Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Wed 09/11/2019 View Tue 09/10/2019 View Mon 09/09/2019 View Sun 09/08/2019 View Sat 09/07/2019 View Fri 09/06/2019 View Thu 09/05/2019
1
2019-09-11 Home Front: Politix
Mitt Romney ‘Very Unhappy’ with John Bolton’s Firing, Suggests ‘John Bolton’ as Replacement
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Fred 2019-09-11 00:00|| || Front Page|| [9 views ]  Top

#1 No. This can't be from any source other than the Bee. I don't believe the goof said this.
Posted by Lex 2019-09-11 00:28||   2019-09-11 00:28|| Front Page Top

#2 Dang! I totally had Bee.

Actually, this kinda sorta makes sense. Bolton has strong, well-defined views, and a weapons-grade mustache. He is a perfect candidate for National Security Advisor. Except for the just getting fired thing.
Posted by SteveS 2019-09-11 00:47||   2019-09-11 00:47|| Front Page Top

#3 
Posted by Herb McCoy  2019-09-11 01:01||   2019-09-11 01:01|| Front Page Top

#4 As Instapundit pointed out "Now Bolton will become popular".
Posted by g(r)omgoru 2019-09-11 01:14||   2019-09-11 01:14|| Front Page Top

#5 There are articles already urging him to 'Speak up ! Speak about your experience of serving the Trump.'
Posted by Dron66046 2019-09-11 01:27||   2019-09-11 01:27|| Front Page Top

#6 Bolton speaks up "He wouldn't let me use Death Star on Norks. So I resigned!"
Posted by g(r)omgoru 2019-09-11 01:39||   2019-09-11 01:39|| Front Page Top

#7 Going soft on the Taliban was a decision made by a moderate Republican administration on 2001.

This has been de facto Western consensus policy since then.

I'm not aware of any public criticism of this consensus articulated by Romney at any time.
Posted by Elmerert Hupens2660 2019-09-11 01:44||   2019-09-11 01:44|| Front Page Top

#8 My deleted comment was

Aww, neocon warmonger can't start a war? Boo hoo so sad for them. Now people aren't going to die.

Can anyone tell me what part of Rantburg's rules that violated? And justified deletion?
Posted by Herb McCoy  2019-09-11 07:33||   2019-09-11 07:33|| Front Page Top

#9 Perhaps your welcome was worn out?
Posted by Rob Crawford 2019-09-11 08:05||   2019-09-11 08:05|| Front Page Top

#10 I don't see a problem with your comment, Herb. Matter of fact it's hard to argue with it, so I'll pass.
Posted by Raj 2019-09-11 08:08||   2019-09-11 08:08|| Front Page Top

#11 And Mitt? Go take your dog Seamus for another ride, sensitive guy.
Posted by Raj 2019-09-11 08:09||   2019-09-11 08:09|| Front Page Top

#12 Willard the Carpetbagger needs to come out of the closet and be honest with himself and the world: He's a Democrat.
Posted by Abu Uluque 2019-09-11 10:12||   2019-09-11 10:12|| Front Page Top

#13 It wasn't the Babylon Bee !?! Consider me shocked, shocked I say!
Posted by magpie 2019-09-11 14:50||   2019-09-11 14:50|| Front Page Top

#14 Aww, neocon warmonger can't start a war? Boo hoo so sad for them. Now people aren't going to die.

People are still going to die. Seems to be the way of the world. And we can still have wars. They just need to have a beginning, a middle and and end. None of this decades of nation-building in silliness.
Posted by SteveS 2019-09-11 18:48||   2019-09-11 18:48|| Front Page Top

23:48 Slolumble Flomoling4297
23:43 Vernal Hatrick
23:39 JohnQC
23:38 Slolumble Flomoling4297
23:28 JohnQC
23:20 JohnQC
23:13 Slolumble Flomoling4297
22:18 Lex
22:13 Lex
22:12 Lex
22:02 Lex
21:58 Lex
21:44 chris
21:34 Vinegar Protector of the Slytherins7734
21:33 jpal
21:28 Vinegar Protector of the Slytherins7734
21:25 Vinegar Protector of the Slytherins7734
21:07 Slolumble Flomoling4297
20:29 Slolumble Flomoling4297
20:11 Whiskey Mike
20:03 Slolumble Flomoling4297
19:58 ruprecht
19:57 trailing wife
19:51 Skidmark









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com