[Breitbart] Typing "kill" into Twitter’s search function currently returns a shocking result at the top of its search suggestions: "#KillKavanaugh." It’s also currently the third autocompleted suggestion in searches for "ki" and the fourth suggestion in searches for "k" as of this writing.
That’s right ‐ by typing a single letter into search, Twitter is suggesting that its users might be interested in a hashtag about the murder of a federal judge and SCOTUS nominee.
The search suggestion was spotted by Instapundit earlier today and has been confirmed by Breitbart News.
#2
Well, the Dems and their Antifa/Screaming Harpy International Team (S.H.I.T.)(tm) have already shown themselves to be in revolt against the legal government and Constitution of the US. 600,000 casualties the last time the Dems tried this. How many this time?
#3
How did Twitter algorithm's know that "Ki" wasn't the beginning of "Kiss" or "Kindest for" or "Kindlier" or "Kibitzer?" unless the AI was programmed to do this? How about kill the AI? Other words that begin with "Ki." There are many.
[FOX] Obama-era Attorney General Eric Holder reacted to the confirmation of Judge Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court Saturday by questioning the legitimacy of the court and arguing that it needed to regain the nation's trust.
Holder -- who served as the nation’s top lawyer under former President Barack Obama from 2009 to 2015 -- said the treatment of former Supreme Court nominee Merrick Garland by Senate Republicans, as well as Kavanaugh’s confirmation, meant the legitimacy of the court was in question.
"With the confirmation of Kavanaugh and the process which led to it, (and the treatment of Merrick Garland), the legitimacy of the Supreme Court can justifiably be questioned," he tweeted. "The Court must now prove - through its work - that it is worthy of the nation’s trust."
#9
At least he speaks much more than Sessions. Now that Trump has the Supremes ïn his corner and the pubs p/o'ed at the Dims, he should start saying, "You're Fired!" to some key dead beats and cut throats.
[Hot Air] It seems as if the battle over Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation is getting under everyone’s skin and, in some cases, putting them off their game. This may be particularly true of New Jersey Senator (and frequently mentioned presidential hopeful) Cory Booker. He was on Don Lemon’s show on CNN on Thursday, expressing his opposition to Kavanaugh, which is nothing new or surprising. But in order to make his case and prove how opposing the judge’s confirmation was a mainstream idea, he decided to cite the editorial board of the Washington Post. (The WaPo formally opposed Kavanaugh’s confirmation.) The problem is that Booker appeared to be swept up in the moment and spoke a bit more truth than he probably intended.
I suppose we should applaud Booker for his moment of honesty, but his advisers have probably had a word with him about this already. Um, Senator? You’re not supposed to say that out loud...
#2
I am not an ass clown. I am not an ass clown. I am not an ass clown. I am not an ass clown. I am not an ass clown. I am not an ass clown. I am not an.....
[Instapundit] Again and again, President Trump was instructed not to do it. A cadre of advisers, confidants and lawmakers all urged him ‐ implored him, really ‐ not to personally attack the women who had accused Supreme Court nominee Brett M. Kavanaugh of sexual assault.
So he did it anyway.
Addressing thousands at a boisterous rally in Mississippi, Trump relied on his own visceral sense of the moment and mocked Christine Blasey Ford for gaps in her memory, directly impugning the accuser’s credibility.
Establishment Republicans initially reacted with horror. But Trump’s 36-second off-script jeremiad proved a key turning point toward victory for the polarizing nominee, White House officials and Kavanaugh allies said, turbocharging momentum behind Kavanaugh just as his fate appeared most in doubt. . . .
"How did you get home? ’I don’t remember,’ " Trump said, reenacting Ford’s hearing. "How did you get there? ’I don’t remember.’ Where is the place? ’I don’t remember.’ How many years ago was it? ’I don’t know. I don’t know. I don’t know.’ "
The riff lasted less than a minute, but had lasting ramifications. The senators whose votes Kavanaugh was wooing said they were aghast at the president’s rally-stage behavior. But Kavanaugh allies saw a clear benefit: An argument by the president that bucked up Kavanaugh, discredited Ford and became a clarion call for conservatives.
More than two dozen Trump supporters interviewed at the president’s campaign rally Thursday in Minnesota said they wish he had not gone after Ford, fretting that doing so was not presidential. Yet many also acknowledged the president had simply spoken aloud what many of them thought privately.
Everybody knew her story was bunk, but ‐ since she was a white, upper-class, professional, liberal woman ‐ everyone said she was "credible." But she wasn’t, and only Trump was willing to say it. Once he did, well. . . .
A cadre of advisers, confidants and lawmakers need to reassess their position in society. Particularly those who are no better than sock puppets for the Donk LSM.
#5
I give great credit to his team building abilities. Just look at this picks; Bolton, Mattis, Kelly, Pompeo, Jay Seculow, Munchen, Kelleyanne Conway, Carson, Ross, and others.
I'm very happy with the results. If they could have been achieved without omarosa and Bannon I'd be even happier. And did George Conway actually keep his mouth shut during the Kavanaugh hearings or was I just lucky enough to be doing something important when he said something stupid?
Posted by: M. Murcek ||
10/07/2018 9:16 Comments ||
Top||
#8
More to come. Trump is doing the work that has needed to be done for years. Trump and Giuliani are a dynamic duo. People can't keep up with them. So with these two I can see much more to come. The media is lost. The Democrat is lost. "Lets get ready to rumble". America first. American people first.
Why are they lost?. They do things politically. Reality is a dear teacher if they able to learn, which I doubt.
#9
DJT makes the decisions of a good GM in (pick your sport). He won't hit on 100% but he'll hit a good average. Also, he doesn't seem to let perfect get in the way of good enough.
#10
Reminds of what Jesse says in Breaking Bad about Mr White, 'He's smarter than you, he's luckier than you, and whatever it is you think is going to happen the exact opposite is going to happen.'
I agree! She is now 'illegitimate' and must quickly resign from the court.
[Townhall] During a talk at Princeton University on Friday, Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan expressed deep concern over the legitimacy of the Court after Justice Anthony Kennedy retired. Kagan is concerned that the "middle position" ‐ also known as the unpredictable vote ‐ is now gone and Kennedy could be replaced with someone (Judge Brett Kavanaugh) whose views fall more on the conservative spectrum.
Kagan explained that Kennedy and Sandra Day O'Connor did something important for the Court: they made it look "impartial and neutral and fair."
"Part of the Court's strength and part of the Court's legitimacy depends on people not seeing the Court in the way that people see the other governing structures of this country now," Kagan explained. "In other words, people thinking of the Court as not politically divided in the same ways. It's not an extension of politics, but instead somehow above the fray."
Kagan believes it's important for the Court to uphold that integrity, especially because we live in a deeply divided political climate.
"In the last, really 30 years, starting with Justice O'Connor and continuing with Justice Kennedy, there has been a person who found the center or people couldn't predict in that sort of way. That enabled the court to look as though it was not owned by one side or another and was indeed impartial and neutral and fair," Kagan said. "It's not so clear going forward. That sort of middle position, you know, it's not so clear whether we'll have it."
#4
...and Kennedy could be replaced with someone (Judge Brett Kavanaugh) whose views fall more on the conservative spectrum.
You mean has been replaced. And if your goon squads didn't go after Kavanaugh like you did, there would have been a chance that would still be the case. Instead, you'll get someone as far to the right as Clarence Thomas, if not more so, and for the same reason, for at least thirty years.
#6
The problem with that is Congress is not filled with Trumps; that's why it won't happen. That said, I'm happy with the small brass balls that the Senate GOP developed over the past few weeks. Grassley gets the big pair out of the bunch.
#8
Kagan was the Dean at Harvard Law School who hired Kavanaugh to teach 100s of law students during the past 11 years. Now, she questions whether he should be on SCOTUS for political reasons? Where's the blind lady of justice? Damned leftist idealogues!
#11
I believe Kagan has just made the basis of recusal to any Trump cases before the court. Throw in Ginsberg's comments during the election, that's two recusals. Now let's talk about 'legitimacy' if you don't.
#12
I would argue that it may be legitimate now that Kavanaugh is appointed. But only time will tell. The court should have been leaning conservative for years yet seemingly conservative judges actually leaned left. If Kagan wants a middle of the road justice then she is more than welcome to fill that role.
#14
Ya know, I'm beginning to think whether I've been right to oppose this "living Constitution" bullshit all these years. See my forthcoming article, "Penumbras of the Second Amendment: The M1A2 Abrams As A Militia Weapon".
Posted by: Matt ||
10/07/2018 7:48 Comments ||
Top||
A multi-volume chronology and reference guide set detailing three years of the Mexican Drug War between 2010 and 2012.
Rantburg.com and borderlandbeat.com correspondent and author Chris Covert presents his first non-fiction work detailing
the drug and gang related violence in Mexico.
Chris gives us Mexican press dispatches of drug and gang war violence
over three years, presented in a multi volume set intended to chronicle the death, violence and mayhem which has
dominated Mexico for six years.
Rantburg was assembled from recycled algorithms in the United States of America. No
trees were destroyed in the production of this weblog. We did hurt some, though. Sorry.
[FOX] Obama-era Attorney General Eric Holder reacted to the confirmation of Judge Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court Saturday by questioning the legitimacy of the court and arguing that it needed to regain the nation's trust.
[Hot Air] It seems as if the battle over Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation is getting under everyone’s skin and, in some cases, putting them off their game. This may be particularly true of New Jersey Senator (and frequently mentioned presidential hopeful) Cory Booker. He was on Don Lemon’s show on CNN on Thursday, expressing his opposition to Kavanaugh, which is nothing new or surprising. But in order to make his case and prove how opposing the judge’s confirmation was a mainstream idea, he decided to cite the editorial board of the Washington Post. (The WaPo formally opposed Kavanaugh’s confirmation.) The problem is that Booker appeared to be swept up in the moment and spoke a bit more truth than he probably intended. 
