#1
Isn't it interesting that Bambi's Columbia paper bubbles up as he sits in Moscow? It's almost as if someone has awoken to the fact that he wants to negotiate a radical, unsustainable disarmament plan.
Posted by: Steve White ||
07/06/2009 15:29 Comments ||
Top||
#2
But then, there are some things we shouldn't have to live through in order to want to avoid the experience.
Little did Barry know that these sage words would oneday be self-applicable.
A very long piece from "reclusive Feminist," a liberal who seems to see things very clearly.
...it has not escaped my attention that many of the things Palin is accused of, falsely, are actually true of Obama. This is a guy who, as a U.S. senator from Illinois, didn't even know which Senate committees he was on or which states bordered his own. (And don't even get me started on Joe "The Talking Donkey" Biden, who thinks FDR was president during the stock market crash and that people watched TV in those days.) I'm not saying Obama's a moron, but he's sure as hell no genius. People say Sarah Palin rambles; excuse me, but have you actually heard Obama speak extemporaneously? As for being a diva, surely we all remember the Possomus sign and the special embroidered pillow on the Obama campaign plane. The fact is, Obama is an intellectually mediocre narcissist with a thin resume who's lost without a teleprompter and whose entire campaign had all the substance and gravity of a Pepsi commercial. Yet people say Sarah Palin is a fluffy bunny diva.
So: are we back to Obama after all? Is this a transference thing? Are people subconsciously frustrated by the fact that Obama is an empty suit, and are they transferring that rage to Palin? Go read it all; it's worth your time.
Posted by: Mike ||
07/06/2009 07:58 ||
Comments ||
Link ||
[3 views]
Top|| File under:
#1
It's one thing to get all this PDS--including knowing lies--from dems and libs. It's another, according to the reclusive feminist, to have them coming down drenched in boiling acid from feminists.
The post and the comments explore the possible reasons.
Can't say they're all right. The patriarchy is blamed without consideration for all the men who voted for and otherwise support Palin. But it's the bad menz who made the women so vicious. Figures.
Posted by: Richard Aubrey ||
07/06/2009 8:22 Comments ||
Top||
#2
Very excellent post. I loved the term ..."Godbag."
A godbag is a bag full of hate and self-loathing wearing stage makeup that makes it look like a televangelist.
1. Not elite, and therefore unfit to lead anyone in a democracy.
2. Fertile, which threatens sterile feminists.
3. Has a handsome husband, which also threatens them.
4. It's all projection of unacceptable thoughts onto the "other".
A great piece, it's heartening to see liberals sit up and say, "hey, maybe it's not a good idea to call Palin a cunt." Only a few of them, but it's a start.
#8
A. Born into noble family.
B. Admitted to elite school on basis of ability; expected to renounce humble past and become One Of Us.
If you're not an elite, then by what means do you claim the power to govern? You're no more than an ordinary citizen, a beast to be herded really. Moreover, it lessens the accomplishments of the elite, because if anyone can do it, then what was the point of learning the secret handshake?
#9
What the feminists don't verbalize is that even they consider blacks to outrank them in the grievance list. No matter how bad women had it it was mostly a cake-walk compared to slavery. When it came up to a choice between a woman and a black man there was no comparison (ask Hillary).
When the woman was of a different political affiliation they assaulted her for forcing them to confront there own emotions on the issue.
#10
red. Don't even try to explain. "mense" is periodic, ahem.
The reference to the bad menz is permanent. The bad menz are responsible for all bad things, including making the strong, independent, deep-thinking feminists savage Palin with misogynist slanders because said strong, independent deep-thinking feminists are brainwashed by the Patriarchy, which is made up of bad menz.
Posted by: Richard Aubrey ||
07/06/2009 14:15 Comments ||
Top||
#11
"The bad menz are responsible for all bad things, including making the strong, independent, deep-thinking feminists savage Palin with misogynist slanders because said strong, independent deep-thinking feminists are brainwashed by the Patriarchy, which is made up of bad menz..." I used to think rather a lot of John McCain - but after how he and his staff hung her out to dry, I'm afraid I think considerably less of him.
About the most sensible deconstruction I've seen yet...
Seriously, the attacks on SP from the old-line feminists were just absolutely insane ... and yest, there is a great deal of transference about it. All the most awful things of which she was accused, over and over and over, and yet one more time again ... they were all debunked, over and over and over, and yet they still kept coming up, more persistent than Freddy Kruger.
Here in the heart of flyover America, I didn't talk to a woman after she was picked for VP who didn't think she was a great pick, and an amazing and inspiring person. At a Tea Party planning meeting, when we had a a visit from a guy whose claim to fame was that he had written about Joe the Plumber, the instant he said that he had traveled with the McCain campaign, the first words out of the mouths of the other three women on the committee was "Did you meet Sarah Palin?!"
#1
Friday announcements are supposed to pass by the press, evading close scrutiny. Not this one! She beat Michael Jackson's ongoing death extravaganza and even some of the Fourth of July events. What a woman! And she managed to catch everyone by surprise. Not many can accomplish that these days.
Posted by: Richard of Oregon ||
07/06/2009 8:06 Comments ||
Top||
#2
She's out there donks, and she's coming after YOU! All of YOU!
#3
Leave it to Rush to state the obvious part that everyone else either missed or willfully ignored: we don't know why she did it.
She hasn't told us. She knows why and she'll explain it in time.
But today it's all speculation on our part.
Instapundit has suggested that it's part of a move to grab hold of the Tea Party. Maybe, but third parties typically don't do well. Others have suggested that she'll work to change the Pubs from within just as Reagan did in the 1970s. Still others say that she's going to go the talk show route.
We don't know. But she's going to show us. And it's going to be interesting.
Posted by: Steve White ||
07/06/2009 9:23 Comments ||
Top||
#4
It may be too little, too late. Obamageddon is upon us.
A multi-volume chronology and reference guide set detailing three years of the Mexican Drug War between 2010 and 2012.
Rantburg.com and borderlandbeat.com correspondent and author Chris Covert presents his first non-fiction work detailing
the drug and gang related violence in Mexico.
Chris gives us Mexican press dispatches of drug and gang war violence
over three years, presented in a multi volume set intended to chronicle the death, violence and mayhem which has
dominated Mexico for six years.
Rantburg was assembled from recycled algorithms in the United States of America. No
trees were destroyed in the production of this weblog. We did hurt some, though. Sorry.
