Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Sat 02/24/2007 View Fri 02/23/2007 View Thu 02/22/2007 View Wed 02/21/2007 View Tue 02/20/2007 View Mon 02/19/2007 View Sun 02/18/2007
1
2007-02-24 Home Front: WoT
Watada Charged Again
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Steve White 2007-02-24 00:00|| || Front Page|| [5 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 He won't > "War crimes" is a specific act(s), which Mr. Watada could not have witnessed or be participatory/accessory/accomplice to becuz he refused to physically deploy wid his unit; + any and all Enlisted and Commissioned are told the National Security = Needs of the USA-USDOD-Armed Service(s) comes first, and is made understood to sign BINDING OATHS to that effect.
Posted by JosephMendiola 2007-02-24 00:12||   2007-02-24 00:12|| Front Page Top

#2 now Ima concerned. Joe made total sense to me
Posted by Frank G">Frank G  2007-02-24 07:28||   2007-02-24 07:28|| Front Page Top

#3 1) After a mistrial, re-issuing the same charges is not "double jeopardy". A mistrial isn't an acquittal; it's a declaration that the trial has to be done over, and the state has the option not to pursue a second trial.

2) How can someone who was never in Iraq know anything about "war crimes" in Iraq?

The little bastard joined after the invasion of Iraq; he knew what he was getting into. Throw him into prison, throw away the key, and encase his cell in concrete.
Posted by Rob Crawford">Rob Crawford  2007-02-24 09:31|| http://www.kloognome.com/]">[http://www.kloognome.com/]  2007-02-24 09:31|| Front Page Top

#4 RC, it came a shock to me too, but double jeopardy isn't as clear-cut as you'd expect. I'm still looking into the precise point when jeopardy attaches, but so far I actually think the defense can make a straight-faced argument. Insane, I know.
Posted by exJAG 2007-02-24 13:22||   2007-02-24 13:22|| Front Page Top

#5 So do we get a new judge? This wasn't in yesterday's Seattle papers as of 3 PM, welcome news. I haven't turned on the TV today, but I imagine the Seattle lefties are seething.
Posted by USN, ret. 2007-02-24 20:45||   2007-02-24 20:45|| Front Page Top

23:56 Darkydark
23:52 Sic_Semper_Tyrannus
23:46 Mike N.
23:21 RD
23:21 Thrump Snairong6534
23:18 RD
23:08 49 Pan
23:08 RD
23:04 Captain America
22:52 3dc
22:52 IG-88
22:51 RD
22:49 SR-71
22:44 Chiper Threreger8956
22:40 SR-71
22:32 Thrump Snairong6534
22:30 Chiper Threreger8956
22:26 Chiper Threreger8956
22:18 Redneck Jim
22:18 Sic_Semper_Tyrannus
22:16 Procopius2k
22:11 JohnQC
22:06 Procopius2k
22:02 Sic_Semper_Tyrannus









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com