Article

2003-10-13 Home Front

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Sorge 2003-10-13 6:42:01 AM|| || Front Page|| [11128 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 When I deployed, I didn't even know that this Radley Balko cared for me. I feel so much better knowing that the left-wing has my back. Why were they always spitting at me, though, and throwing eggs and tomatos. Was theat an expression of their love?

Posted by Super Hose 2003-10-13 7:54:31 AM|| 2003-10-13 7:54:31 AM|| Front Page Top

#2 They're a little confused on the right way to prepare a southwest omelet.

Posted by Robert Crawford 2003-10-13 8:53:31 AM|| [http://www.kloognome.com] 2003-10-13 8:53:31 AM|| Front Page Top

#3 it's 'asks for a check from you and me' not 'you and I'

Posted by Anonymous 2003-10-13 10:16:49 AM|| 2003-10-13 10:16:49 AM|| Front Page Top

#4 Gee, the last time I checked, we weren't living in "Starship Troopers" where the only people allowed to vote or run society were those who completed service in the military. On the other hand, since I've done my time, let's do it. :)

Posted by whitecollar redneck 2003-10-13 10:47:00 AM|| 2003-10-13 10:47:00 AM|| Front Page Top

#5 Well, I've found that I disagree with 90% of what appears on "LewRockwell.com", to the point I don't even read it any more. Rockwell's ideas are too arrogant for my taste - I hate anyone that constantly tells me how right he is. If this guy had half a brain, he'd be as popular as Ben Shapiro, and would have a reason to be listened to. Instead he is merely a bad (leftist) reflection of Rockwell, and equally as worthless.

I don't vote libertarian because the Libertarian party has too many wackos that have convinced themselves of their own greatness - delusional, in most cases.

Posted by Old Patriot 2003-10-13 12:07:41 PM|| [http://users.codenet.net/mweather/default.htm] 2003-10-13 12:07:41 PM|| Front Page Top

#6 "If it's the former, the ideologues who were against war and government (as in organized action) are going to look pretty stupid. If it's the latter, they're still going to look pretty stupid â and evil."

Naaahhh - they'll rewrite history, as usual

Posted by Frank G 2003-10-13 12:25:45 PM|| 2003-10-13 12:25:45 PM|| Front Page Top

#7 What a bummer. Radley had a pretty good wrapup on the 36 year career of Luddite Senator Fritz Hollings (to which I say, 'Good riddance').

Posted by Raj 2003-10-13 12:33:16 PM|| [http://angrycyclist.blogspot.com] 2003-10-13 12:33:16 PM|| Front Page Top

#8 Raj - Radley did a good rip on Fritz and the proper (Fred's rules) way to acknowledge/refer is just how you did it, thx :-)

Posted by Frank G 2003-10-13 12:51:23 PM|| 2003-10-13 12:51:23 PM|| Front Page Top

#9 Ouch! It always feels bad to be rebuked. But, besides the fact this site is your property and you do what you will, you are right that this site is about links to the war on terrorism. My future guest posts will be all related to the war. About the piece being an Ad Hominem attack; it certainly is, but I believe myself justified since the original piece by Balko is itself an Ad Hominem attack.

Posted by Sorge 2003-10-13 3:30:35 PM|| [http://www.forgottenfronts.com/] 2003-10-13 3:30:35 PM|| Front Page Top

#10 I prefer to think of it as a reminder, not a rebuke.

Posted by Fred 2003-10-13 3:44:35 PM|| 2003-10-13 3:44:35 PM|| Front Page Top

#11 Hey! Is this the best mannered Blog around or what?

Posted by Shipman 2003-10-13 6:12:06 PM|| 2003-10-13 6:12:06 PM|| Front Page Top

#12 I said, boy, I said boy where them chickens. I said boy, you're about as sharp as a bo.w.l.i.ng ball.

Posted by Foghorn L 2003-10-13 8:08:26 PM|| 2003-10-13 8:08:26 PM|| Front Page Top

#13 Is it a fallacious argument to demand/question that you put your life or those of your kids on the line if you advocate a military solution? None of the Neocons have their kids in the military

Posted by Not Mike Moore 2003-10-13 11:59:25 PM|| 2003-10-13 11:59:25 PM|| Front Page Top

#14 It is so stupid. If you can't agrue FOR war unless you serve in the military....then you can't argue for meals on wheels, unless you cook in the kitchen...and you can't argue for abortion...unless you work the vacuums...and you can't be for or against any politician...unless you are on his staff.

The funniest part about the whole chickenhawk theory is that it is always put forth by the chickens....never the hawks.

Posted by B 2003-10-14 3:21:38 AM|| 2003-10-14 3:21:38 AM|| Front Page Top

#15 Oh...and don't ever call for the fire department unless you plan to join the fire brigade. right? Shheessh.

Posted by B 2003-10-14 3:40:47 AM|| 2003-10-14 3:40:47 AM|| Front Page Top

#16 No, you lose the moral authority to argue for war if you yourself SHIRKED THE OBLIGATION TO SERVE. How difficult is that for you to people to comprehend? My god it only takes two or three synapses to figure that out.

But of course you guys are infested with moralists like Bill Bennett, and Rush Limbaugh, who inveigh against moral derelictions that they themselves have no intention of observing, and it bothers you not one whit, so I guess rank hypyocrisy is something you guys are entirely confortable with. Probably helps explain how you can support a lying, incomptent, unelected, fraud who leaks the identities of deep-cover CIA operatives and believe you are restoring "honor and dignity to the White House."

None are so blind as those that will not see.

Posted by Anonymous 2003-10-16 6:46:41 PM|| 2003-10-16 6:46:41 PM|| Front Page Top

18:46 Anonymous
09:25 Raptor
05:38 Bulldog
03:40 B
03:21 B
03:08 B
23:59 Not Mike Moore
23:47 Not Mike Moore
23:33 .com
23:25 .com
23:22 Not Mike Moore
23:07 Not Mike Moore
23:04 Not Mike Moore
23:03 Jennie Taliaferro
23:03 Bomb-a-rama
23:01 RussSchultz
22:58 Jennie Taliaferro
22:58 Not Mike Moore
22:54 Not Mike Moore
22:40 Igs
22:37 Anonymous
22:13 .com
22:07 Frank G
21:43 Ptah