Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Thu 04/01/2010 View Wed 03/31/2010 View Tue 03/30/2010 View Mon 03/29/2010 View Sun 03/28/2010 View Sat 03/27/2010 View Fri 03/26/2010
1
2010-04-01 Home Front: Politix
Profiles in Courage: Dem lawmaker cancels town hall due to security concerns
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Fred 2010-04-01 00:00|| || Front Page|| [1 views ]  Top

#1 Ryan's office told the news outlets that it plans to reschedule the event and hold it at a venue that has adequate security

ie a dark union hall populated by truncheon-wielding SEIU goons
Posted by lex 2010-04-01 00:33||   2010-04-01 00:33|| Front Page Top

#2 This is the Traficant seat, FWIW.
Posted by Halliburton - Mysterious Conspiracy Division 2010-04-01 01:05||   2010-04-01 01:05|| Front Page Top

#3 The peasants are revolting!
/Tim Ryan
Posted by ed 2010-04-01 01:21||   2010-04-01 01:21|| Front Page Top

#4 Reload!
Posted by Besoeker 2010-04-01 05:38||   2010-04-01 05:38|| Front Page Top

#5 This was not meant to be a place where we're going to talk partisan politics
In other words, he only wants to talk to people who slavishly agree with him.
Posted by Rambler in Virginia  2010-04-01 07:16||   2010-04-01 07:16|| Front Page Top

#6 I was at a Cao Town Hall, and to his credit he showed up, allowed anyone in, and accepted questions from anyone - though of course weaseled around answering a lot of them. But he's a Republican, kind of.
Posted by Glenmore 2010-04-01 08:04||   2010-04-01 08:04|| Front Page Top

#7 "Don't get me wrong, Congressman Ryan will debate anyone that agrees with him, anytime." There fixed it for them. "A threatening letter" Like one? What pussies. I dare them to walk a half mile in Glen Beck's, Ann Coulter's, or Sean Hanniy's shoes. I say half cause they would curl up in a ball weeping after that. What I take away from the article is that they (donks) do not want accountability for votes.
Posted by Cyber Sarge 2010-04-01 08:42||   2010-04-01 08:42|| Front Page Top

#8 Profiles in Courage...Snarky headline of the day award.
Posted by JohnQC 2010-04-01 10:32||   2010-04-01 10:32|| Front Page Top

#9 These individuals are refusing to come to there performance review. If someone was supposed to be working for me, but was actually being coached in how to rip me off, acting as though they OWN me instead, I would fire them IMMEDIATELY and go after them what they took from me. Recall now. Recall is a viable, All American, internal process. Don't wait until November to remove "some of them" or these coniving thieves will make it harder to do then.
Posted by wt 2010-04-01 10:39||   2010-04-01 10:39|| Front Page Top

#10 I didn't think there was a provision in the U.S. Constitution for recall. However, I thought I read that some States have a kind of provision for recall. If recall is viable, I am all for it when representatives are arrogant, ignore the will of the people--in other words don't do their job and don't think they are accountable to anyone but party (or collective if you prefer).
Posted by JohnQC 2010-04-01 11:56||   2010-04-01 11:56|| Front Page Top

#11 We're gonna vote your fat ass out" is a threat, I guess

"I disagree with you" is a threat also.

Al
Posted by Frozen Al 2010-04-01 12:26||   2010-04-01 12:26|| Front Page Top

23:43 newc
23:33 newc
23:31 Old Patriot
23:27 rwv
23:23 JohnQC
23:11 JohnQC
23:11 Frank G
22:51 JosephMendiola
22:48  abu do you love
22:46 JosephMendiola
22:41 JosephMendiola
22:34 Atomic Conspiracy
22:08 Chief
21:55 GK
21:52 Atomic Conspiracy
21:48 Old Patriot
21:41 Frank G
21:40 Alaska Paul
21:40 Frank G
21:39 Barbara Skolaut
21:16 DarthVader
21:12 OldSpook
21:12 xbalanke
21:09 xbalanke









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com