Article

2003-03-28 India-Pakistan

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Paul Moloney 2003-03-28 09:59 am|| || Front Page|| [11129 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 Yesterday, it was the supreme religious leader of Syria. Two days before that the JUI of Pakistan did the same. From minbars (pulpits) and schools all over the world and in your neighborhood, Muslims are inciting violence against non-believers (kaffirs). On Dec. 22, 2002, the fatwah committee of al-Azhar University (Cairo, the highest religious authority of Muslims
ordered the production of weapons of mass destruction for use by Muslims. And large numbers of these mortal enemies are pouring into the democracies. An Australian government website proclaims a 161% increase in Muslims in the past 10 years. In city after city in America, extremist and genocidal Salafi mosques are arising, aided and abetted by supporters of President Bush's "faith based" regime.

How are we replying to this aggression? Logic dictates that nuclear blackmail, annihilation of Islamofascists and forced occupation, are the only effective means to pacify Iraq, etc. Bush/Blair are talking about months and months of unnecessary deaths of the finest soldiers in Western civilization. Bush said that the counter-terror war could take "10 years" while Cheney revised this to "50." Now that there is battlefield proof of Iraq's preparations and plans to use WMD, we are still attacking these animals on a piecemeal basis. American commanders, such as Captain Waldron (3-Div) are openly protesting rules of engagement that jeopardize the lives of troops. Even after Baghdad is occupied by costly, limited-war means, occupying troops will still have to face a bloody intifada carried out by protected Fedayen. Everybody saw those Umm Qasr civilians cheer Saddam Hussein, even as they took food from a relief convoy. This "hearts and minds" indulgence is becoming a spectacle.

Only a wholesale effort, which takes the sail out of "heroic jihad" propaganda, will eliminate this genocidal enemy. We de-nazified Germany. The entire globe needs to be de-Islamofascied at the earliest opportunity, and by the least costly means. Bush's alienation of China, Russia and India - all of which face jihadi insurgencies - has to be reversed, and the common enemy of civilization must be annihilated. (Don't point the finger at Russia. Bush chose to ally with the terror state of Pakistan, which supplies the Chechen jihadis)

One more month of Fedayen sniping from housing complexes followed by laughable Coalition consultation with DOD lawyers on a legal response, will produce the type of frustration that will cause free peoples to cheapen the lives of those human-cockroaches. Solemn declarations concerning imaginary Western "values" that supposedly indulge Salafi genocidism, are going to sound very hollow in the next few weeks. Kill or be killed.

Posted by Anonon 2003-03-28 02:57:45|| 2003-03-28 02:57:45|| Front Page Top

#2 Boy is about due for a 44.cal enema.

Posted by raptor 2003-03-28 05:56:43|| 2003-03-28 05:56:43|| Front Page Top

#3 I'm not quite ready to make the declaration that anonon did, but my thoughts are certainly heading in that direction. If the "majority" (as we are told time and time again) of Muslims are peaceful and respectful of others, why have we not witnessed an outcry against terrorism by those Muslims in positions of authority?

One standard answer I've been given is that they are afraid of "reprisals". Forgive me if I find that logic less than compelling--the idea that a religion of "peace and tolerance" must roll over and play dead so that it can be corrupted and kidnapped by those who would use it for violence is an abdication of one's responsibility.

Muslims, you have only a few short years to speak up, act, and regain control of your religion from those who have perverted it for violent means before even those of us who like to think of ourselves as "reasonable" decide that your adherants must be dealt with by force on a global scale. It is not the Anglos who have declared "jihad"--it is also not OUR responsibility to REBUKE it. That job belongs to those of the Muslim faith who truly believe in peace and tolerance.

Posted by Flaming Sword 2003-03-28 10:47:38|| 2003-03-28 10:47:38|| Front Page Top

#4 Flaming Sword:
Hundreds of reported exhortations to jihad, issued from mosques, should have caused you to doubt "hijack" theory. If you read al-Faraj's book - THE NEGLECTED DUTY - on jihad-conscription obligations of all Muslims, you wouldn't restrict finger-pointing to al-Qaeda and company.

Posted by Anonon 2003-03-28 11:14:12|| 2003-03-28 11:14:12|| Front Page Top

#5 "I kept on cutting his throat until he died. My commander was very happy with me. He kissed my forehead and I became his blue-eyed boy." Since being blue-eyed is definitely a western trait, does that mean he became an infidel? It's a strange world we live in.

Posted by charlotte 2003-03-28 12:02:19|| 2003-03-28 12:02:19|| Front Page Top

#6 I'll bet he was his brown eye boy, too.

Posted by tu3031 2003-03-28 16:36:38|| 2003-03-28 16:36:38|| Front Page Top

06:07 Eleanor
12:00 True American
08:24 raptor
18:09 Phate
08:11 raptor
08:09 raptor
07:56 raptor
07:38 raptor
02:38 anon1
02:00 Brew
01:59 Dishman
01:48 Brew
01:44 Brew
01:31 mojo
01:29 Brew
01:23 mojo
01:17 Paolo
01:12 Paolo
01:11 Kalle (kafir forever)
01:01 Joe
00:53 someone
00:53 Kalle (kafir forever)
00:49 Reed
23:56 Christopher Johnson