Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Mon 04/18/2016 View Sun 04/17/2016 View Sat 04/16/2016 View Fri 04/15/2016 View Thu 04/14/2016 View Wed 04/13/2016 View Tue 04/12/2016
1
2016-04-18 Home Front: Politix
U.S. High Court Takes up Explosive Immigration Fight
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by trailing wife 2016-04-18 00:00|| || Front Page|| [1 views ]  Top

#1 "No one individual state should be allowed to disrupt federal immigration policy."

Left unstated - "Only a few select individuals are so empowered."
Posted by Bobby 2016-04-18 07:36||   2016-04-18 07:36|| Front Page Top

#2 This has nothing to do with immigration and everything to do with a president refusing to perform one on his primary responsibilities: defend our borders.
Posted by CrazyFool 2016-04-18 08:13||   2016-04-18 08:13|| Front Page Top

#3 SCOTUS no longer recognizes the sovereign status of American citizenship, why expect any defense of sovereign borders?
Posted by Procopius2k 2016-04-18 08:34||   2016-04-18 08:34|| Front Page Top

#4 If SCOTUS doesn't recognize the legal standing of states when their schools, hospitals and social services are being overwhelmed by illegal aliens then we really do live in a dictatorship.
Posted by Abu Uluque 2016-04-18 10:36||   2016-04-18 10:36|| Front Page Top

#5 I suspect they Court will find the States do not have jurisdiction to address immigration. The question will be do they then have no standing to contest Federal immigration law enforcement - or lack thereof. In fact does anyone have standing to contest it? The best outcome the states are likely to get is a 4-4 split, returning the status to that of the various lower courts.
Posted by Glenmore 2016-04-18 12:27||   2016-04-18 12:27|| Front Page Top

#6 It's not even an immigration fight. It's all about selective enforcement of law. The law as applied to illegal aliens. People who entered the U.S. illegally, whether for good intent or evil.
Posted by Bobby 2016-04-18 12:57||   2016-04-18 12:57|| Front Page Top

#7 Well the oligarchy in DC benefits from illegals, so I expect the SC to at best be deadlocked in this and at worst confirming their power over the states and the people by telling them to shut up and color or lose federal funds and possible jail time.
Posted by DarthVader 2016-04-18 13:07||   2016-04-18 13:07|| Front Page Top

23:56 Procopius2k
23:49 rammer
23:39 badanov
22:17 Elmavish Panda1401
21:47 Lone Ranger
20:42 Ho Chi Crinens5363
20:23 Glenmore
20:13 charger
20:12 Zenobia Floger6220
20:09 badanov
19:57 Thing From Snowy Mountain
19:48 trailing wife
19:11 badanov
18:47 swksvolFF
18:24 Procopius2k
18:15 Ebbang Uluque6305
18:10 Skidmark
18:10 phil_b
18:04 Ebbang Uluque6305
17:48 Skidmark
17:45 Skidmark
17:02 49 pan
16:47 SteveS
16:44 g(r)omgoru









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com