Archived material Access restricted Article

Today's Front Page   View All of Wed 01/27/2021 View Tue 01/26/2021 View Mon 01/25/2021 View Sun 01/24/2021 View Sat 01/23/2021 View Fri 01/22/2021 View Thu 01/21/2021
2021-01-27 Home Front: Politix
Virginia Rule Allowing Late Ballots Missing Postmark Was Illegal, Court Rules
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Besoeker 2021-01-27 05:11|| E-Mail|| Front Page|| [10832 views ]  Top

#1 The Constitution is clear. It is the legislatures that determine the method of selecting electors, not the executive nor the judiciary.
Posted by Procopius2k  2021-01-27 06:27||   2021-01-27 06:27|| Front Page Top

#2 A lot of bloody good this does now.
Posted by Raj 2021-01-27 07:41||   2021-01-27 07:41|| Front Page Top

#3 Why do people on the left (Donks, Rinos, and DP) want to shut off any questions regarding election fraud? Biden's installment into the Presidency had about 100 attendees and 25-30,000 National Guard. He never had more than a handful of people attend the few rallies he had.

Maybe it's time to have a forensic audit on the ballots and returns from all of the states.

Was he really honestly elected?
Posted by JohnQC 2021-01-27 07:45||   2021-01-27 07:45|| Front Page Top

#4 /\ China Joe ran a notional campaign. There was no need for a full-blown campaign effort. They already had it in the bag and they knew it.
Posted by Besoeker 2021-01-27 07:49||   2021-01-27 07:49|| Front Page Top

#5 This is a follow up.

Back in late Oct 2020, PILF got an injunction and late ballots w/o postmarks were not counted in the Nov 2020 VA election.

This next ruling makes the injunction permanent.

In any event the number of ballots in question is not particularly great. According to the USPS, fewer than 200,000 ballots nationwide were received after Nov 3, the vast majority of them with legible postmarks.

There are other issues with voting by mail, mainly the issue of identity. In Virginia, the application for a mail ballot required the last 4 of the voter's SSN and the security envelop with the ballot required the same. The Commonwealth stated that for all mail in ballots, the SSN on the application was matched with the SSN on the ballot. This was not as tight as in person voting which, in Virginia, required an actual ID, but it should have prevented large scale fraud.
Posted by Lord Garth 2021-01-27 08:37||   2021-01-27 08:37|| Front Page Top

#6 The local rag has the deets about Judge William Warner Eldridge IV. A former defense attorney, he was elevated to “Hizzoner” in 2015 when his predecessor stepped down for health reasons.
Posted by trailing wife 2021-01-27 09:05||   2021-01-27 09:05|| Front Page Top

#7 the rule of law hasn't won yet. this will go through the legal process, hopefully all the way to the SC so that it's binding across the board.
Posted by Herb Big Foot2665 2021-01-27 10:14||   2021-01-27 10:14|| Front Page Top

#8 Welcome Instapundit readers!
Posted by Steve White 2021-01-27 10:40||   2021-01-27 10:40|| Front Page Top

#9 going forward a good change to make for voting by mail would be to require both the last 4 SSN and also the driver's license (or State ID).

The SSN is needed because non citizens can only get a SSN with an approval from DHS.

The Driver's license is needed because the DL is linked to a home address in the State where the vote is cast and thus can be verified more easily.

Even with this augment there will be some fraud, e.g., people voting for recently deceased relatives, people voting by taking info from residents of long term facilities, people voting who have recently moved and still have their old driver's license and so forth. But the duel ID requirement for mail voting ought to decrease the fraud by a significant amount.
Posted by Lord Garth 2021-01-27 10:56||   2021-01-27 10:56|| Front Page Top

#10 Lord Garth, But the duel ID requirement for mail voting ought to decrease the fraud by a significant amount.
Decreasing the fraud by any amount is exactly what the Dems don't want
Posted by Rambler in Virginia 2021-01-27 11:30||   2021-01-27 11:30|| Front Page Top


OK !!!!!VA has a ruling.
But likely there is NO way to UN-COUNT the illegally allowed Ballots and UPDATE the election with the CORRECTED vote totals is there???

Posted by NN2N1 2021-01-27 11:37||   2021-01-27 11:37|| Front Page Top

#12 If no recount, thow the whole thing out. Redo, new military rules, like we do in 3rd world s-holes.
Posted by Spavins Panda2219 2021-01-27 13:22||   2021-01-27 13:22|| Front Page Top

#13 to #5 ... the fraud commes when the 'machine' rejects a ballot and sends it to a person or program that decides what the voter meant to markk. and then marks it accordingly. FFraud also occurs when ballots 'mysteriously' appear and miraculouly change a total. There were some msm programs where the live total mysteriously changed from 75% to 71% suddenly increasing the number od voters i a district.
Posted by irish rage boy  2021-01-27 13:56||   2021-01-27 13:56|| Front Page Top

#14 @#11. They could reject next day jump drive ballot harvesting for Jennifer Wexton and Abigail Spanberger; but they won’t.
Posted by Airandee 2021-01-27 14:08||   2021-01-27 14:08|| Front Page Top

23:55 Deacon Blues
22:52 Rambler in Virginia
22:46 Cromoger Poodle3181
22:33 Big Craish6553
22:19 Cromoger Poodle3181
22:10 Ebbeng Lover of the Boskonians1752
21:40 Clem
21:39 Clem
21:32 trailing wife
21:22 Blackbeard Barnsmell6454
21:19 Blackbeard Barnsmell6454
20:53 Anomalous Sources
20:29 Anomalous Sources
20:05 trailing wife
20:03 European Conservative
19:35 Glenmore
19:34 Blackbeard Barnsmell6454
19:30 Frank G
19:28 Frank G
19:07 Zebulon Phose8282
18:50 swksvolFF
18:49 European Conservative
18:47 CrazyFool
18:45 CrazyFool

Search WWW Search