Article

2016-06-01 Government

House Democrats ask to review Benghazi report before it is released

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Besoeker 2016-06-01 09:16|| || Front Page|| [11131 views ] Top

#1 They refused to be a constructive part of the process, now they want to change the outcomes. Bugger OFF !

Posted by Besoeker 2016-06-01 09:24|| 2016-06-01 09:24|| Front Page Top

#2 I thought Elijah Cummings was involved somewhere in this story--one of the biggest obstructionists in the Donk Party.

Posted by JohnQC 2016-06-01 11:03|| 2016-06-01 11:03|| Front Page Top

#3 According to Hillary and her minions there is nothing to see here so why the concern by the House Donks about anyone seeing the Benghazi report?

Posted by JohnQC 2016-06-01 11:05|| 2016-06-01 11:05|| Front Page Top

#4 "Such a report would not have the benefit of robust vetting by all select committee members and, as a result, very likely would include critical errors and other deficiencies."

Paving the way to an excuse.

Posted by gorb 2016-06-01 11:36|| 2016-06-01 11:36|| Front Page Top

#5 Seems like they know Queen McCacklepants will not look good from this report and they want to soften the blow so the media has a better spin.

Posted by DarthVader 2016-06-01 11:44|| 2016-06-01 11:44|| Front Page Top

#6 So they can prepare the spin and get in front of the press cycle. Screw them. They have fought and complained the whole way. Let them put their misgivings in their rebuttal report. Then file charge of obstruction against them.

Yet again, another example of just how broken our congress is. An ambassador is brutally murdered and the investigation is a partisan event. All of them in congress needs to bow before our Statue of Liberty and beg forgiveness.

Posted by 49 pan 2016-06-01 11:45|| 2016-06-01 11:45|| Front Page Top

#7 I don't know why the Donks even bother. Any spinning and obfuscating that needs to take place to protect Shedevil will be performed by the fawning media.

Posted by Crusader 2016-06-01 12:12|| 2016-06-01 12:12|| Front Page Top

#8 Heh, heh. Elections have consequences.

Posted by Ebbang Uluque6305 2016-06-01 12:16|| 2016-06-01 12:16|| Front Page Top

#9 Do you mean this Elijah Cummings?

Posted by Vast Right Wing Conspiracy 2016-06-01 13:21|| 2016-06-01 13:21|| Front Page Top

#10 At this point any mutterings about "It should be bi-partisan" is just trolling by the 5 democrats on the House Select Committee.

Posted by Charles 2016-06-01 16:08|| 2016-06-01 16:08|| Front Page Top

#11 Tell them to go fuck themselves. Cite the Tydings Committee Report.

Posted by Iblis 2016-06-01 16:35|| 2016-06-01 16:35|| Front Page Top

#12 The proper response is: We have to release the report to know what is in it.

Posted by Mortimer Braille, Esq. 2016-06-01 19:40|| 2016-06-01 19:40|| Front Page Top

21:39 charger
21:29 lord garth
20:18 Iblis
20:15 swksvolFF
19:46 NoMoreBS
19:40 Mortimer Braille, Esq.
19:28 Deacon Blues
19:25 Deacon Blues
19:17 BrerRabbit
18:16 Chantry
17:52 DarthVader
16:57 Mullah Richard
16:54 JohnQC
16:40 DarthVader
16:35 Iblis
16:21 Steve White
16:19 Charles
16:12 Charles
16:10 Charles
16:08 Charles
16:06 Charles
16:00 Besoeker
15:12 trailing wife
14:55 Pearl Gleang3937