Hi there, !
Today Thu 03/01/2007 Wed 02/28/2007 Tue 02/27/2007 Mon 02/26/2007 Sun 02/25/2007 Sat 02/24/2007 Fri 02/23/2007 Archives
Rantburg
531698 articles and 1855974 comments are archived on Rantburg.

Today: 102 articles and 446 comments as of 13:46.
Post a news link    Post your own article   
Area: WoT Operations    Non-WoT    Opinion    Local News       
3 French nationals murdered in Soddy ministry
Today's Headlines
Headline Comments [Views]
Page 2: WoT Background
9 00:00 Gladys [1] 
1 00:00 C-Low [1] 
6 00:00 DMFD [] 
3 00:00 tu3031 [] 
3 00:00 tu3031 [] 
3 00:00 Shipman [] 
6 00:00 JosephMendiola [] 
3 00:00 Glenmore [] 
0 [] 
1 00:00 PlanetDan [] 
16 00:00 DMFD [] 
3 00:00 Anonymoose [] 
5 00:00 Shipman [] 
11 00:00 49 Pan [] 
1 00:00 49 Pan [1] 
2 00:00 GK [] 
2 00:00 Anguper Hupomosing9418 [] 
2 00:00 tu3031 [1] 
14 00:00 ryuge [] 
2 00:00 Anguper Hupomosing9418 [] 
2 00:00 Sneaze [] 
15 00:00 USN, ret. [1] 
3 00:00 Old Patriot [] 
19 00:00 Jan [] 
5 00:00 Nimble Spemble [] 
5 00:00 Verlaine [] 
2 00:00 Anguper Hupomosing9418 [] 
0 [] 
2 00:00 JosephMendiola [] 
7 00:00 JosephMendiola [] 
0 [] 
2 00:00 USN, Ret. [] 
4 00:00 JosephMendiola [] 
0 [] 
0 [] 
4 00:00 Anguper Hupomosing9418 [] 
10 00:00 Mahmoud DinnerJacket [1] 
2 00:00 JohnQC [] 
Page 1: WoT Operations
7 00:00 trailing wife []
1 00:00 doc []
11 00:00 Zenster [1]
7 00:00 RD []
9 00:00 Shipman []
5 00:00 Virgin Nazi []
1 00:00 anonymous5089 []
10 00:00 mac []
1 00:00 gromgoru [1]
4 00:00 Ebbang Uluque6305 []
0 []
5 00:00 USN, ret. []
0 []
0 []
3 00:00 Redneck Jim []
4 00:00 Excalibur []
0 []
12 00:00 USN, ret. []
3 00:00 tu3031 [1]
4 00:00 BA [1]
0 [1]
1 00:00 Redneck Jim [1]
1 00:00 Jesing Ebbease3087 []
Page 3: Non-WoT
0 []
14 00:00 DMFD []
7 00:00 Ricky bin Ricardo (Abu Babaloo) [2]
4 00:00 whatadeal []
8 00:00 C-Low []
0 []
4 00:00 Richard Aubrey []
4 00:00 DMFD []
3 00:00 JosephMendiola []
1 00:00 mac []
7 00:00 Shipman [1]
6 00:00 Frank G []
6 00:00 JDB []
33 00:00 DMFD []
6 00:00 mac []
0 []
8 00:00 USN, Ret. []
0 []
2 00:00 RD []
0 []
1 00:00 Redneck Jim []
1 00:00 Sneaze []
Page 4: Opinion
2 00:00 CrazyFool []
1 00:00 gromgoru []
0 []
5 00:00 Rob Crawford []
0 []
0 []
0 []
0 []
1 00:00 JosephMendiola []
0 []
4 00:00 RD []
Page 5: Russia-Former Soviet Union
4 00:00 Anonymoose []
1 00:00 Dar []
35 00:00 Redneck Jim []
3 00:00 PlanetDan []
0 []
0 []
4 00:00 Redneck Jim []
7 00:00 Redneck Jim []
-Lurid Crime Tales-
Iranian MPs enraged over test accused of mocking Muhammad


[Hat tip to Jihad Watch]

Iranian MPs have demanded an apology from President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad after teachers were given government-sponsored tests deemed "insulting" to the prophet Muhammad. The exam - sat by teachers seeking promotion - provoked outrage by posing questions which appeared to degrade Islam's holiest figure by alluding to personal habits and proclivities. Most of the 40 multiple-choice questions have been judged so mocking that Iran's state-controlled media has refrained from publishing them.

One less offensive question, reproduced by local newspapers and websites, lists four choices when asking how Muhammad compared himself with the prophet Joseph. They are: "A) I am more beautiful than Joseph; B) Joseph is more beautiful than me; C) I am cuter than Joseph; D) Joseph is more beautiful than me but I am cuter than him." Others refer to his hair and beard colour.

The national teachers' representative body protested after the test was given to diploma and higher-diploma level teachers in Tehran province. The local education authority admitted the questions were "in bad taste" and withdrew them. An alternative exam is being drawn up for teachers who failed, although the results of those with pass marks have been declared valid.

Some MPs branded the incident a deliberate plot to undermine Iran's Islamic system and likened it to last year's row over Danish cartoons satirising Muhammad, which provoked outrage throughout the Muslim world after they were published in several European newspapers.

"What is the difference between these questions and the caricatures drawn in Denmark against the prophet?" said Emad Afrough, the fundamentalist head of the cultural committee in Iran's parliament. The latest row has spurred parliamentarians to begin preparations for impeaching the education minister, Mahmoud Farshidi, who has apologised for the tests. However, MPs have dismissed his mea culpa as insufficient and have called on Mr Ahmadinejad to apologise on the government's behalf.

The president has declined to comment directly but said in a speech this week in the northern province of Gilan: "The unity, authority and dignity of the Iranian nation stems from sticking to the dignified presence of the dear prophet of Islam, Muhammad." Teachers were given 30 hours off classroom duties to study a biography of the prophet by the late Ayatollah Muhammad Tabatabai, a Shia philosopher whose teachings inspired many senior figures in Iran's Islamic revolutionary movement. Its strong focus on personal characteristics - including hygiene, physical appearance and eating habits - was the subject of staffroom gossip and jokes. "Some teachers were even exchanging notes on the book's content in text messages," one teacher told the newspaper Etemade Melli.

Personal questions

The test posed questions on the minutiae of the prophet Muhammad's life, including:

God's prophet never ate food with

a) Two fingers

b) Three fingers

c) Four fingers

d) Five fingers

God's prophet's hair was

a) Black

b) White

c) With the exceptions of a few hairs, predominantly black

d) Whitened at the end of his life

What colour was the prophet's beard?

a) Totally white, even upon his chin

b) Totally black, even over his chin

c) White over the chin and the rest salt and pepper

d) Salt and pepper over the chin and the rest white

On which side did God's prophet sleep?

a) On his back

b) On his chest

b) To the right

d) To the left

My Frink-O-Matic Irony Meter™ is smoking like a two-bit cigar.

Prepare for the joy of watching Islam turn upon itself. Evidently the Chief Thug's underthugs have decided that management just isn't up to snuff. As if the Sunni-Shia festivities weren't enough, now we are treated to the spectacle of testivities.

"Most of the 40 multiple-choice questions have been judged so mocking that Iran's state-controlled media has refrained from publishing them."

This is almost like Monty Python's "Funniest Joke in the World" skit. I can only imagine that those judges who try this case will only be able to examine a single word or two from any given question for fear that, they too, might be prone to burst out laughing, detect and experience the profoundly dire humiliation of witnessing Mohammed (may bees pee upon him) being mocked. [gasp]

I've said it before and I'll say it again:

Skinless people living in a sandpaper world.

George Orwell would be so proud to see the world's most intolerant religion ratcheting up its own intolerance like this. Is it too soon to hope that this is only one of many such incidents whereby Islam's own bloated sense of gravitas forces itself into a grotesque death-spiral of auto-da-fé and self-incrimination?

Or is this just another sort of tomato-pricing conspiracy by Iran's mullahs to erode Ahmadinejad's popularity with the masses? I hope you don't mind if I laugh and point.

Posted by: Zenster || 02/26/2007 18:30 || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  1) Mohammed, Jesus and Abraham walk into a bar. Jesus orders a tequila sunrise, Abraham orders a gin and tonic. What does Mohammed do?

a) Order a pina colada.
b) Hit on the waitress.
c) Play darts and cheat.
d) Behead everyone and burn down the bar for serving alcohol.

2) Mohammed enters the women's restroom by mistake, and sees another man's wife without her veil. What does he do?

a) Kill her for tempting him.
b) Kill all the women in the restroom.
c) Kill all the women in the building.
d) Go to the men's room and masturbate furiously.
e) All of the above, but not in that order.
Posted by: Anonymoose || 02/26/2007 19:00 Comments || Top||

#2  My take on this is that the teachers were not mocking the Prophet. Since the biography, the central theme of the test, had a strong focus on personal characteristics - including hygiene, physical appearance and eating habits of the Prophet, whoever wrote and administered the exam was most likely mocking Ayatollah Tabatabai and the idiot mullah(s) who designated his biography for testing knowledge. Riots in the streets of Karachi and Islamabad in 1-- 2-- 3--
Posted by: GK || 02/26/2007 19:22 Comments || Top||

#3  Good lord. And in the Guardian, no less. Good catch, Zenster.
Posted by: trailing wife || 02/26/2007 19:26 Comments || Top||

#4  I think the MPs don't realize that studying Mo's habits are vital to being a proper muslim. These questions are not even close to being the most yukky things discussed in the hadith.

To my recollection, there are several passages in the hadith about how Mo wiped your butt, whether you should use sand afterward, etc. There are several about which breast he fondled first for various wives at various times.
Posted by: mhw || 02/26/2007 20:31 Comments || Top||

#5  Reads more like a Kiddie Primer - no wonder the MPs are po'ed.
Posted by: JosephMendiola || 02/26/2007 20:45 Comments || Top||

#6  here's one yukky hadith (from faithfreedom)

Ibn Abbas, reported: The Prophet of Allaah (sallAllaahu alayhi wa sallam) came out of the privy after relieving himself, and food was brought to him and he took it, and did not touch water. In another narration transmitted by Sa'id b. al-Huwairith it is like this: It was said to the Prophet of Allaah (sallAllaahu alayhi wa sallam) You have not performed ablution. He said: I do not intend to say prayer that I should perform ablution.

وَحَدَّثَنِي مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ عَمْرِو بْنِ عَبَّادِ بْنِ جَبَلَةَ، حَدَّثَنَا أَبُو عَاصِمٍ، عَنِ ابْنِ جُرَيْجٍ، قَالَ حَدَّثَنَا سَعِيدُ بْنُ حُوَيْرِثٍ، أَنَّهُ سَمِعَ ابْنَ عَبَّاسٍ، يَقُولُ إِنَّ النَّبِيَّ صلى الله عليه وسلم قَضَى حَاجَتَهُ مِنَ الْخَلاَءِ فَقُرِّبَ إِلَيْهِ طَعَامٌ فَأَكَلَ وَلَمْ يَمَسَّ مَاءً ‏.‏ قَالَ وَزَادَنِي عَمْرُو بْنُ دِينَارٍ عَنْ سَعِيدِ بْنِ الْحُوَيْرِثِ أَنَّ النَّبِيَّ صلى الله عليه وسلم قِيلَ لَهُ إِنَّكَ لَمْ تَوَضَّأْ قَالَ ‏"‏ مَا أَرَدْتُ صَلاَةً فَأَتَوَضَّأَ ‏"‏ ‏.‏ وَزَعَمَ عَمْرٌو أَنَّهُ سَمِعَ مِنْ سَعِيدِ بْنِ الْحُوَيْرِثِ ‏.

here's another

Abu Huraira reported: The Messenger of Allaah (way peace he upon him) said: When anyone performs ablution he must clean his nose and when anyone wipes himself with pebbles (after answering the call of nature) he must do that odd number of times.
حَدَّثَنَا يَحْيَى بْنُ يَحْيَى، قَالَ قَرَأْتُ عَلَى مَالِكٍ عَنِ ابْنِ شِهَابٍ، عَنْ أَبِي إِدْرِيسَ الْخَوْلاَنِيِّ، عَنْ أَبِي هُرَيْرَةَ، أَنَّ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم قَا
لَ ‏"‏ مَنْ تَوَضَّأَ فَلْيَسْتَنْثِرْ وَمَنِ اسْتَجْمَرَ
فَلْيُوتِرْ ‏"‏ ‏
Posted by: mhw || 02/26/2007 21:06 Comments || Top||

#7  One less offensive question, reproduced by local newspapers and websites, lists four choices when asking how Muhammad compared himself with the prophet Joseph. They are: "A) I am more beautiful than Joseph; B) Joseph is more beautiful than me; C) I am cuter than Joseph; D) Joseph is more beautiful than me but I am cuter than him."

So I take it Mo was a gay high school student?
Posted by: tu3031 || 02/26/2007 22:38 Comments || Top||

#8  Always good stuff, Zenster.
Posted by: Phineter Thraviger || 02/26/2007 22:58 Comments || Top||

#9  I must say that's the nicest photo of Ahmadinejad I've seen.
Posted by: Gladys || 02/26/2007 23:12 Comments || Top||


Africa North
Algeria to try deported terror suspects
Two Algerian terror suspects who were deported to their homeland last month have been arrested, imprisoned and charged with terrorist activities, despite being assured by Algerian officials in Britain they would face no criminal proceedings. One of them, known as H, withdrew his appeal against deportation after a British official told the Special Immigration Appeals Commission (Siac) in a statement: "The British government has absolutely no reason to believe that H will be arrested or otherwise detained for a prolonged period of time if deported to Algeria." But his legal advisers and Amnesty International now say they fear he will have to face an unfair trial using evidence obtained by torture.

The development casts doubt on the government's argument that assurances from Algeria can be relied on and suspects can be safely deported, even though the country has refused to enter into a memorandum of understanding guaranteeing their human rights. The news of the Algerians' imprisonment and prosecution comes as the extremist Islamist preacher Abu Qatada awaits a Siac ruling tomorrow on his appeal against deportation to Jordan.

The Algerians are understood to be facing trial for "participating in a terrorist network operating abroad". The second man, Reda Dendani, has been implicated by Mahmoud Meguerba, an intelligence source in the ricin trial, according to information received by Amnesty International. Meguerba, who was not called as a witness because he was considered unreliable, is reported to have been tortured by the DRS, the Algerian military security police.
Continued on Page 49
This article starring:
ABU QATADAal-Qaeda in Europe
Amnesty International
MAHMUD MEGUERBAal-Qaeda in Europe
REDA DENDANIal-Qaeda in Europe
Their lawyer, Gareth Peirce
Posted by: Fred || 02/26/2007 00:00 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:


Britain
Al-Qa'eda 'plotted to kill Blair in front of Queen'
Tony Blair defied an assassination threat from al-Qa'eda to take part in the Queen's Golden Jubilee celebrations in central London, it can be revealed for the first time. Tony Blair with the Queen: the Prime Minister became a target after he deployed British air power and troops to Afghanistan

The risk to the Prime Minister was disclosed to a new BBC documentary by Lord Stevens, the Metropolitan Police Commissioner in 2002. He positioned marksmen around Buckingham Palace in readiness for an attack by bombers or snipers. Lord Stevens, talking for the first time about the alleged plot, said: "There was a threat against the Prime Minister over the Queen's Jubilee period. It was an assassination threat. There was good reason to believe that the threat was credible."

Mr Blair had become a target after backing the overthrow of the Taliban in Afghanistan by the deployment of British air power and troops. He was also using his diplomatic influence to try to generate support for President George W Bush to invade Iraq. The climax of the celebrations in the summer of 2002 was a street party in The Mall attended by the Queen and senior members of the Royal Family.
Continued on Page 49
Posted by: tipper || 02/26/2007 09:17 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Wasn't this the plot of one of the "Naked Gun" movies...
Posted by: tu3031 || 02/26/2007 13:57 Comments || Top||

#2  Where is Frank Drebin when you need him? In the beginning of the "Naked Gun 1", he showed us how to deal with ayatollahs and third world tin-hat dictators, didn't he?
Posted by: anonymous5089 || 02/26/2007 14:20 Comments || Top||

#3  Wasn't "Hillary Rodham Hussein" mentioned in one of the "Naked Gun" movies?
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418 || 02/26/2007 16:35 Comments || Top||

#4  Iff they can get to Blair, why not the Queen herself + Royals + Parliament???
Posted by: JosephMendiola || 02/26/2007 18:07 Comments || Top||

#5  Glad you're on our side Joe. You have the makings of a Mastermind.
Posted by: Shipman || 02/26/2007 21:32 Comments || Top||


Blair will be remembered like Churchill: Jaafari
British Prime Minister Tony Blair will go down in history like his World War II predecessor Winston Churchill, former Iraqi prime minister Ibrahim al Jaafari told The Sunday Telegraph newspaper. Jafaari, who stepped down in April last year, told the British weekly that Blair’s backing for the March 2003 US-led invasion of Iraq will be judged comparable to Churchill standing up to Nazi Germany’s leader Adolf Hitler.

He said that ousting Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein from power would be something future generations of Britons would be “proud of.” “What Tony Blair has done in Iraq is something that is very important, and history will remind us of that. He has helped the Iraqi people to get rid of Saddam Hussein,” Jaafari said.

“Unfortunately, I see the situation in the West and how they deal with the Iraqi crisis now. But future generations, I think, will see Tony Blair’s decision to get rid of Saddam Hussein in the same way as Winston Churchill got rid of Hitler.” He added: “We know that he (Saddam) had weapons of mass destruction because he used them in 1988. It is not a question of what he didn’t have, it is what he did have. That is what the proof should be.” Jaafari said he had seen no evidence that Iran was behind Shia attacks in Iraq.
Posted by: Fred || 02/26/2007 00:00 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Ward Churchill?
Posted by: gromgoru || 02/26/2007 3:03 Comments || Top||

#2  I think Jaafari is right, but that history will be written in a very different future to our present.
Posted by: phil_b || 02/26/2007 4:39 Comments || Top||

#3  Assuming we don't lose, of course. In which case the only "history" will be mumbled from Orcish scrolls.
Posted by: Excalibur || 02/26/2007 9:07 Comments || Top||

#4  It's completely astounding to me that someone like Jaafari sees the future (and understands our history) with more clarity than even the homefront politicos do. Is this scrappleface?
Posted by: BA || 02/26/2007 10:32 Comments || Top||

#5  The Shi'ite leprechaun (as we used to call him, somewhat affectionately, though he was not up to the very difficult task presented him) is correct, most likely. Of course, his prediction applies even more forcefully to Dubya. Bush has fallen short of the standards he set in his best days (WRT Iraq, the Paleostinians, in general), but at least he took some consequential decisions whose short-term costs have the political class in hysterics, but which will probably turn out positively even if the exploitation phase has been less than masterfully handled.
Posted by: Verlaine || 02/26/2007 11:28 Comments || Top||


Qatada set to appeal amid fears of torture
Lawyers acting on behalf of a suspected terrorist, accused of being 'Osama bin Laden's ambassador in Europe', are expected to appeal against plans to return him to Jordan if a court rules tomorrow that he should be deported. Abu Qatada, an extremist preacher whose videos were found in the Hamburg flat of Mohammed Atta, one of the 9/11 hijackers, is being held in a high security prison. The security services privately call him the most dangerous man in Britain, but human rights groups warn that a decision to deport him will represent a worrying shift in the government's stance on torture.

Human Rights Watch said sending Qatada back to Jordan, which has not signed a treaty banning torture, would set a dangerous precedent. 'There is an important principle at stake here,' said Ben Ward, associate director of HRW. 'The prohibition against torture is an absolute prohibition. Governments are not allowed to deport people to countries which do not outlaw the use of torture, no matter what they have done. Such a ruling would create a loophole in the prohibition on torture.'

The government has signed a memorandum of understanding with Jordan, which it insists will protect Qatada from being tortured if he is returned. It has signed similar understandings with Libya and Lebanon and struck an agreement with the Algerian government over the return of a number of alleged Islamic terrorists. But human rights groups say such agreements will do little to protect deported individuals.
Because they don't trust the governments, which you'd think would cause them to wonder some rather fundamental truths about them. Like they're run by thugs and aren't deserving of any special consideration by the progressive Left.
A verdict in the Qatada case was expected last May. Tomorrow's judgment will be handed down by the Special Immigration Appeals Court (Siac), which hears cases against alleged terrorists who are appealing against deportation. Ward said a judgment backing deportation would have widespread ramifications: 'The US and other countries are watching this case with great interest.'

A Siac judgment in March 2004 claimed Qatada was 'at the centre in the United Kingdom of terrorist activities associated with al-Qaeda'. It was said he had links to bin Laden and the then head of al-Qaeda in Iraq, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi. The court heard Qatada entered Britain on a false passport, and had raised funds for terrorist activities and helped to recruit extremists. He was also linked to Abu Doha, an Algerian alleged to have run a terror network operating out of Frankfurt that planned atrocities across Europe as well as a thwarted plot to blow up Los Angeles airport. But Qatada's lawyers say much of the evidence against him was provided by detainees in Guantanamo Bay who claimed falsely that they were tortured and this makes it inadmissible.
This article starring:
Abu Doha
Abu Qatada
Posted by: Fred || 02/26/2007 00:00 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  I got a compromise to keep him from being sent him back to Jordan
Shoot him in the face in England.
Posted by: tu3031 || 02/26/2007 0:07 Comments || Top||

#2  Wondered what ever happened to Dom Delouise. KNow I know.....
Posted by: USN, Ret. || 02/26/2007 17:57 Comments || Top||


China-Japan-Koreas
'Kim Jong-Il preparing collective leadership'
North Korean leader Kim Jong-Il has been preparing a military-led collective leadership to rule the communist country after his death, a news report said on Sunday. Kim, 65, who inherited power from his father, had given up the dynastic succession for various reasons, South Korea’s Yonhap news agency quoted unnamed diplomatic sources in Beijing as saying. “Chairman Kim, who had picked his eldest son Jong-Nam to succeed to him, changed his mind a few years ago and is preparing to allow in a collective leadership system,” one of the sources said.

Some leaders in the North oppose another father-to-son power transfer amid fears that Kim’s entire family could be blamed for economic failure, the sources said. “I understand Chairman Kim is test-running the collective leadership with the military authorities in the centre,” another source said.

Kim is firmly in charge of his nuclear-armed state but with no obvious successor in sight to lead the reclusive regime, which has built a personality cult around his family since its foundation in 1948. He officially took over the leadership from his father and founding president Kim Il-Sung in 1997, three years after the senior Kim died, creating the world’s first communist dynasty.

Kim has survived a decade marked by famine, a collapsing economy and international sanctions, by assiduously cultivating his 1.1 million-strong military. Media speculation has been incessant about who will rule in the post-Kim era, with Kim’s three sons often cited as possible successors.

The eldest son, Jong-Nam, 35, who has reportedly been living a comfortable life in Macau for the past three years and who briefly appeared in Beijing earlier this month to head home for his father’s birthday, is thought to have lost trust by being arrested while trying to enter Japan in 2001 on a forged passport. He has two half brothers -Jong-Chol, 23, and Jong-Woon, 20.
Posted by: Fred || 02/26/2007 00:00 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  As messy and inefficient as it is, one thing democracy does well is to provide for an orderly, non-violent transfer of power. And one of the big problems of choosing dictatorship as a career is that the retirement plans tend to really suck. Just try to imagine what somebody like kimmie does when he gets old and tired or if he finds that playing "Dear Leader" isn't fun anymore. Who do you trust not to shoot you when you give up your guns? Sounds like kimmie can't even trust his own sons.
Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305 || 02/26/2007 11:34 Comments || Top||

#2  North Korean leader Kim Jong-Il has been preparing a military-led collective leadership to rule the communist country after his death, a news report said on Sunday.

Here's hoping that collectivized leadership is as successful (and as lethal to those collectivized) as collectivized farming was.
Posted by: xbalanke || 02/26/2007 13:26 Comments || Top||

#3  Sucks raising loser kids, don't it, Kimmie?
Posted by: tu3031 || 02/26/2007 13:47 Comments || Top||

#4  I'm sorry Jong-Nam, but for someone to have a father who has his own country, and a 1.1 million strong military with nuclear power and there's probably a strong spy force in the country (NKVD style) and you can't get a decent forged passport.

- I taboo these people as nothing more then fools
Posted by: devilstoenail || 02/26/2007 14:57 Comments || Top||

#5  Ralphie Kimmie at Christmas?
Posted by: Nimble Spemble || 02/26/2007 15:15 Comments || Top||


Down Under
Guantanamo inmate lawyers target Australian govt
CANBERRA - Lawyers for Australia’s only Guantanamo Bay inmate David Hicks launched court action against the Australian government on Monday, arguing senior ministers had failed to ensure a fair trial.

Hicks’ Australian-based solicitor David McLeod asked the Federal Court in Sydney to rule on whether senior lawmakers had breached their ministerial duty by approving trial for Hicks through a US military commission. “In effect the courts are being asked to review the actions of ministers in their dealings with other governments,” McLeod told Australian Broadcasting Corp. radio.

The Australian Federal Court was to rule first on whether it had jurisdiction to hear a case which government lawyers said interfered with ministerial control over foreign affairs. Opening the case, Solicitor-General David Bennett said the government had no legal obligation to protect citizens abroad.

But Hicks’ lawyer McLeod said Foreign Minister Alexander Downer and Attorney General Philip Ruddock should have followed the lead of the British government and ensured its citizens were released from Guantanamo Bay. “It’s definitely not a stunt. It’s an opportunity for David’s case to be aired before the courts and for the courts to take a view as to whether or not it has the power and authority to intervene to assist an Australian citizen,” he said.

As the hearing began, six top Australian legal figures wrote a public letter condemning the US military commission process, set up to try Hicks and other detainees. “The fact of the matter is that this is not a regular court, it’s not a properly constituted court and it cannot deliver a fair trial,” group spokesman and former Family Court Chief Justice Alistair Nicholson said.
Posted by: Steve White || 02/26/2007 00:00 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  My question is, why do we continue to avoid treating this prisoners as per the Geneva convention and shooting them when captured. It's all perfectly laid out what fate they should receive. And Taliban Davy can't get a lawyer if he's taking a well deserved dirt nap.

In my opinion, the firing squads should use flamethrowers.
Posted by: Silentbrick || 02/26/2007 10:59 Comments || Top||

#2  This is pure obstruction, If you comit a crime in some foreign country, you're tried in that country, by the laws of that country, by the judges, cops, lawyers Etc, of that country. end of frivilous Aappeal".
Posted by: Redneck Jim || 02/26/2007 12:45 Comments || Top||

#3  I think anybody involved in the David Hicks case, as lawyers, as big-mouthed family members, or in any other capacity, should be locked up in adjoining cells. McLeod is obviously playing for sympathy, knowing good and well that Australia doesn't have to do anything in the Hicks case. Hicks' father is just in a river in Egypt about his son's activities. Hicks himself should be the guest of honor in a good old-fashioned necktie party.
Posted by: Old Patriot || 02/26/2007 13:01 Comments || Top||


Europe
Sarkozy says he would not support a military attack on Iran
French presidential candidate Nicolas Sarkozy said Monday that he would not join up with the United States if it decides to carry out a military action against Iran.

Sarkozy, the French interior minister and leading conservative candidate in the April-May elections, is seen as the most pro-American of France's presidential hopefuls. He said he approved U.N. sanctions against Iran over its nuclear program "and has seen that they are working."

"The municipal elections were a failure for the Iranian president," Sarkozy told RMC radio. President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad suffered a setback in December's municipal elections.

U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates has said the United States has no intention of attacking Iran. But Vice President Dick Cheney has warned that "all options" are on the table if Iran continues to defy U.N.-led efforts to keep Tehran from making nuclear weapons. Iran insists it is only seeking nuclear energy, not arms.

Asked if France would support military action in Iran if he is elected, Sarkozy responded, "No."

"When you see what's happening in Iraq ..." he said, trailing off. France was a leading opponent of the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq in 2003. Sarkozy said U.S. hints that it had not ruled out military action in Iran were "useless posturing." "In international relations, pragmatism is better than posturing," said Sarkozy.

Sarkozy's main likely competitor in the presidential election is Socialist lawmaker Segolene Royal. Both candidates to replace President Jacques Chirac have said that Iran must not be allowed to develop nuclear weapons. But they differ in their tactics.

Royal has said that Tehran should not even have access to civilian nuclear power. That stance has elicited criticism since under the terms of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty, Iran is allowed to have a civilian nuclear program.

Sarkozy agreed that, under the treaty, "Iran and all other countries" have a right to nuclear power. But he said he was "absolutely, totally and completely opposed to nuclear weapons" for Iran.
Posted by: ryuge || 02/26/2007 06:38 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Seriously, what does anyone expect him to say in the midst of his election campaign?
Posted by: doc || 02/26/2007 7:44 Comments || Top||

#2  Notice he has not said he would oppose and that is a big step compared to Shitrak or Segolen Royal-Canin.

For the unitiated: Royal Canin is a brand of dog food.
Posted by: JFM || 02/26/2007 7:58 Comments || Top||

#3  Did anyone ask France to help? Why does he think anyone would?
Posted by: Nimble Spemble || 02/26/2007 8:26 Comments || Top||

#4  At this point, I'd think the only thing we'd like out of France would be for them to cease sending military weaponry to the MMs. That's a start, at least.
Posted by: BA || 02/26/2007 10:43 Comments || Top||

#5  I'm sure Sarkozy is helpful behind the scenes, and knows better than what he says here, but screw him anyway. Him, and all the other politicians who know better but can't find it within themselves to rise 1 degree above the most timid, short-sighted, risky, meek compliance with the idiot media consensus. It's not only strategic incompetence, it's politically inept - solid majorities most places are looking for leadership on security matters, not perfection and instant gratification.

There are a few US congressmen whose recent votes will, hopefully, end their careers. One always wonders where the country found a clue and a spine during times of real crisis ....
Posted by: Verlaine || 02/26/2007 11:21 Comments || Top||

#6  Type French Military Victories in Google , hit " I'm feeling lucky " and laugh at where u go :)
Posted by: MacNails || 02/26/2007 11:31 Comments || Top||

#7  Verlaine

Sarkozy must be elecvted first in order to be of much help against the Mullahs. And for now French public opinion has manipulated ato such extent by the MSM that he cannot tell openly that he would be on America's side. He has done all what he can presntly do; tell he will not be againt America and that is a risk for him

Posted by: JFM || 02/26/2007 12:03 Comments || Top||

#8  Mr Mac Nails

You obviosly cannot pass upion the fact that a Freench girl kicked your ass.

Oh and I forgot that if we look at the record for XVIIIth century plus Naopleonic wards the French lead by 62 victories to 60.
Posted by: JFM || 02/26/2007 12:08 Comments || Top||

#9  And for now French public opinion has manipulated ato such extent by the MSM that he cannot tell openly that he would be on America's side.

Sarko, whom I don't like, and won't vote for, is already seen (labelled) as "an US-poodle" atlantist pro-freemarketers (which is mostly isn't, except by compariosn to the monolithically leftist & statist french political scene IMHO) by the left... AND by the right, both the neo-gaullists (spit) and the paleo far-rightwingers...
Serge de Beketch, Le Pen's passionaria, called him "the procurator of the Us-rael Empire" in his Radio-Courtoisie talk-show...

Incidentally, said radio, which was truly a life-line for me over the last 5 years or so, has been taken over by an enarch, who has expurged all the free-marketers & anti-System hosts, and is overseeing the love-embrace of the remaining lepenists and the technocracy... kinda like Le Pen and his newfound alliance with the anti-jooooos/anti-US leftists and his betrayal of any real conservative values he supposedly tried to promote. Bummer.
Posted by: anonymous5089 || 02/26/2007 12:39 Comments || Top||

#10  Type French Military Victories in Google , hit " I'm feeling lucky " and laugh at where u go :)

Again, the trap of the revisited WWII-worldview, upon which the current System is built, with its Raciiiiists, its Fascists, it's Victims, its Nazzzzis,...
This cliché is a trite anglo-saxon one, and a rather recent one, I'd add. In the 60's, when the french paratroopers had field manoeuvers with their british counterparts, they were seen as rockstars, thanks to their down & dirty counter-insurgency war in algeria... again, al this comes from a revisited WWII, with the cowardly french folding over against the germans, and happily collaborating out of sheer antisemitism, which has some elements of truth regarding segments of our Enlightened Elites (who stil hold power to this day, the technocracy/synarchy was born under Vichy), but which is mostly the work of revisionist/marxist anglosaxons historians in the 70's/80's.
Posted by: anonymous5089 || 02/26/2007 12:45 Comments || Top||

#11  French presidential candidate Nicolas Sarkozy said

Further reading unnecessary.
Posted by: Redneck Jim || 02/26/2007 14:15 Comments || Top||

#12  Type intelligence and NcNails in Google hit I am feeling lucky and have a laugh.
Posted by: JFM || 02/26/2007 14:38 Comments || Top||

#13  JFM:

For the unitiated: Royal Canin is a brand of dog food.

Posted by: BigEd || 02/26/2007 14:46 Comments || Top||

#14  Sarko, whom I don't like, and won't vote for
Wow, anonymous5089 - he's so bad that he's not even worth voting for on a "lesser-of-3-evils" basis? That's depressing!
Posted by: ryuge || 02/26/2007 20:37 Comments || Top||


Fifth Column
European Islam expert says some parts of Sharia applicable in Europe
Posted by: anonymous5089 || 02/26/2007 07:16 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  The one about not living with infidels.
Posted by: JFM || 02/26/2007 7:43 Comments || Top||

#2  The invasion and colonization continues...
Posted by: GK || 02/26/2007 8:59 Comments || Top||


Home Front: Politix
USA Today/Gallop Poll: Bush approval increases to 37%, and 76% amongst Republicans
The Washington punditocracy has proclaimed far and wide that Republicans, disenchanted with the war in Iraq, are abandoning President Bush in droves, leaving him the lamest of lame ducks. However, the latest USA TODAY/Gallup Poll suggests Bush might not be as wounded as he appears — at least not among his party faithful.

The Feb. 9-11 poll puts Bush's job approval at 37%,
up from a low of 31%
but among people who identify themselves as Republican or leaning Republican, his approval rating is 76%.

Thus, despite bad news from Baghdad and carefully crafted hand-wringing by high-profile GOP war critics in Congress such as Sen. Chuck Hagel of Nebraska, three of four Republicans in the country are hanging in there with the president.

The poll also shows that rank-and-file Republicans have higher regard for the president than they do Republicans in Congress. They gave GOP lawmakers a 63% job-approval rating, 13 points below Bush's. And 72% of Republicans do not think Bush made a mistake sending U.S. troops to Iraq.

So if congressional Republicans figure the key to re-election in 2008 is taking a hard line against Bush on Iraq, they could be dead wrong. They might lure some independents, but they risk alienating their GOP base. To win, you need solid support from your base plus independents, not independents alone. The latest congressional skirmish over Iraq underscores the point. In the House's non-binding vote to oppose the president's deployment of more troops to Baghdad, 17 Republicans voted with 229 Democrats to pass the measure. Four GOP representatives didn't vote. Lost was the fact that 180 Republicans stuck with Bush. By that count, Bush gets a 92% loyalty standing among House Republicans who voted. Hardly a GOP exodus.

In the Senate, Democrats fell four votes short of the 60 needed to force a vote on an identical Iraq resolution. Why? Not enough Republicans would go along. Indeed, seven GOP senators broke with the president, and nine didn't vote, yet 33 held firm. Among GOP senators who voted, that's an 83% Republican loyalty rating for Bush.

Richard Benedetto retired last year as White House correspondent for USA TODAY. He teaches journalism and politics at American University in Washington and is author of Politicians Are People, Too.
Perhaps there's yet hope for the profession of journalism.
Posted by: trailing wife || 02/26/2007 13:13 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  And, the remaining 24% of Repubs are only dissatisfied with the Prez cause he hasn't gone far enough in many issues:

* Taking the gloves off in Iraq.
* Gettin' ready to rumble in Iran.
* Spending issues.
* Illegal immigration issues.

Boy, the MSM would swoon if'n they knew what the "rest of us" were really thinking. But, no, they'll just spin it as 24% are dissatisfied.
Posted by: BA || 02/26/2007 13:51 Comments || Top||

#2  And, the remaining 24% of Repubs are only dissatisfied with the Prez cause he hasn't gone far enough in many issues:

* Taking the gloves off in Iraq.
* Gettin' ready to rumble in Iran.
* Spending issues.
* Illegal immigration issues.


From Southern California... at your service...
Posted by: BigEd || 02/26/2007 14:32 Comments || Top||

#3  I do not approve and am registered Republican BECAUSE he hasn't done enough.

More border/illegal immigration enforcement.
Stop dicking with Iran
Act like we are in a war in Iraq
Stop spending like a drunken sailor
Posted by: DarthVader || 02/26/2007 14:39 Comments || Top||

#4  Prior comments in this thread: nail, meet very large and accurately wielded hammer. Repeatedly.
Posted by: mac || 02/26/2007 17:31 Comments || Top||

#5  Bush's biggest mistake, if indeed it was a mistake, was perhaps a philosophical one.

Note that he almost never vetoed a bill, save for stem cells. This leads me to suspect that he believes it is up to the Congress to *formulate* domestic policy. This was first believed by two Presidents in the late 19th Century.

However, he has issued numerous signing statements, interpreting how he feels the president should *interpret* the laws passed by congress. This is very paradoxical, and down the road will set up a major fight between the two branches.

Congress, for their part, abused the hell out of Bush's non-guidance, did not take their responsibility seriously, and paid for it in the election.

In a way, this might be an "in your face" to the SCOTUS, for overturning the Presidential line item veto, by showing that Congress has no discipline.

Or, it might be a way to get Congress to assert more authority, after giving the Presidency much more power in recent years.

There is much that could be said about such a philosophy, that the President should firstly be the foreign policy of the US, and second be the executive of Congressional domestic policies.

But until Congress both behaves and asserts its own power and authority, they will be the weak link in the government. But both parties' congressional leadership is very weak compared to what it once was, and lacks the firm discipline that used to exist in both houses.
Posted by: Anonymoose || 02/26/2007 19:21 Comments || Top||

#6  Yeah, Bush has been a HUGE disappointment. But, when you consider the alternative *spit* Pelosi, Murtha *spit*, he's not too bad.
Posted by: DMFD || 02/26/2007 22:45 Comments || Top||


Halfbright supports Hilldebeast
email received today by KJL at Nat Review
Dear Kathryn,

I'll never forget that moment in 1995 when I watched Hillary Clinton stand up in Beijing and declare that "women's rights are human rights." In front of the whole world, Hillary spoke out for every woman who suffered from inequality, injustice, and repression....

I've known Hillary for nearly 20 years. I've stood side-by-side with her as she took on the fight for women's rights at home and abroad ...
[I can't think of a forceful protest against honor killing, female genital mutilation and religiously sanctioned wife beating but there is probably some obscure tangential criticism of these things in some article somewhere] ...
Don't let this opportunity pass by. Don't stand on the sidelines as Hillary walks through the critical early weeks of her amazing journey.

Support Hillary's "One Week, One Million" campaign right now.

Click to Contribute: =[ deleted ]

Thank you so much for acting early to get Hillary's campaign — and America's future — moving forward.

Sincerely,

Madeleine Albright
Hard to think about Hillary without thinking about the blond US senator who went to Wolframhart to get dirt on her opponent (who was appealing to woman voters in her state) and said, "I didn't rise up from the pits of hell and take human form just to lose the chick vote".
Posted by: mhw || 02/26/2007 12:18 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  [begin heavy sarcasm]What a shocking development![end heavy sarcasm]
Posted by: Jonathan || 02/26/2007 12:49 Comments || Top||

#2  Where is the surprise meter?

Al
Posted by: Frozen Al || 02/26/2007 12:51 Comments || Top||

#3  And what a remarkable woman we're putting forward into this historic moment: strong, smart, experienced, and deeply committed to the values you and I share.

Eww...
Posted by: tu3031 || 02/26/2007 12:57 Comments || Top||


India-Pakistan
Islamic Summit In Islamabad Worries Tehran
Tehran, 26 Feb. (AKI) - A meeting of foreign ministers of Pakistan, Turkey, Indonesia, Malaysia, Egypt, Jordan and Saudi Arabia in the Pakistani capital Islamabad on Sunday reportedly worries Iran which was not invited to attend. Though Pakistan has officially denied Arab news reports claiming the summit was organized by Muslim Sunni countries to discuss strategies to stop the growing power of Shiite Iran in the region, the Iranian government is reportedly worried the allegations might be true.
Psssst! Iran! They're plotting against you. I suggest you do something about it before it's too late. How about a premptive strike?
The Islamabad talks were officially summoned to discuss violence in Iraq and the international crisis over Iran's nuclear programme, which the international community fears is aimed at building nuclear weapons.


Posted by: Steve || 02/26/2007 15:10 || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  We are fast approaching the point in the WOT were we truley reach a turning point. Not in the sence in the end but in the sense were it is about to get real real ugly and then depending on how things go will depend if it will be down hill from there or not.

Anyon who on 9-11 thought we were going to execute a WOT without at some point having to throw with Iran the sole "Islamic Nation" on earth that openly proudly supports terrorist groups of many stripe were either stupid, unrealistic, or just not versed in recent history.
Posted by: C-Low || 02/26/2007 15:43 Comments || Top||


International-UN-NGOs
UN raises alarm on mercenary recruitment by western firms
Posted by: anonymous5089 || 02/26/2007 09:19 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Geez, when I think of all the talent the US *could* get, if we seriously recruited mercenaries, through northern and eastern Europe, the Americas, Asia, Oceania, and Africa.

We could assemble 2 Corps, train them for desert and jungle operations in Africa and the Philippines, and put their HQ on a considerably enlarged Johnston Island. The US military would provide them with officers and logistics support.

Then we could send them to do the crap UN missions, intervene in civil wars, suppress Islamists, etc., at the cost of about a US brigade.
Posted by: Anonymoose || 02/26/2007 13:11 Comments || Top||

#2  Somebody's been reading a little too much Machiavelli lately.
Posted by: gromky || 02/26/2007 20:44 Comments || Top||

#3  My idea is both that they would be like the French Foreign Legion, and that we could send them on crap duty like UN peacekeeping missions. Far better that they go, than American troops.

For example, they could be used right now to augment US or NATO forces in Iraq or Afghanistan, taking off some of the pressure.

Second, this would mean that the US could volunteer them for a lot of UN missions, keeping the dominant role by sheer numbers--a useful extension of our foreign policy.
Posted by: Anonymoose || 02/26/2007 21:23 Comments || Top||


Iraq
Egypt Closes Satellite TV Feed From Iraq
Follow-up on that story; Besoeker was right.
CAIRO, Egypt - Egypt has stopped its satellite transmission of a private Iraqi channel whose pro-Sunni programming came under criticism from the U.S. and Iraqi governments, an Information Ministry official said Monday. The chairman of the board of NileSat, the country's government-owned satellite, said the Al-Zawraa feed was cut for technical reasons and not as an act of censorship. The channel's owner said the move as politically motivated and said he would sue Egypt. "The transmission frequency of the channel interferes with the other channels broadcast by NileSat," Amin Basyouni, NileSat's chairman, told The Associated Press. "We have no authority over what these channels show. We believe in freedom of expression."

Al-Zawraa's owner, Mishan al-Jabouri, was skeptical and said he would sue. "The Americans are very angry with the station because it shows the real image of resistance, not so-called terrorism, and increasing resistance against the occupation," Al-Jabouri said in a phone call from Damascus, Syria, where he lives in exile. "It seems as if the Egyptians are punishing us for that." Al-Jabouri said his channel is still being transmitted by another satellite, Arabsat.

Al-Jabouri, a Sunni Iraqi lawmaker, was accused of embezzling $7 million from an oil pipeline security fund in October, stripped of his parliamentary immunity and fled to Syria.
Al-Jabouri, a Sunni Iraqi lawmaker, was accused of embezzling $7 million from an oil pipeline security fund in October, stripped of his parliamentary immunity and fled to Syria. His Al-Zawraa broadcasts pictures of insurgent attacks on U.S. and Iraqi forces, showing their vehicles exploding. It also shows bloody and mutilated bodies of civilians, including women and children, saying they are Sunnis who were killed by U.S. and Iraqi forces or Shiite militiamen. The channel has accused the Shiite-led Iraqi government of killing Sunnis and being a front for Iran.

Iraqi security forces shut down Al-Zawraa's Baghdad offices in November, saying it was "inciting hatred and instigating violence." But it has managed to continue operating, apparently working from Sunni areas of Iraq. The State Department said last month that the U.S. and Iraqi embassies in Cairo had asked the Egyptian government to remove the channel from NileSat. Basyouni, the NileSat chairman, said Al-Zawraa pays the company $300,000 a year for transmission. He said he could not shut down the channel without an order from the Egyptian government, which he said he has not received.
This article starring:
Amin Basyouni, NileSat's chairman
MISHAN AL JABURIAl-Zawraa
Al-Zawraa
Posted by: anonymous5089 || 02/26/2007 12:25 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  I think this answers a previous post. The answer is appropriate.
Posted by: Whiskey Mike || 02/26/2007 12:48 Comments || Top||

#2  Sorry Besoeker, I should have id'ed you as the commenter.
Posted by: Whiskey Mike || 02/26/2007 12:49 Comments || Top||

#3  Might be fun to find Mishan in a Damascus dumpster.
Or a couple...
Posted by: tu3031 || 02/26/2007 22:48 Comments || Top||


Iraq president 'stable' in Jordan
Posted by: anonymous5089 || 02/26/2007 11:05 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Amman - Iraqi President Jalal Talabani is 'in very good health', his doctor Yadkar Rauf Hishmat told reporters Monday. However, Hishmat said medical staff had decided he should remain at hospital for 'several days.'

The Iraqi leader was flown to Amman at midnight Sunday after suffering a sudden ailment and later admitted to the King Hussein Medical Centre. Preliminary reports suggested 74-year-old Talabani suffered a heart attack, but his doctor affirmed Monday that the examinations showed that his heart was '100 per cent sound'.

Jordan's King Abdullah II earlier in the day visited Talabani and wished him a 'swift recovery.' He earlier instructed the Royal Medical Services to 'extend the best services and facilities to President Talabani until he recovers,' according to an official statement.

Head of the Kurdish mission accompanying Talabani, Mulla Bakhtiar, told reporters at the hospital that the sudden illness was due to 'fatigue resulting from the burdens he is bearing owing to the difficult circumstances through which the Iraqi people are passing.'

According to reports from Iraq's northern Kurdish province, Talabani was facing a mutiny at his party, the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK).
Posted by: Steve || 02/26/2007 13:29 Comments || Top||

#2  Fake "Fall down and Go Boom? Get Publicity and Sympathy? Or Doctors Lying? You decide.
Posted by: Redneck Jim || 02/26/2007 14:24 Comments || Top||

#3  May be the Jooos gave him the Arafat mystery disease. Or may be the one they gave old Saudi King Fahd. It got loose and afflicted their own Ariel Sharon too. Get nervous, Iranian leaders - you might be next. (Don't sleep, that's when it'll get you - take some of that amphetamine stuff you give the jihadis, that should do the trick.)
Posted by: Glenmore || 02/26/2007 16:23 Comments || Top||


Iraq TV Shows U.S. Troop Deaths
A three-month-old Iraqi satellite TV station is broadcasting graphic videos of U.S. soldier deaths along with anti-American speeches.

The Chicago Tribune says U.S. and Iraqi officials would like to shut down the station, Al-Zawraa TV, but have not been able to do so.

Al-Zawraa TV is owned by Sunni politician Mishan al-Jibouri, who fled to Syria last year and runs it out of his Damascus apartment, the Tribune reported.

Al-Jibouri said his video comes from insurgent Web sites.

"I am convinced millions of people watch this channel," al-Jibouri told the Tribune. "I receive thousands of e-mails every day from Arabs inside and outside the Arab world supporting me."

Many Iraqis check the station once or twice daily, Sunni parliamentarian Salim Abdullah said.

"There are too many repeats to watch it all the time, but people like to check it every day," he told the newspaper. "Whether you love it or hate it, everyone is eager to see what's new ... and it's a change from the regular news, which only shows civilians getting blown up." (c) UPI
Posted by: anonymous5089 || 02/26/2007 06:12 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  The Chicago Tribune says U.S. and Iraqi officials would like to shut down the station, Al-Zawraa TV, but have not been able to do so.

Appears the land of the Pharos owns the satelite being used. One must wonder if the threat of losing in excess of $ 1B per year in US Foreign aid might convince President Mubarak to look into the matter.
Posted by: Besoeker || 02/26/2007 6:34 Comments || Top||

#2  Egypt has acted: see this.
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418 || 02/26/2007 16:50 Comments || Top||


Talabani in Jordan for tests
Iraqi President Jalal Talabani fell ill Sunday and was rushed unconscious to a hospital before being flown to neighboring Jordan for an immediate medical checkup, medical and government officials said. Talabani's son, Qubad Talabani, said his father was suffering from fatigue and exhaustion. "He did not have a heart attack" or a stroke, he told CNN. He said his father had "made his own way off the plane" when he landed in Jordan. "He's absolutely up and about, being able to communicate," the president's son said.

Iraq's ambassador to Jordan, Saad Al-Hayyani, told The Associated Press Talabani had not suffered a heart attack or stroke. A brief statement issued by Talabani's office said the 73-year-old president had fallen ill because of "continuing hard work over the past few days," but added there was "no cause for worry."
Posted by: Fred || 02/26/2007 00:00 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  "Carried off unconcious" Ain't good.
Posted by: Redneck Jim || 02/26/2007 10:10 Comments || Top||

#2  Not waking up is even worse.
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418 || 02/26/2007 16:40 Comments || Top||


33 books on Iraq reviewed
The Iraq war has pumped adrenaline into the publishing industry. Whereas five years ago, few bookstores included any selections on Iraq, today dozens of Iraq books line the shelves. There have been three waves of Iraq-related publishing: First came the embed accounts that described the military campaign; second were examinations of prewar planning and, third, studies of the occupation.

Quantity does not equal quality, though, nor does popularity correlate to accuracy. Many of the most popular books have been deeply flawed. Many authors use their Iraq narrative to promote other agendas, be they related to U.S. domestic politics, U.N. empowerment, or independence for Kurdistan. Other authors have substituted theory for fact or tried to propel their experience into the center of the Iraq policy debate.

While time has already relegated much Iraq-related writing to the secondhand shelf or dustbin, several authors have produced works that will make lasting contributions, be they to future generations of war and post-conflict reconstruction planners, or scholars looking more deeply into the fabric of Iraq.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble || 02/26/2007 00:00 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Either pundits blame the Islam cult for terror and instability, or they have it wrong.
Posted by: Sneaze || 02/26/2007 4:50 Comments || Top||

#2  I mostly prefer books written by "boots on the ground" about Iraq.
Posted by: JohnQC || 02/26/2007 12:49 Comments || Top||


Israel-Palestine-Jordan
Israel to hold nationwide nuclear attack drill
JERUSALEM (AFP) - Israel will next month stage its first-ever nationwide drill simulating a nuclear and chemical missile attack on its cities, rescue services said Monday. The exercise was initiated by the army's homefront corps in the wake of last summer's war in Lebanon and Iran's calls for the destruction of the Jewish state and its controversial nuclear programme.

Israel suspects is Iran is aiming to develop an atomic bomb, but Tehran insists its programme is for civilian energy purposes.

The main scenarios which will be simulated are a massive rocket attack on cities as well as a "conventional and non-conventional missile attack," Magen David Adom rescue services spokesman Yerucham Mandola told AFP.

During the drill -- which will include army rescue forces, police, medical and firefighting services -- air-raid sirens may be sounded across the entire country.

The Hezbollah militia fired over 4,000 rockets against northern Israel during the war last summer, killing more than 40 civilians and paralysing the region's industry and economy.

During the 1991 Gulf War, Israeli citizens were equipped with gas masks out of fear of a chemical attack. None of the missiles fired from Iraq against Israel were equipped with chemical warheads.
Posted by: tu3031 || 02/26/2007 11:56 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  When will the US hold a regional nuclear attack drill?
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418 || 02/26/2007 16:41 Comments || Top||

#2  Good cover. Nothing like having a drill when it might actually be needed.

;)
Posted by: DanNY || 02/26/2007 19:47 Comments || Top||

#3  Nuclear attack drill can mean be read at least 2 ways.
Posted by: Shipman || 02/26/2007 21:36 Comments || Top||


Report: 3 Gulf states agree to IAF overflights en route to Iran
Three Arab states in the Persian Gulf would be willing to allow the Israel Air force to enter their airspace in order to reach Iran in case of an attack on its nuclear facilities, the Kuwaiti newspaper Al-Siyasa reported on Sunday.

According to the report, a diplomat from one of the gulf states visiting Washington on Saturday said the three states, Qatar, Oman and the United Arab Emirates, have told the United States that they would not object to Israel using their airspace, despite their fear of an Iranian response.

Al-Siyasa further reported that NATO leaders are urging Turkey to open its airspace for an Attack on Iran as well and to also open its airports and borders in case of a ground attack.

According to a British diplomat who spoke to an Al-Siyasa correspondent, Turkey will not repeat the mistake it made in 2003, when it refused to open its airspace to U.S. Air Force overflights en route to attacking Iraq.

British newspaper The Daily Telegraph reported Saturday that Israel is negotiating with the U.S. over permission for an "air corridor" over Iraq, should an attack on Iran's nuclear facilities become necessary.

Deputy Defense Minister Ephraim Sneh on Saturday denied the reports and said Israel has no such plans.
Posted by: tipper || 02/26/2007 10:27 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:


Todays episode of "Palis n' Guns"
PCHR’s preliminary investigation indicates that at approximately 20:30 on Sunday, 25 February 2007, the body of Khalil Sufian El-Mathloum (16-year old resident of Sabra Quarter in Gaza City) was brought to Shifa Hospital in Gaza City. The boy was killed by a bullet to the chest which was accidentally fired from a firearm mishandled by one of his friends in Remal Quarter in the city.

At approximately 19:30 on the same day, Mohammad Abdel Rahman Ali (6) from Zaitoon Quarter in Gaza City was injured by a bullet in the right thigh. The boy was walking with his father; and was injured when a bullet was accidentally fired from a firearm mishandled by a friend of the boy’s father. He was taken to Shifa Hospital for treatment, where the injury was listed as moderate.

At approximately 13:00 on the same day, Basel Fathi Dawoud, a 24-year old resident of Beit Lahia in the north of the Gaza Strip, was seriously injured by a bullet in the head. The bullet was accidentally fired by a friend of the victim who mishandled his weapon.
"Hey, y'all! Look what happens when I do this! [KERBLASTO!]... Whoa! Sorry, Basel! You okay?... Basel?... Somebody wanta call an ambulance?"
PCHR is concerned over the continued falling of victims due to the misuse of weapons. The Centre calls upon the PNA, represented by the Attorney-General, to seriously investigate these crimes, and bring the perpetrators to justice.
Smart move by the PCHR, having a template and all...
This article starring:
Basel Fathi Dawoud
Khalil Sufian El-Mathloum
Mohammad Abdel Rahman Ali
Posted by: tu3031 || 02/26/2007 09:53 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  "misuse of weapons" in pali-land. where to begin.
Posted by: PlanetDan || 02/26/2007 11:03 Comments || Top||


Israeli companies suspected of aiding Hamas and Islamic Jihad
The police's international crimes unit is investigating whether two Israeli companies, both based in Ramat Gan, helped fund the activities of terror organizations.

Shintraco, which imports and markets basic food products, and Mayan, which provides freight forwarding and customs brokerage services, are suspected of helping a Palestinian company circumvent import restrictions imposed by Israel after it became clear that the company had financially supported Hamas and Islamic Jihad activity in the Palestinian territories.

Police have arrested Shalum Hatuka, the managing director of Shintraco, who denied all charges. The Petah Tikva Magistrate's Court extended Hatuka's remand by two days yesterday. Other workers at both companies were detained for questioning.

The international crimes unit began its investigation last year in the wake of intelligence information relating to the two Israeli companies. The Shin Bet security service, Israel Tax Authority, Defense Ministry and the Justice Ministry unit that investigates money-laundering were all involved in the probe.

Shintraco is suspected of working with Palestinian company Faiz Abu Akar, which also imports and exports food products. The defense minister declared the Palestinian company to be an unauthorized organization in 2005 due to findings that it had systematically assisted Hamas and Islamic Jihad.

Police suspect that the Abu Akar company used Shintraco and Mayan to get around import restrictions in a bid to import goods to the Gaza Strip. Police said yesterday that the Defense Ministry had previously told Shintraco owners that they were not authorized to have any business ties with Abu Akar. Mayan had also been told that the sanctions had been imposed on the Palestinian company.

Police have reported an increase over the past year in the flow of clandestine finance to Palestinian militant groups squeezed by a financial blockade imposed by international aid donors since Hamas last year won parliamentary elections and control of the Palestinian government.
Posted by: ryuge || 02/26/2007 07:04 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Too bad we don't have death penalty.
Posted by: gromgoru || 02/26/2007 7:59 Comments || Top||

#2  Actually you do. Unfortunately, the other side is the only one allowed to carry it out.
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418 || 02/26/2007 16:48 Comments || Top||


Islamic Jihad said to be ready to join PLO
Mohammed al-Hindi, a senior Islamic Jihad official, said on Sunday that his movement was ready to join the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) when it is reshuffled. Al-Hindi told media that a reformed PLO would have a "true political partnership with everyone" and the organization was the only way out of the political crisis.

Al-Hindi added that his movement will not join any government or institution based on the 1993 Oslo Accords between Israel and the Palestinians.
Prime Minister-designate Ismail Haneya of Hamas is holding talks with all factions on forming a national unity government, al-Hindi said, adding that his movement will not join any government or institution based on the 1993 Oslo Accords between Israel and the Palestinians. In addition, al-Hindi justified continuous attacks against Israel by saying that "resistance is the only way to respond to the occupation."

"No one meets the occupation by laying down weapons and resorting to negotiations as the only political way," he said.
This article starring:
ISMAIL HANEYAHamas
MOHAMED AL HINDIIslamic Jihad
Islamic Jihad
Palestine Liberation Organization
Posted by: ryuge || 02/26/2007 06:44 || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Thugs decide to join with other thugs to kill Jews. So this is news?
Posted by: WTF || 02/26/2007 21:22 Comments || Top||

#2  Merger, huh?
Must be fun laying off insane guys with guns...
Posted by: tu3031 || 02/26/2007 22:50 Comments || Top||


Abbas arrives in Cairo for talks on Palestinian issue
(Xinhua) -- Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas arrived here on Sunday for talks on forming a Palestinian national unity government, Egypt's official MENA news agency reported. Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak will meet with Abbas on Mondayto discuss the outcome of a trilateral summit between Abbas, Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice last week, MENA said. The three-way talks in Jerusalem on Feb. 19 failed to achieve tangible progress other than a repeated commitment to a two-state solution to the Palestinian-Israeli conflict.

Abbas and Mubarak will also discuss the outcome of Abbas' recent European tour aimed at rallying support for a Palestinian unity government and revival of the peace process, MENA quoted Palestinian Ambassador to Egypt Monzer al-Dajani as saying. On Feb. 8, Hamas and Fatah agreed in the Saudi city of Mecca on forming a national unity government. Prime Minister Ismail Haneya of Hamas was designated to form the new government.
Posted by: Fred || 02/26/2007 00:00 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:


Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Report: Israel Asks U.S. for Iraqi Airspace Corridor for Iran Strike
Posted by: BrerRabbit || 02/26/2007 11:37 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Enough previews, let's get to the main feature.
Posted by: JohnQC || 02/26/2007 11:53 Comments || Top||

#2  Now is this a leak, or a "Leak*".

*being deliberately released as a leak to give warning to target nation that we are about to quit screwing around.
Posted by: DarthVader || 02/26/2007 12:06 Comments || Top||

#3  We can only prey for Operation: Rolling Thunder to be introduced to Iran
Posted by: devilstoenail || 02/26/2007 14:38 Comments || Top||

#4  It is shameful the Israelis are being left to do what all free peoples should have demanded long ago. Worse yet will be the neo-Nazi "peace protesters" guaranteed to be driven to apoplexy at the thought of the Jews at long last defending themselves against annihilation.
Posted by: Excalibur || 02/26/2007 14:57 Comments || Top||

#5  dropping a tip leak
Posted by: Frank G || 02/26/2007 17:48 Comments || Top||

#6  Iff necessary, Israel will attack wid out US or other Allied permission, in her own interests, and IRAN-SYRIA knows it.
Posted by: JosephMendiola || 02/26/2007 18:10 Comments || Top||


"Devastating response" if Iran attacked
Yeah, yeah, it's WND. Better than AP.

Iran is anticipating a U.S. or Israeli military strike on its nuclear facilities and has been providing Palestinian terrorists and other regional allies with contingency plans for attacks against the Jewish state and American regional interests in the event of war, according to Palestinian terrorist leaders. A senior leader of the Islamic Jihad terror group, which Israel says is backed by Iran, told WND Tehran is expecting to be attacked, but he didn't provide a time frame in which Iran anticipates a strike.

He claimed during any attack his organization has been directed by Iran to "wreck havoc" on Israel as it has been up until now with suicide bombings, rocket attacks and "special surprises." He said rocket attacks would be launched from both the Gaza Strip and from the West Bank, which borders Jerusalem. He threatened his terror group will target American interests in the Middle East as it has been up until now whether any purported strike against Tehran is carried out by Israel or the U.S. "The Zionists and the Americans are coordinated 100 percent. It doesn't matter who attacks Iran, we are planning to hit them both," said the Islamic Jihad leader, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he said the topic was "very sensitive."

He said overall Islamic Jihad leader Ramadan Shallah has been coordinating war plans with Iran, Syria and the Iranian-backed Hezbollah Lebanese militia. Shallah resides in Damascus and travels frequently to Tehran.

Abu Ahmed, the northern West Bank chief of the Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigades terror organization, told WND all major Palestinian militant organizations are preparing to work together in the event Iran is attacked. "Our strategy is not to leave the Islamic alliance (Iran) alone against the enemy. All Palestinian organizations will work together in shooting rockets, suicide bomb attacks and other steps and actions decided closely."

The Brigades is the declared military wing of Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas' Fatah Party. Together with Islamic Jihad, the Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigades has taken responsibility for every suicide bombing in Israel the last two years, including a bombing last month in Eilat and an attack in Tel Aviv last April that killed eight Israelis and American teenager Daniel Wultz. Israel says major Brigades cells in the Gaza Strip and West Bank receive Iranian funding through contacts with Hezbollah.

Abu Ahmed said in his terror group's estimation Iran will indeed be attacked. "It's not a question of if, but when. The campaign now in the American media is just like the campaign before the invasion of Iraq," he charged.

A senior leader of the Popular Resistance Committees terror group, speaking on condition of anonymity, told WND his group has also been preparing for what he called "the upcoming war."

The Committees is a coalition of terror organizations operating in the Gaza Strip and the West Bank responsible for hundreds of anti-Israel rocket and shooting attacks. It is accused of bombing a U.S. convoy in Gaza in 2003 in which three American government contractors were killed. "We are preparing the tomb that Allah is digging for the Zionists and Americans," said the Committees leader. He claimed during any U.S. or Israeli military strike against Tehran, a response will be directed against Israel and American interests by Iran, Syria, Hezbollah and Palestinian terrorists. "The war will be a war on more than one front. It will be everybody against everybody. Iran, Syria, Hezbollah and the Palestinian organizations will work together. War with Iran is coming and it means the Middle East will not remain the same after it," the Committees leader said.

Syria and Iran signed a military agreement in which either will respond if the other is attacked.
Oh, yeah. Please respond, Syria.

Israeli security officials told WND Israel is not currently planning to strike Iran. Speaking theoretically, they said if any war breaks out involving Iran, they expect Syria, Hezbollah and Palestinian terrorists to join the fray and attack Israel.

The security officials said the greatest threat Syria poses to the Jewish state are the country's missiles. They noted Syria recently test-fired two Scud-D surface-to-surface missiles, which have a range of about 250 miles, covering most Israeli territory. The officials said the Syrian missile test was coordinated with Iran and is believed to have been successful. It is not known what type of warhead the missiles were armed with. In addition to longer range Scuds, Syria is in possession of shorter range missiles such as 220mm and 305mm rockets, some of which have been passed on to Hezbollah.

According to information received by Israel, Russia is set to conclude a deal worth several hundred million dollars transferring thousands of advanced antitank missiles to Syria. Antitank missiles used by Hezbollah during Israel's war in Lebanon this past summer devastated Israeli tanks and caused the highest number of Israeli troop casualties during the 34 days of military confrontations.

Last week, a senior officer from the intelligence unit of the Israeli Defense Forces announced Hezbollah is stronger today than before the 2006 Lebanon war. "Hezbollah has reinforced and it is stronger today than it was before the war in Lebanon," General Yossi Beidatz, head of the IDF's intelligence research department, told the Knesset. During the war in Lebanon, Hezbollah fired more than 3,000 rockets into northern Israel, killing 39 civilians and devastating many northern towns.

Beidatz also said Syria is reinforcing its military to prepare for the possibility of a new armed conflict in the region. According to reports in the Israeli media, Syria, aided by Iranian officers, has been boosting its army and navy. The reports, denied by Damascus, claimed Syria last week was moving troops closer to the border with Israel.

The claim by Palestinian terrorists Iran is preparing for war come as Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said yesterday his country's nuclear program cannot stop while a deputy foreign minister vowed Tehran was prepared for any eventuality, "even for war."

"Iran has obtained the technology to produce nuclear fuel and Iran's move is like a train ... which has no brake and no reverse gear, and is headed for a train-wreck" Ahmadinejad said, according to Iranian state media. Manouchehr Mohammadi, a deputy at Iran's foreign ministry commented, "We have prepared ourselves for any situation, even for war."

Iranian military commanders have said recent war games, the latest of which involved testing several missiles this month, show Iran's readiness to counter any attack.

Meanwhile U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney said over the weekend Iran's atomic ambitions must be curbed. He told reporters "all options" were on the table.

During a visit to Australia, Cheney said it would be a "serious mistake" to allow Iran to become a nuclear power. An Australian newspaper quoted Cheney endorsing comments by U.S. Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., that the only thing worse than a military confrontation with Iran would be a nuclear-armed Iran.

Iran ignored last week's United Nations deadline to halt uranium enrichment, a process that can be used to fuel for nuclear power plants or produce material for warheads. Tehran claims it wants to negotiate but has repeatedly ruled out suspending its atomic program.
Posted by: Jackal || 02/26/2007 07:15 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  This would give Israel the golden opportunity to eliminate Fatah, Hamas, and oh yes, Syria in one fell swoop.
Posted by: doc || 02/26/2007 7:41 Comments || Top||

#2  Now, in addition to Dire Revenge(TM), I've to fear Devastating Response(TM).
Posted by: gromgoru || 02/26/2007 7:49 Comments || Top||

#3  If the mooted war comes, Israel should drive all Muslims from the WB and Gaza into Jordan and Egypt. Get rid of them permanently and be done with it.
Posted by: mac || 02/26/2007 7:58 Comments || Top||

#4  No mac......keep em' out of Jordan.
Posted by: ARMYGUY || 02/26/2007 8:11 Comments || Top||

#5  Doesn't this call for a random response on "Iranian"/Twelver/Shiite global interests?
Posted by: Excalibur || 02/26/2007 8:56 Comments || Top||

#6  We have been pussyfooting around with these mullahfuc*kers for 30 years. It is about time to shown them what the hell terror war is really all about. They declared war on us long ago. Let's get on with it.
Posted by: JohnQC || 02/26/2007 11:58 Comments || Top||

#7  Time to dance. Lets see if the US and Israel Air Force can remove the nuke facilities and their key military comms and facilities all in one night. Sort of a modern day "Name that tune" type war. We can wager on how many targets can be hit in Iran in one night. Vegas can take odd on just how silent the border on Israel will be once the paleo's realize their cash cow is dead.
Posted by: 49 Pan || 02/26/2007 12:13 Comments || Top||

#8  Lets make sure barrier dividing Civilisation from Islam is properly manned.
Posted by: Bright Pebbles in Blairistan || 02/26/2007 12:53 Comments || Top||

#9  I want the icing on the cake. If there is some way of cajoling Iran to attack first, and ineffectively, it would take care of LOTS of hassles.

A casus belli would almost have to be one or more ballistic missiles, so that everybody could see where they were coming from and going to.

It would even be best if there were some too-small-to-be-nuclear ones that were fired with the larger ones, that were allowed to impact, again, ineffectively, as evidence.

And it is too important to be left up to Iran to do it the right, wrong way. It should be so blatant that nobody will buy their sniveling excuses and efforts to bullshit their way out of it.
Posted by: Anonymoose || 02/26/2007 13:19 Comments || Top||

#10  'Moose, you're asking for too much. It wouldn't matter if God Himself came down with Moses and stated that Iran had started it, the usual suspects on the left would find some way to spin it into being our fault. Try asking for a pony instead; that's much more likely to show up!
Posted by: mac || 02/26/2007 17:29 Comments || Top||

#11  Hay Mac, Can I have a pony?? LOL!!
Posted by: 49 Pan || 02/26/2007 18:55 Comments || Top||


Tehran to host conference on Latin America on Tuesday
Deputy Foreign Minister for Education and Research Affairs Manouchehr Mohammadi said here Saturday that a day-long conference on Latin America will be held in Tehran on Tuesday, February 27.

Speaking to reporters at a press conference, Mohammadi said the purpose of the conference is to update Iranians with developments in Latin America.

He said that 65 articles, including 35 domestic and 30 foreign ones, have been received by the secretariat of the conference for inclusion in the conference's topics of discussion.

Of the 65 articles, 40 have been accepted and will be presented in the conference.

According to the deputy foreign minister, representatives from 10 countries have signified their desire to participate in the confab.

Articles written by experts from Venezuela, Brazil, Cuba, Colombia, Argentina, Uruguay, Ecuador, Italy, Russia and China will be taken up in the conference, it was further learned.

Cuba's minister of external trade will be among participants in the conference.

An exhibition of documents of cooperation signed between Iran and Latin American states will be held on the sidelines of the conference.
Posted by: anonymous5089 || 02/26/2007 07:16 || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  And what purpose does this Nation of peace (spit cough) want with our neighbors to the South?
Posted by: 49 Pan || 02/26/2007 8:20 Comments || Top||


US aircraft carrier has no plans to “intimidate Iran”
ON BOARD THE USS JOHN C. STENNIS, off the coast of Pakistan - To the deafening roar of war planes taking off from the nuclear-powered US aircraft carrier USS John C. Stennis, US military commanders insist that intimidating Iran is not part of their mission in the region. The carrier and its battle group has been in the Gulf of Oman since February 19, anchored about 120 nautical miles off the coast of Pakistan, in what the US Navy says is a mission to provide support for ground forces operating in Afghanistan and Iraq.
I doubt they're actually 'anchored'.
The Stennis has joined the USS Dwight D. Eisenhower in the area, fuelling speculation that Washington could be preparing for a military strike against arch-foe Iran over its controversial nuclear programme.

But the carrier’s commanding officer Captain Bradley E. Johanson said the vessel was in the region to reassure Washington’s key oil-rich Arab allies in the Gulf Cooperation Council. “We have received very explicit guidance that we will not assume any sort of escalatory posture with Iran,” Johanson told AFP as an F/A-18F Super Hornet took off heading north in the direction of Pakistan and Afghanistan.
"Nope, our F-18s don't intimidate anyone. Why, I gave each plane a specific order not to do any intimidating out there," he added.
“No sort of escalatory posture at all with Iran,” Johanson reiterated. “Our mission is not to go and intimidate Iran. Our mission is to go and make the GCC partner-nations comfortable with the security situation.”

However, US Defence Secretary Robert Gates said in January that reinforcing the US naval presence in the oil-rich region was a message to Iran, which has defied the international community over its nuclear drive. “The nice thing about my position is I don’t have to explain what the Secretary of Defence said,” said Rear Admiral Kevin M. Quinn, commander of Carrier Strike Group Three, formed by the Stennis and its battle group. “There was no word in my tasking to come over here that had anything to do with Iran,” he told AFP.
Nor did there need to be any.
Posted by: Steve White || 02/26/2007 00:00 || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Probably just there for the fishing. The patagonian toothfish is exceptionally tasty this time of year, I'm told.
Posted by: SteveS || 02/26/2007 0:52 Comments || Top||

#2  Mad dogs can't be intimidated---only killed.
Posted by: gromgoru || 02/26/2007 2:58 Comments || Top||

#3  I would say that the real "orders" are still sealed. US objectives in Iran should be achievable by air power alone. Iranians are sick of the Arabist wannabes who plunder their economy. Persia achieved much more that Arabs ever did.
Posted by: Sneaze || 02/26/2007 4:55 Comments || Top||

#4  Anyway, it's been the kinder, gentler army since clinton, I'd say they're here to help and make people feel all warm and fuzzy. Kinda like Santa Claus, only with fighter jets and JDAM instead of reindeers and gifts. Ho ho ho!
Posted by: anonymous5089 || 02/26/2007 5:29 Comments || Top||

#5  I'd say W has taken a page from the book of Foreign Policy of a former President, the antithesis of Jimmy Carter.
Posted by: doc || 02/26/2007 7:43 Comments || Top||

#6  The Stennis has joined the USS Dwight D. Eisenhower in the area, fuelling speculation that Washington could be preparing for a military strike against arch-foe Iran over its controversial nuclear programme.

Let's not talk crazy. The arch-foe of the West is gingivitis.
Posted by: Excalibur || 02/26/2007 8:59 Comments || Top||

#7  The Stennis has joined the USS Dwight D. Eisenhower in the area

Bipartisan. I hope Nan appreciates it.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble || 02/26/2007 9:08 Comments || Top||

#8  Of course, they have no plans to intimidate iran, it's just a cruise... sort of "Love boat" redux, actually.

Posted by: anonymous5089 || 02/26/2007 9:26 Comments || Top||

#9  I doubt they're actually 'anchored'.

Should have said "On Station"
Posted by: Redneck Jim || 02/26/2007 9:49 Comments || Top||

#10  What policy is that, doc?

Speak softly and carry a big JDAM?
Posted by: BA || 02/26/2007 10:40 Comments || Top||

#11  As the saying goes, I bet butter wouldn't melt in that Captain's mouth.
Posted by: Anonymoose || 02/26/2007 13:21 Comments || Top||

#12  They aren't there to intimidate them . . . .
Posted by: gorb || 02/26/2007 15:03 Comments || Top||

#13  "Tis the prob wid Navy steel Bulkheads - you keep talking/demanding from them to know their intentions, they never answer you.
Posted by: JosephMendiola || 02/26/2007 20:53 Comments || Top||

#14  D *** nged airframes also don't like answering questionnes - ITS TREASON, THEY TELLS YA, TREASON.
Posted by: JosephMendiola || 02/26/2007 20:55 Comments || Top||

#15  Methinks the aircraft in the steel beach picture are conveying a secret message: After all they are (the lately retired) Tomcats: Anytime Baby!
Posted by: USN, ret. || 02/26/2007 22:56 Comments || Top||


Cheney arrives in Oman for talks on Gulf security
(Xinhua) -- U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney arrived in Oman on Sunday for talks on Gulf security, media reports reaching here said. Shortly after his arrival, Cheney went into talks with Omani Foreign Minister Yousuf bin Alawi bin Abdullah, an Omani official was quoted as saying. The two sides would discuss regional security issues, including the Iranian nuclear issue, the official said, without giving more details.

Meanwhile, the U.S. Embassy declined to talk about details of the visit, especially the purpose of Cheney's visit to Oman, a U.S. ally for decades. Cheney's visit came after he ended a visit to Australia and made a brief refueling stop in Singapore. During his visit to Australia on Saturday, Cheney refused to rule out the possibility of taking military action against Iran, saying that "all options are still on the table" over Tehran's nuclear programs. He said that Washington was still working with other countries to persuade Tehran to abandon its nuclear programs and preferred to achieve the goal peacefully.

International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) chief Mohamed ElBaradei issued a report on Thursday, saying that Iran had refused to suspend its uranium enrichment, defying a UN Security Council deadline that expired on Wednesday. As an isolated country on the southeastern corner of the Arabian peninsula, Oman sits across the strategically important Strait of Hormuz from Iran, through which two-fifths of the world's oil passes.
Posted by: Fred || 02/26/2007 00:00 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  This explains why his plane put down in Singaporefor repairs en route from Sydney to US.
Posted by: Grunter || 02/26/2007 11:19 Comments || Top||

#2  RIGHTNATION/WORLDNEWS > USA wants "incremental steps" to pressure Iran to give up nucprogrms.
* OTOH, WAFF.com > Iran's SU-30MP's [Persian]. Iranian Air Force pilots allegedly being trained in Russia; + ASIA TIMES > USA has already decided to attack Iran. RUMOR - Russia may sell? MIG-31's to Iran.
Posted by: JosephMendiola || 02/26/2007 20:51 Comments || Top||


Iran defies West's threat to impose more sanctions
(Xinhua) -- The Iranian leadership on Sunday vowed to go on with nuclear program in defiance of the West's threat to impose more sanctions, saying that the Islamic Republic is ready for both talks and possible military attacks by the United States. President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad compared Iran's nuclear program to a "train with no brakes," underlining that Tehran will not rein in its nuclear track. "We have got the nuclear fuel cycle technology. Iran's onward march on this path is just like a train on a one-way track with no room for stopping, reverse gear or braking," the president told a group of religious leaders. We have abandoned the reverse gear and the brakes of the train."
Sorta like a cannon with no moorings...
Meanwhile, Ahmadinejad said that the West felt threatened by Iran's nuclear program because they were afraid of their power diminishing. "The Westerners are not concerned about the existence of our nuclear activities; they are concerned about the collapse of their hegemony and hollow power," he said.

In response to Ahmadinejad's remarks, U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said on Sunday that "they don't need a reverse gear. They need a stop button." Rice told Fox News that "Tehran should stop enriching and reprocessing (work), and then we can sit down and talk about whatever is on Iran's mind."

The UN Security Council adopted Resolution 1737 on Dec. 23, 2006, demanding that Iran stop all enrichment-related and reprocessing activities including research and development and work on all heavy water-related projects in 60 days. Iran refused to heed the demand. The deadline expired on Wednesday. Ahmadinejad's comments came one day before representatives of the five permanent members of the UN Security Council -- Britain, the United States, France, China and Russia -- plus Germany are scheduled to meet in London to discuss further measures against Tehran's tough stance.

Accusing Iran of trying to develop nuclear weapons and assisting Iraqi insurgents in fight against coalition forces in the war-torn country, U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney, during his visit to Australia on Saturday, refused to rule out the possibility of taking military action against Iran, saying that "all options are still on the table" over Tehran's nuclear programs. Cheney said that Washington was still working with other countries to persuade Tehran to abandon its nuclear programs and preferred to achieve the goal peacefully. "But all options are still on the table," Cheney said, adding that it is still being debated at home how to move next to deal with Tehran over the nuclear issue.

However, Iranian Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki has responded by saying that "we do not see the U.S. in a position to impose another crisis on its tax payers inside America by starting another war in the region." Likewise, Deputy Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mohammadi told media that his country was prepared for both war and talks with the United States. "We have prepared ourselves for any situation, even if war happens," he was quoted by the ISNA news agency as saying. "Iran is ready for negotiations without preconditions with the United States, but the Americans have not accepted it yet," he added.

However, former Iranian President Seyed Mohammad Khatami, in a meeting with a group of Christian activists and priests from the United States on Sunday, described both Iranians and Americans as two wise nations, the semi-official Fars news agency reported. He expressed hope that Iran's nuclear issue would be followed and settled through thoughtful measures, and no fresh crisis would arise in the region, saying that any kind of crisis would be detrimental to the region, Iran and the United States. "Negotiation requires good intention and not preconditions, the U.S. administration should, similar to the American nation, act courageously and wisely to find solutions to problems," he said.
Posted by: Fred || 02/26/2007 00:00 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Sanctions are meaningless. Whatever they can't get from Turkey, the Russians and Chinese will deliver. By default, a military solution is our only choice. The status quo is unthinkable.
Posted by: Sneaze || 02/26/2007 5:21 Comments || Top||

#2  "we do not see the U.S. in a position to impose another crisis on its tax payers inside America by starting another war in the region."

Whayh, that's right neighborly of them Iranians! Worryin' 'bout our taxes. 'Cept I doan think they unnerstan' the size of our economy. Twoudn't be nuttin' to send 'em back a coupla hunnert years; nuttin' at all.
Posted by: Bobby || 02/26/2007 6:17 Comments || Top||

#3  We have abandoned the reverse gear and the brakes of the train."

"Cassandra Crossing".
Posted by: Redneck Jim || 02/26/2007 10:13 Comments || Top||

#4  ...a "train with no brakes,"

Yeah, that usually works out well...
Posted by: tu3031 || 02/26/2007 10:16 Comments || Top||

#5  So, after that train with no brakes flies off the track, can we then call it the Gulf of Rumsfeld? Or, does that official renaming still have to go through some U.N. approval process?
Posted by: BA || 02/26/2007 10:30 Comments || Top||

#6  Sanctions don't work. Unless sanctions bring about internal unrest and overthrow of the those in power, they don't work. We learned that from Saddam and Iraq. Saddam continued to get rich with the help of the U.N. in the oil for food program. Unless there is more unrest in Iran than I think, let's get on with taking out their nuclear facilities.
Posted by: JohnQC || 02/26/2007 12:16 Comments || Top||

#7  No Brakes + No Reverse > as said times ago, IRAN > ALL BUT OFFICIALLY DEMANDING TO BE ATTACKED AND INVADED. Can't have anti-US, asymmetric "People's War" warfare, NOR AMER HIROSHIMAS, iff Dubya doesn't unilater invade. Can't have Demmies taking credit for GOP-Right/Conservative achievements while also making sure Dems survive new 9-11's agz Washington DC in order to rule the new Amerika, the mighty world-ruling USSA = weak, anti-sovereign Global SSR/USR. D ***ng it, Russia-China can stay Russia andor China, but only America = Amerika must become the United Socialist Republics!
Posted by: JosephMendiola || 02/26/2007 21:24 Comments || Top||


Hezbollah regroups in a new mountain stronghold
Hezbollah, the militant Shia organisation, is building a new line of defences just north of the United Nations-patrolled zone in south Lebanon ahead of a potential resumption of war with Israel. The military build-up, only six months after the last Lebanon-Israel conflict, is being conducted in valleys and hillsides guarded by uniformed Hezbollah fighters in the rugged mountains north of the Litani river — the limit of the 12,000 strong UN Interim Force In Lebanon (Unifil).

Christian and Druze-owned land is being bought for cash by a Shia businessman. Hezbollah’s opponents believe the goal is to create a Shia-populated belt spanning the northern bank of the Litani, allowing the Lebanese group to operate away from prying eyes. “The state of Hezbollah is already in existence in south Lebanon,” the Druze leader and arch Hezbollah critic Walid Jumblatt told The Times.

Since the end of the month-long clash last summer, Unifil’s strength has increased sixfold, with reinforcements from European countries such as France, Italy and Spain. An additional 20,000 Lebanese troops have flooded the area, making it impossible for Hezbollah to resurrect its military presence along the border with Israel. “There have been no instances of attempts to smuggle weapons into the area,” said Milos Strugar, Unifil’s senior adviser, adding that no armed fighters had been seen since September. Instead, Hezbollah’s fighters are preparing a new system of fortifications and expanding old positions in the mountains on the northern bank of the Litani. Residents say that the activity has increased lately, and peacekeepers confirm this. “We can see them building new positions. There’s a lot of trucks coming into the area as well,” a Unifil officer said.
Continued on Page 49
This article starring:
ALI TAJIDINEHezbollah
Milos Strugar, Unifil’s senior adviser
SHEIKH HASAN NASRALLAH,Hezbollah
SHEIKH NAIM QASEMHezbollah
Walid Jumblatt
Hezbollah
Posted by: Fred || 02/26/2007 00:00 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Normally, this would be a recipie for an airstrike. But in this case, I doubt they will do anything until it is too late.
Posted by: Glairong Elmolump5276 || 02/26/2007 7:27 Comments || Top||

#2  Hezbollah like Taliban is regrouping. Now wait for the dread lebanese winter.
Posted by: JFM || 02/26/2007 7:50 Comments || Top||

#3  Today the ledership of Israel is but a shadow of it's former self, circa 50s, 60s and 70s. if the trend continues Israel's new motto will be..

"almost Never Forget"

Posted by: RD || 02/26/2007 17:57 Comments || Top||

#4  IOW, "Sovereign" Lebanon is losing its territory.
Posted by: JosephMendiola || 02/26/2007 18:55 Comments || Top||


Geagea tells Hezbollah: The Cedar Revolution is our course
Despite claims by Iran that its consultations with Saudi Arabia have led to decreasing tension in Lebanon, Hezbollah continued to trade accusations with the March 14 majority alliance that backs PM Fouad Siniora's government. Mohammed Raad, leader of Hezbollah's parliamentary bloc, has launched a vehement attack on Lebanese Forces leader Samir Geagea and head of the Progressive Socialist Party Walid Jumblatt.

Raad was quoted by the daily an-Nahar as saying Geagea and Jumblatt were against the "principles set by (Ex-Premier) Rafik Hariri and Kamal Jumblatt." Hariri, father of parliamentary majority leader Saad Hariri, was killed by a powerful blast that targeted his motorcade in Beirut on Feb. 14 2005. Kamal Jumblatt, father of Walid and founder of the PSP, was killed in an ambush on March 16 1977. Both crimes have been blamed on the Syrian regime, which is one of Hezbollah's main supporters.

Jumblatt did not respond , since he left for Washington Saturday to discuss the Lebanon situation with U.S. officials. However, Geagea responded quickly to Raad's rhetoric saying the Hezbollah-led opposition has launched a "counter revolution against the Cedars' Revolution in an effort to push the situation back to where it was during the past 15 years," when Syria's army and intelligence ruled Lebanon.

Geagea also escalated his counter attack, stressing that pro-government factions offer for a compromise cabinet that gives the majority 19 seats, the opposition 10 seats and allocates one seat for a neutral minister is a fair solution to all the Lebanese. "The problem is going to be a long one, Lebanon's fate will be decided during this crisis, but this does not prevent reaching provisional settlements," Geagea said.

He stressed that the "real solution (will be achieved) when Lebanon sets course. The Cedar Revolution Course is going ahead," Geagea stressed. Observers say Raad's remarks reflect an effort by Hezbollah and Iran to drive a wedge in the alliance between Hariri , Geagea and Jumblatt, an attempt that the parliamentary majority leader has been aware of and keen on foiling.

In an interview with France press, Geagea said we are ready for decisions that require courage…decisions that are for the sake of Lebanon…decisions that call for a solution to the current crises. However any solution has to include the International tribunal . Geagea reiterated his conviction that the formula of 19 + 10 + 1 offered for a cabinet of national unity remains the best and most logical solution. Geagea called the insistence of the opposition on a cabinet formula of 19 +11 completely unreasonable expectation.
Posted by: Fred || 02/26/2007 00:00 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:


Saudi pressuring Syria to support Lebanon's Hariri Tribunal
Saudi Arabia is trying to persuade Syria to support the creation of the international tribunal to try the suspects in the 2005 assassination of former Premier Rafik Hariri, the Lebanese Central News Agency has reported. The report by Al Markaziya, or CNA, on Friday said that a meeting was expected to be held in Spain within the next few days between Saudi Arabian Foreign Minister Prince Saud al Faisal and his Syrian counterpart, Walid Moallem, already in Madrid on an official visit.

The meeting would be the first between senior leaders from both countries since the Saudi-Syrian rift widened after this summer's Israel-Hezbollah war when Syrian President Bashar Assad labeled several Arab leaders "half men."

CNA, citing diplomatic sources, said the meeting will deal with the Arab summit, which is due in Riyadh in March, and influencing Damascus to adopt the international tribunal. The sources said Faisal was discussing with Spanish leaders the ongoing Lebanese crisis and the need to endorse the tribunal. CNA quoted the sources as saying that once the tribunal is approved by Syria, rival Lebanese groups would then move to discuss the creation of the Special International Tribunal for Lebanon to prosecute Hariri's suspected assassins.

Hariri was killed with 22 other people in a massive suicide truck bombing on Feb. 14, 2005 and many Lebanese blamed Syria for the killing, an allegation denied by Damascus. If Saudi Arabia succeeds in convincing Syria to support the creation of the International Tribunal , this will alleviate the pressure off Hezbollah and its pro-Syrian allies in Lebanon. Hezbollah ministers resigned from the cabinet of Prime Minister Fouad Siniora the night before the scheduled discussion of the tribunal. This was done to protect Syria according to political observers.
Posted by: Fred || 02/26/2007 00:00 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:


Most US intelligence on Iran inaccurate
Most US intelligence on Iran shared with the International Atomic Energy Agency has proved to be inaccurate, The Los Angeles Times reported on its website on Saturday. Citing unnamed diplomats working in Vienna, the newspaper said the CIA and other Western intelligence services have been providing sensitive information to the IAEA since 2002. But none of the tips about Iran’s suspected secret weapons sites provided clear evidence that the country is developing a nuclear arms arsenal, the report said. “Since 2002, pretty much all the intelligence that’s come to us has proved to be wrong,” the paper quotes a senior IAEA diplomat as saying. US officials privately acknowledge that much of their evidence on Iran’s nuclear programme remains ambiguous, fragmented and difficult to prove, the report said.
Posted by: Fred || 02/26/2007 00:00 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Just like most IDF intelligence on Hizbulla shared with UNIFIL "proved" to be inaccurate?
Posted by: gromgoru || 02/26/2007 3:06 Comments || Top||

#2  The LA Times and the rest of the Copperhead media attempting to get out in front of the West acting in self defense. At least when the Mongols arrive we can have the satisfaction of what editors heads thrown onto the pile.
Posted by: Excalibur || 02/26/2007 9:10 Comments || Top||

#3  Well the IAEA can go eff itself in general, but it certainly wouldn't surprise if the CIA matieral were mediocre. I've never been in a loop for this sort of concrete, narrow, actionable intel on a given topic, but the analytical products (and personnel) I've been exposed to over the years (with a few exceptions), have been frighteningly unimpressive. Worse even than the appallingly sophomoric crap that gets "leaked" to the NYT/WaPo complex and is treated as dephic revelation (couldn't be bothered to keep track, but one of my favorites is still the NIE from '04 I think that grimly forecast a Shi'a rebellion against the Coalition if services like electricity etc. were not delivered with a specific time-frame - ludicrous on its face, to say the least). But then again it all started badly for me - in my first ever private briefing back in the 80s I literally had to help the analyst with some specific issues and even translation issues as he "briefed" me on the sitrep in an African conflict. Geez.
Posted by: Verlaine || 02/26/2007 11:55 Comments || Top||

#4  After Iran nukes someone, the surviving MSM will be running the headline: "Why Was US Intelligence on Iran Inaccurate?"
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418 || 02/26/2007 16:46 Comments || Top||


Tomato price hike an enemy plot: Nejad
Iran’s president said on Sunday the country’s enemies had hatched a range of plots to push the Islamic Republic to give up its disputed nuclear programme, including driving up the price of tomatoes and other food. But Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said such tactics would not work, Iran’s ISNA news agency quoted him as saying.

Rising prices, particularly the cost of tomatoes which form an important ingredient in Iranian food, have prompted growing public criticism of Ahmadinejad’s government. The president has often dismissed complaints as media exaggeration. “In order to harm us, they (enemies) make plots, for instance they come and push tomato prices up in the market. They think we will give up our ideals with their plots,” Ahmadinejad said in a speech in which he said Iran would not reverse its atomic plans.

The latest official figures show inflation running at about 16 percent but economists say official figures underplay what Iranians pay for basic food in shops because they are based on a broader basket of goods that includes some subsidised items. “Of course, God willing, the problem of meat, chicken and tomatoes will be solved. One should be aware that our revolution is like a bulldozer ... the enemies think by throwing a few small stones and sand they can stop this bulldozer,” Ahmadinejad said. “Come and buy them from the fresh fruit and vegetable market next door to us. Why are you buying them from expensive places?” said the president, who won over many voters in the 2005 presidential race with his down-to-earth style.
Posted by: Fred || 02/26/2007 00:00 || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  "First, they came for our tomatoes, soon they will come for our precious bodily fluids, and in ther end, they will blow up our nuke program. They're everywhere! Everywhere!"
Posted by: anonymous5089 || 02/26/2007 5:34 Comments || Top||

#2  All the more reason not to allow this lunatic regime the chance to build nuclear weapons
Posted by: Jineque Shomoque1757 || 02/26/2007 6:20 Comments || Top||

#3  Shhh! Don't tell him that tomatoes are an American invader. Vegetable imperialism is everywhere!
Posted by: Spot || 02/26/2007 8:34 Comments || Top||

#4  There was a movie called "The Attack of the Killer Tomatos" back in the 80's.

Coincidence? I think not. Prelude? I'll just leave it at that . . .

/tin foil hat
Posted by: PlanetDan || 02/26/2007 9:35 Comments || Top||

#5  And george clooney played a part in it or a sequel. That should be telling, for people who can read between the lines and see The Grand Masterplan.
Posted by: anonymous5089 || 02/26/2007 9:37 Comments || Top||

#6  our revolution is like a bulldozer ... the enemies think by throwing a few small stones and sand they can stop this bulldozer,”

Easily done, take off the air cleaner and a handfull of sand and small pebbles will ruin a diesel engine. (watch your anologies, this one, is right you CAN stop a bulldozer with a few pebbles)
Posted by: Redneck Jim || 02/26/2007 10:08 Comments || Top||

#7  Tomatos! That's it! Cheney, you magnificent bastard!
Gates, make it so...
Posted by: tu3031 || 02/26/2007 10:20 Comments || Top||

#8  just wait until he hears the futures on hummus. That'll really flip his turban.
Posted by: BA || 02/26/2007 10:27 Comments || Top||

#9  tomatoes, tos, tortillas, sugar, flour, this is the stuff revolutions are made.

See, if the Palis hadn't destroyed the hothouses.......
Posted by: anonymous2u || 02/26/2007 11:39 Comments || Top||

#10  tomatoes..why do they hate us?
Posted by: Mahmoud DinnerJacket || 02/26/2007 13:21 Comments || Top||


Home Front: Culture Wars
Michael Jackson Converting to Islam?
The King Of Pop may be leaving the Kingdom Hall for the Kaaba. Rumors that Michael Jackson may be changing his religion surfaced after his brother, Jermaine Jackson said it is likely that the 48-year old entertainer will convert to Islam. Jermaine said: "I think it is most probable that Michael will convert to Islam."

"When I came back from Mecca I got him a lot of books and he asked me lots of things about my religion and I told him that it's peaceful and beautiful. He read everything and he was proud of me that I found something that would give me inner strength and peace. He could do so much, just like I am trying to do. Michael and I and the word of God, we could do so much."

The recent comments by Jermaine are being taken as breaking news. In reality, Michael's intentions to convert to Islam were reported as far back as November of 2005 in a report released on the website of the Arab-Israeli newspaper, Panorama. The report was based on information elicited from sources in Bahrain. At that time Jackson had officially announced that he had been following the five tenets of Islam and intended to convert to Islam.

Jackson had also announced he was moving to Bahrain and had purchased some real-estate on an artificial island there. Jackson said he intended on moving all his assets and his studio from the U.S. to Bahrain, and had expressed the that he be rid of various legal troubles. His desire was to enjoy the kind of "freedom" he says he does not have in America. The singer said he felt Islam was the closest religion to his personal beliefs.

I would hope that these would not be his personal beliefs. At the time of that same report Jackson was accused of using anti-Semitic language in a phone message to a former business partner. , referring to Jews as leeches. Jackson was heard saying that "they're like leeches...I'm so tired of it...They start out the most popular person in the world, make a lot of money, big house, cars and everything. End up penniless. It is a conspiracy. The Jews do it on purpose." That would explain a few things. The one thing that could move an ardent Jehovah's Witness to become a Muslim is bad feelings about the Jews.

Michael has been staying in Bahrain as a guest of the royal family. Jermaine Jackson converted to Islam in 1989.
Posted by: tipper || 02/26/2007 09:22 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Hey Michael, If you've got to screw up, do it BIG.
Posted by: Redneck Jim || 02/26/2007 9:37 Comments || Top||

#2  His desire was to enjoy the kind of "freedom" he says he does not have in America.

You mean the one he goes on trial for every couple of years?
Posted by: tu3031 || 02/26/2007 9:40 Comments || Top||

#3  Probably. Wait till he discovers it's a one-way conversion. "Or Else". And yes, they really do mean it.
Posted by: Redneck Jim || 02/26/2007 9:56 Comments || Top||

#4  " I told him that it's peaceful and beautiful. "

ROFLMAO JCMTSU


Of course the "freedom" he's looking for is the freedom that allows rich bastards full play of the school yard with no reprecussions. Oh yeah, that and Jew Hatred.
Posted by: AlanC || 02/26/2007 10:10 Comments || Top||

#5  If the curly slipper fits.

Seriously, this is a perfect fit. Playing "victim" only to enrich himself, sleeping with lil' boyz and girlz, extremely mixed up childhood and family life.

If it's good enough for big Mo, who's Jacko to complain?
Posted by: BA || 02/26/2007 10:50 Comments || Top||

#6  Well , may aswell have all the idiots in one basket .. Glad to see the back of him , cos I really cant stand the front .
Posted by: MacNails || 02/26/2007 11:27 Comments || Top||

#7  Given his propensity to "bomb out", he would fit right in. What does Allah say about perverts?
Posted by: Captain America || 02/26/2007 12:12 Comments || Top||

#8  This is a classic case if if the religion fits your vice why not change. He's a freak thats into little boys. Now he can live in a world where children are the sex toys of disturbed adults and women are covered, beaten, burned, murdered, and kept at a safe distance from the men of peace. They are perfect for each other and I wish Islam and Jacko the best! By the way, Jacko was never the king of anything let alone the king of pop!
Posted by: 49 Pan || 02/26/2007 12:22 Comments || Top||

#9  I can see Michael converting to islam. Both he and mohammed liked little boys--buggers.
Posted by: JohnQC || 02/26/2007 12:53 Comments || Top||

#10  Ah, this reminds me of a NSFW joke, don't know if it will survive translation (though it may probably exist in its english version too) : why has michael jackson named his weiner, weener, whatever you spell it, "Truth"? Because the Truth comes out of the mouth of little children.
Posted by: anonymous5089 || 02/26/2007 13:44 Comments || Top||

#11  Michael considered joining back when he thought he was going to prison because he wanted protection. As a Muslim the black Muslims in prison would protect him.

Since he's not going to prison I doubt he'll convert. He'll just live in a pedophile friendly nation.
Posted by: rjschwarz || 02/26/2007 15:38 Comments || Top||

#12  CONTACTMUSIC.com > ISHALLAH > Mikey has indeed converted to Islam - cannnot confirm or deny that he will give up wearing women's clothing while in Yemen.
Posted by: JosephMendiola || 02/26/2007 17:57 Comments || Top||

#13  I for one really enjoyed his music and felt that he had some real talent.
It's been very sad to see him do this downward spiral and weirdness over the years. Not to mention all of his plastic surgery,OMG.
I feel bad for the kids in Bahrain. And of course it's all the jews fault.
Posted by: Jan || 02/26/2007 19:57 Comments || Top||

#14  guess he won't be calling it "jesus juice" any more, eh?
Posted by: Frank G || 02/26/2007 21:16 Comments || Top||

#15  It's been very sad to see him do this downward spiral

Well, there's downward spirals, and then there's Downward Spirals
Posted by: badanov || 02/26/2007 22:32 Comments || Top||

#16 
Q: How does Michael Jackson pick his nose?
A: From a catalog.
Posted by: DMFD || 02/26/2007 22:48 Comments || Top||


Bob Woodruff Returns to ABC News to Report His Story
In his first on-air reporting since being severely injured by a roadside bomb in Iraq last January, ABC News Anchor Bob Woodruff will tell the incredible story of his severe wounding and amazing but painstaking recovery over the past year. Through interviews with the ABC News team and soldiers with him on that fateful patrol, as well as the military and civilian medical teams who saved his life, we learn about Woodruff's journey from the battlefield in Iraq to Germany and finally home to the United States. "To Iraq and back: Bob Woodruff Reports" will air TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 27 (10:00-11:00 p.m., ET) on the ABC Television Network.

In this special primetime documentary, Woodruff's wife, Lee, will talk for the first time about the gravity of her husband's medical condition and the impact on their family.

As part of the special, the Woodruffs return to Bethesda Naval Hospital for the first time since his six-week stay there to visit the doctors, nurses and staff that cared for Bob. From Bethesda, Woodruff reports on the stories of brave young soldiers and Marines who are learning to carry on despite life-altering injuries.
This should be worth a watch. I'd be amazed if Mr. Woodruff is anything but extremely complementary to the US soldiers and medics who helped save his life.
Posted by: Steve White || 02/26/2007 00:00 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  When it happens to servicemen, it's not news. If it happens to One Of Us, then it's worth a special show and lots of commentary.
Posted by: gromky || 02/26/2007 0:53 Comments || Top||

#2  When the Allies occupied Germany, they didn't face RSBs, etc because locals feared retaliation. However, if occupied peoples are colored then occupiers are expected to roll with the punches. The handful-of-extremists' dogma jeopardizes the safety of our troops. Vietnam should have been the last winless-war.
Posted by: Sneaze || 02/26/2007 4:48 Comments || Top||


Alec Baldwin storms out of talk radio interview
Feb. 25
Original Reporting by DanNY
No outside source available yet.

Alec Baldwin, actor and darling of the deranged left, appearing for an interview on the Brian Whitman radio show (WABC NY 77am), stormed out of the studio this evening after Sean Hannity (a centrist talk show host on the same station)called in to ask Alec questions. Mr. Baldwin refused to answer for a time and then, after Mr. Hannity accused him of making irresponsible statements and hiding behind other actors, released a few barbs of his own. Mr. Baldwin accused Mr. Hannity of being "no talent" and suggested he "go back to building houses in Hempstead". Mr. Baldwin then took off his headset, grabbed his jacket and left a half empty diet coke by his seat as he stormed out of the studio.

Both Mr. Hannity and Mr. Baldwin are originally from Long Island. It was not clear whether Mr. Baldwin's reference to Hempstead referred to the Village or Town. If the Village then he appears to be disparaging a large minority population municipality.
Posted by: DanNY || 02/26/2007 00:00 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1 

Baldwin was 30 minutes into a planned two-hour-plus sitdown with WABC Radio's Brian Whitman when Hannity called in.

The fireworks commenced almost immediately.

HANNITY: Alec, I wanted to give you an official WABC welcome considering you were supposed to come on my program last week and you didn't show up. What happened?

BALDWIN: No, I wasn't supposed to come on your program, Sean Hannity.

HANNITY: No, actually you were supposed to come on the program because a deal was made with your agent that if you were going to come on with Brian, first you'd come on with me.

BALDWIN: I wouldn't dream of coming on your program, Sean Hannity. I'm here with Brian. I'm here with a really talented broadcaster.

HANNITY: [Crosstalk] that you are, you don't tell the truth.

BALDWIN: Why would I want to come on the show with a no-talent, former construction worker hack like you?

HANNITY: Are you the guy that said of our vice president, while we're at war, while we're leading troops in harm's way - are you the reckless, third-rate Hollywood actor who said that Dick Cheney is a terrorist? Are you the guy . . .

BALDWIN: Yes I am.

HANNITY: ... who said to stone Henry Hyde to death? Are you the guy who said our president is a CIA mass murderer? I wanted you to come on the program and defend that, you gutless coward.

BALDWIN: At first I thought this was a joke. But you can hear all the acid venom spewing hatred. It is Sean Hannity. [END EXCERPT]

The exchange got even hotter when Mark Levin joined in.

LEVIN: We've only just begun - are you 40 or 50 pounds overweight now?

WHITMAN: Oh, C'mon now . . . .

HANNITY: Once and for all you need to be challenged. You want to call our vice president a terrorist - fine. You want to talk about stoning people to death, say it on my program. If you want to be irresponsible and call our president a mass murderer while he's at war leading troops in harm's way ...

BALDWIN: And what are you gonna do about it, Sean Hannity?

HANNITY: You don't have the courage to answer questions.

BALDWIN: And what are you gonna do? And what are you going to do about it, Sean Hannity. If I come on your program, what are you going to do?

LEVIN: He's going to show that you have a two digit IQ - that's what he's gonna do.

BALWIN: What are you going to do?

LEVIN: I just told you - you've got a two digit IQ.

BALDWIN: And who's that - who's your little cabin boy there with you.

LEVIN: I'm not a cabin boy, butt-boy.

BALDWIN: What are you doing there, cabin boy? ... I now dub you Sean Hannity's cabin boy.

LEVIN: And you know what you are? You're "Brokeback" Alec. [END EXCERPT]

The confrontation continued to spiral out of control, with Whitman intermittently trying to make peace and Baldwin repeatedly urging him to move on to other callers.

BALDWIN: Listen, Sean - you incredibly ignorant boob from Long Island ...

HANNITY: Oh, ouch, Alec.

BALDWIN: No, no, no, you've spoken, let me talk, Sean. Cause you've been spewing your ...

HANNITY: You're a third-rate Hollywood egomaniac.

BALDWIN: You're a no-talent, ignorant fool from Long Island. You should go back to building houses in Hempstead.

LEVIN: Why was your [former] wife [Kim Basinger] so pissed off at you, anyway?

WHITMAN: Now, c'mon guys.

BALDWIN: OK. We're done. [Gets up and leaves the studio]

WHITMAN: Come back. Come back. Alec? They're gone. Alec? Alec has walked out of the studio. Alec, please come back.
Posted by: Angenter Crolugum3645 || 02/26/2007 0:33 Comments || Top||

#2 
Posted by: Angenter Crolugum3645 || 02/26/2007 0:42 Comments || Top||

#3  This *really* needs a 'no drinking' alert!

Oh wow - I wish I'd heard that...
Posted by: Tony (UK) || 02/26/2007 2:06 Comments || Top||

#4  Didn't Alec promise to Leave USA if Bush wins second term?
Posted by: gromgoru || 02/26/2007 3:00 Comments || Top||

#5  Why would I want to come on the show with a no-talent, former construction worker hack like you?

Iteresting insight on how the Left really feels about the laboring masses.
Posted by: gromgoru || 02/26/2007 3:02 Comments || Top||

#6  Yes, in my circles, it's considered an achievement if a man, formerly of humble origins, rises above his birth status due to natural merit. To Alec Baldwin, the fact that Hannity was a manual laborer is contemptible and unforgivable. This is more a rich prick thing than it is a right-left thing, but when lefties do it it's hypocrisy.
Posted by: gromky || 02/26/2007 5:11 Comments || Top||

#7  Actually, Baldwin is useful because his tantrums cause people to take politicized-actors less seriously. He's not a bad actor. I saw him in an excellent TV remake of "Judgment at Nuremberg."
Posted by: Sneaze || 02/26/2007 5:14 Comments || Top||

#8  Sorry Sneaze, since I saw Mr Baldwin in 'Team America', whatever he does from now on is mere sidewalk entertainment. He truly attained his zenith in that film.
Posted by: Tony (UK) || 02/26/2007 5:36 Comments || Top||

#9  He's going to show that you have a two digit IQ - that's what he's gonna do.


As they say in the trade , OWNED .
Posted by: MacNails || 02/26/2007 6:33 Comments || Top||

#10  I liked him in Hunt for Red October, but that was before his zenith in Team America.
Posted by: Bobby || 02/26/2007 6:41 Comments || Top||

#11  A name actor is only as saleable as the love he generates in his potential audience before they pay to see his latest opus. Talent and charisma are piece of that, but doing all the stupid red carpet interviews and Jay Leno thingies are a big part, too. Mr. Baldwin had better hope Americans really are as forgetful of history as is claimed... and that Jay Leno, et al don't find this amusing and topical enough to riff on, the way they did Mr. Gore's conferences being cancelled annually due to wintry weather.
Posted by: trailing wife || 02/26/2007 6:55 Comments || Top||

#12  I love seeing the left wingers get in tizzies. You really see their thinking and how they view people.
I still will not see anything with Alex in it.
Posted by: DarthVader || 02/26/2007 7:18 Comments || Top||

#13  Diet-Coke: Why does Alec hate it?
Posted by: Excalibur || 02/26/2007 9:06 Comments || Top||

#14  This happened once before between Alec Baldwin and Sean Hannity. I can't believe Baldwin went back to the construction worker crack a second time.
Posted by: eLarson || 02/26/2007 10:36 Comments || Top||

#15  I was about to say, eLarson, Hannity has used Baldwin's quote about a two-bit, no talent construction worker before. Is this a repeat?
Posted by: BA || 02/26/2007 10:37 Comments || Top||

#16  Just goes to show you how elitist the Hollywood left really is--they think they are superior to construction workers, the military, and just about everyone else that works for a living. The most significant thing Balwin ever did way marry Kim Basinger. It was downhill after that.
Posted by: JohnQC || 02/26/2007 12:09 Comments || Top||

#17  this exchange was on several months ago..it must have been a re-broadcast..
Posted by: RD || 02/26/2007 13:18 Comments || Top||

#18  This sounds like Deja Vu all over again.
Posted by: doc || 02/26/2007 18:04 Comments || Top||

#19  I wonder how many liberal construction workers are aware of Baldwin's comments.
Maybe we can use this to an advantage.
This hollywood led agenda is getting a bit much
Posted by: Jan || 02/26/2007 19:48 Comments || Top||



Who's in the News
102[untagged]

Bookmark
E-Mail Me

The Classics
The O Club
Rantburg Store
The Bloids
The Never-ending Story
Thugburg
Gulf War I
The Way We Were
Bio

Merry-Go-Blog











On Sale now!


A multi-volume chronology and reference guide set detailing three years of the Mexican Drug War between 2010 and 2012.

Rantburg.com and borderlandbeat.com correspondent and author Chris Covert presents his first non-fiction work detailing the drug and gang related violence in Mexico.

Chris gives us Mexican press dispatches of drug and gang war violence over three years, presented in a multi volume set intended to chronicle the death, violence and mayhem which has dominated Mexico for six years.
Click here for more information

Meet the Mods
In no particular order...
Steve White
Seafarious
tu3031
badanov
sherry
ryuge
GolfBravoUSMC
Bright Pebbles
trailing wife
Gloria
Fred
Besoeker
Glenmore
Frank G
3dc
Skidmark

Two weeks of WOT
Mon 2007-02-26
  3 French nationals murdered in Soddy ministry
Sun 2007-02-25
  Boomer tries for Abdul Aziz al-Hakim
Sat 2007-02-24
  3 Pak bad boyz dead when their package blows up
Fri 2007-02-23
  U.S. bangs five bad boyz in Iraq gunfight
Thu 2007-02-22
  Another poison gas attack in Iraq
Wed 2007-02-21
  Brits to begin withdrawing troops
Tue 2007-02-20
  USS Stennis Now On Station
Mon 2007-02-19
  64 killed in Delhi-Lahore train boom
Sun 2007-02-18
  Iraqi, Coalition forces detain 21 suspected terrs
Sat 2007-02-17
  Algeria: Police kill 26 bad boyz, arrest 35 after attacks
Fri 2007-02-16
  Attempt to hijack Maretanian plane painfully foiled
Thu 2007-02-15
  Al-Masri said wounded, aide killed
Wed 2007-02-14
  Bombs kill nine on buses in Lebanon
Tue 2007-02-13
  Tater bugs out
Mon 2007-02-12
  140 arrested in Baghdad sweeps: US military

Better than the average link...



Rantburg was assembled from recycled algorithms in the United States of America. No trees were destroyed in the production of this weblog. We did hurt some, though. Sorry.
3.235.140.73
Help keep the Burg running! Paypal:
WoT Operations (23)    Non-WoT (22)    Opinion (11)    Local News (8)    (0)