Main Justice. Deputy FBI Director Andrew Bailey will be an excellent addition overall.
DAG Blanche coordinates and prioritizes the day-to-day USAO office activity around the country. Blanche is the general in charge of eliminating Lawfare efforts. Solicitor General Sauer faces the Supreme Court. Sauer is the general in charge of framing the arguments from Blanche that reach the court. Meanwhile, DC USAO Martin, now with position changed to Presidential Appointment Martin in charge of investigating weaponized justice efforts, is the lead investigator on all enmeshed corruption within Washington DC.
Blanche, Sauer and Martin are serious and purposefully driven men with very specific skillsets. So too is Andrew Bailey.
The reality of the DC silo system is not easily understood, and that is entirely by design. High profiles may generate headlines, but do not generate adequate results as increasingly evidenced by AG Bondi, Director Patel and Deputy Bongino, all essentially, TV performers.
To speak bluntly, Bondi, Patel and Bongino are in over their heads. However, Pam Bondi has Todd Blanche to run cover for her inadequacies. Kash Patel did not have the same; he does now.
♦ Because there is so much confusion, a little background context is needed. You see, you might remember former Special Prosecutor John Durham who was appointed by former Attorney General Bill Barr. During his review of all ‘Russiagate’ matters, John Durham was never permitted to investigate anyone inside govt.
John Durham was given a very specific task and very specific guardrails he was not allowed to cross or touch. The guardrails are what created the outcome. The guardrails were put into place by AG Bill when he officially appointed him in October 19, 2020; five months after the initial request to begin review.
Politicians, political staff, members of the Obama administration, political appointees and any federal govt employee within any agency were off limits to Durham. During a conversation on August 18, 2020, Durham’s lead investigator Bill Aldenberg first admitted the limitations. No-one inside government could be investigated.
Given the passage of time, this background is generally a moot point; I am only sharing it again for the sake of clarity. The key point is that govt participants were never investigated by John Durham, and a full accounting of the corrupt players was never made public.
♦ Now, back to the matter at hand.
WASHINGTON DC – […] Ed Martin has spent months leveraging his perch as top federal DC prosecutor and quietly operating as a tip of the spear in the administration’s war against Russiagate villains, Capitol riot prosecutions and lawfare, The Post has learned.
Now that his responsibilities have been sharpened, Martin anticipates there “may be no limit to the targets” the Justice Department’s Weaponization Working Group will pursue under his watch, since there “was no limit to the weaponization.”
“It’s a nationwide and frankly, international docket where the government was used against the citizens, where the government was weaponized,” Martin told The Post about his plans for the weaponization working group. “Sometimes there’ll be crimes involved, in which case we’ll prosecute. Sometimes there’ll be just the need to make clear this is not how it’s supposed to go.”
Shortly after Trump tapped him as interim US attorney for the District of Columbia, a post that expires on May 20, Martin quickly demoted over half a dozen prosecutors involved with Capitol riot cases and fired off investigatory letters to key Russiagate actors.
This includes Andrew Weissman, the Mueller probe “pitbull;” Mary McCord, who oversaw DOJ’s sprawling probe into possible Trump-Russia ties; Aaron Zelinsky, another Mueller probe prosecutor; and Charles McGonigal, a former FBI special agent in charge who also worked on the Russia probe of the Trump campaign.
[…] The DOJ’s Weaponization Working Group was established in February by Attorney General Pam Bondi in response to an executive order from Trump to root out remnants of lawfare and hold key perpetrators accountable.
Martin was an early member of the group, and now, as its leader, he will report to Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche. He has also been tapped to serve as pardon attorney.
“The truth is important, and we need it,” Martin reflected about his new role. “We need to move forward. But then, after the truth is known, we need to hold those accountable that did the wrongdoing, and we need to also help those who are victims. We have both of those obligations.” (link)
We deserve an honest reckoning for what took place. Andrew Bailey partnered with Ed Martin gets us one step closer.
[10News] Gen. David Allvin will continue serving as the service’s chief of staff until a replacement is confirmed by the Senate, the Air Force announced Monday.
The Air Force's top uniformed officer is set to retire early in the most recent shake-up of military leadership during President Donald Trump’s second term.
Gen. David Allvin will continue serving as the service’s chief of staff until a replacement is confirmed by the Senate, the Air Force announced Monday. He expects to retire around Nov. 1, two years into his four-year term, it said in a statement.
Allvin joins other top military officials who have stepped down or been fired by Trump's Republican administration during a broader leadership upheaval, including Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's plans to slash the number of senior military positions in what he calls an efficiency effort and a purge of top officers who were believed to endorse diversity, equity and inclusion programs.
For example, Trump fired Air Force Gen. CQ Brown Jr. as chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff in February. Brown was the second Black general to serve as chairman, and Air Force Gen. Dan Caine later took over the role.
Allvin, a command pilot with more than 4,600 flying hours, was appointed Air Force chief of staff by President Joe Biden, a Democrat, serving since November 2023. Before that, he was vice chief of staff during Trump’s first term.
Posted by: Frank G ||
08/20/2025 00:09 ||
Comments ||
Link ||
E-Mail||
[23 views]
Top|| File under:
[JustTheNews] Former FBI agent and friend of Peter Strzok who recently resigned from the bureau after he says his relationship with the disgraced ex-FBI official was scrutinized by Dan Bongino is now defending Crossfire Hurricane, suggesting Donald Trump was in contact with Russian intelligence, comparing the FBI under Kash Patel to the KGB and Chinese spy services, throwing around Nazi comparisons, and more.
Michael Feinberg, who was recently the assistant special agent in charge at the FBI’s Norfolk field office in Virginia, left the FBI at the end of May after he claims his direct superior told him that FBI deputy director Dan Bongino was scrutinizing his longtime friendship with Strzok, the disgraced FBI special agent who played a key role in the Trump-Russia investigation and was fired following the emergence of biased anti-Trump texts he had exchanged with FBI lawyer Lisa Page, with whom he was having an affair.
Rather than take a polygraph test about his relationship with Strzok, Feinberg says he quit the FBI instead of risking the possible demotion he says he was facing in place of the big promotion to FBI headquarters which he had been expecting.
The FBI’s website says that “although we have used polygraphs to screen new employees for many years, since the 2001 Robert Hanssen spy case, we have also been requiring regular polygraph examinations of FBI employees with access to sensitive compartmented information.”
ANTI-TRUMP OPERATIVES' NEW HERO
Since leaving the bureau, Feinberg has been hailed this summer by some as a possible “Resistance 2.0”-style hero by multiple anti-Trump foes. He has appeared on CNN and MSNBC, talked with Daily Show host and Trump critic Jon Stewart, got a job at the Brookings Institute-affiliated anti-Trump outlet Lawfare, and more, all while lashing out at the FBI under FBI Director Kash Patel.
Feinberg has hinted at a nefarious connection between Trump and Russia, has compared the current bureau to Communist-style spy agencies, and has suggested that the Trump administration had commonalities with the Nazi regime, all while promoting the views of his friend Peter Strzok and seeking to downplay the FBI’s wrongdoing during its politically-motivated Crossfire Hurricane inquiry into now debunked claims of Trump-Russia collusion.
"RESISTANCE 2.0" EMBRACES FEINBERG
Feinberg has been widely embraced by an array of anti-Trump figures who played a role in the “Resistance” against Trump during the president’s first term.
Benjamin Wittes — described by Politico in 2017 as “The Bard of the Deep State” — is a longtime Trump critic, a self-described friend of Comey and Strzok, and the editor-in-chief of Lawfare, where Feinberg wrote his first article describing his resignation from the FBI. Feinberg will reportedly soon be working for Lawfare.
New York Times reporter Michael Schmidt wrote multiple stories in May 2017 about Comey’s interactions with Trump — including the contents of the so-called Comey Memos, which described Wittes as “a friend of Mr. Comey’s” with Wittes writing that he gave a long interview to Schmidt “about my conversations with FBI Director James Comey over the last few months, and particularly about one such conversation that took place on March 27 over lunch in Comey’s FBI office.”
During Trump’s first term, Wittes would celebrate Russiagate stories by posting on social media videos of a “Baby Cannon” firing. Wittes and Feinberg also say they are friends, and Wittes and Feinberg announced that Feinberg would be working at Lawfare soon after his resignation in late May of this year.
Feinberg is now listed as a Lawfare contributor and has appeared on at least one more Lawfare podcast episodes with Wittes on the “Trials of the Trump Administration”, including one in early August on “the politicization of the Justice Department” and “the Justice Department’s misconduct complaint against Judge Boasberg.”
WELCOME TO THE "OTHER SIDE“
"Boom, you're a great American. Welcome to the other side. There's lots of public service to do on this side,” Wittes said. “For those who do not know this already, Mike will be joining Lawfare in September as our next public service fellow. You will be hearing from him a lot. He's got a lot to say about the bureau, about the rule of law, about the Chinese Communist Party and its efforts against the United States, and again, about a whole lot of other stuff too. Mike, we'll be hearing a lot more from you. Welcome to the Lawfare clubhouse.”
Feinberg also announced on LinkedIn in July that he was joining Justice Connection, a group which describes itself as “a network of DOJ alumni working to protect our former colleagues who are under attack.” Feinberg wrote that “the organization was a great help to me when I left the FBI earlier than I ever expected I would, and I’m looking forward to being able to assist those in a similar position.”
Justice Connection tweeted in July that “we’re grateful Mike Feinberg has joined Justice Connection, part of what he calls ‘the exile community,’ to defend FBI agents from Kash Patel's dangerous purge of the bureau's apolitical workforce.”
The Steady State — a group of former national security officials who include a number of Hunter Biden laptop letter signers — also embraced Feinberg, writing a letter which decried what they wrongly described as his removal and encouraging their followers to embrace Feinberg. The group, which says it has been resisting Trump since 2016, listed Feinberg as among those named in “a starter pack of individuals with expertise in national security who support the rule-of-law, civil liberties, and constitutional democracy.”
Listed members of the Steady State include Hunter Biden laptop letter signers Larry Pfeiffer and John Sipher, Biden State Department spokesman Ned Price, Christopher Steele’s friend and former State Department official Jonathan Winer and so-called "anti-disinformation" business Newsguard's General (Ret.) Michael Hayden.
Miles Taylor — the former DHS official from the first Trump administration who went by “Anonymous” when writing the 2018 New York Times piece which declared that “I Am Part of the Resistance Inside the Trump Administration” — has also repeatedly praised Feinberg.
[JustTheNews] Newsom went as far as to compare Trump’s decision to actions made by Russian President Vladimir Putin and North Korea ruler Kim Jon Un, in a post on X Sunday.
A multi-volume chronology and reference guide set detailing three years of the Mexican Drug War between 2010 and 2012.
Rantburg.com and borderlandbeat.com correspondent and author Chris Covert presents his first non-fiction work detailing
the drug and gang related violence in Mexico.
Chris gives us Mexican press dispatches of drug and gang war violence
over three years, presented in a multi volume set intended to chronicle the death, violence and mayhem which has
dominated Mexico for six years.
Rantburg was assembled from recycled algorithms in the United States of America. No
trees were destroyed in the production of this weblog. We did hurt some, though. Sorry.
[INTERNEWSCAST] President Barack Obama’s promise to build and revitalize blighted neighborhoods was a centerpiece of his first term in the White House.
[JustTheNews] U.S. Tax Court judge had tentatively set a Dec. 1 trial, and the petitioners are facing opposition from Trump's IRS, largely on the basis of procedural and administrative law. Future filings and a possible trial may disclose more facts about the Clinton Foundation that have not yet been tested as true or false.
ACTING AS AN UNREGISTERED FOREIGN AGENT, FUNDING OVERSEAS ABORTION
[ConservativeTreehouse] Missouri Attorney General 
